News Focus
News Focus
Followers 637
Posts 38176
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/29/2003

Re: DreamGreen post# 29623

Tuesday, 06/06/2017 1:30:54 AM

Tuesday, June 06, 2017 1:30:54 AM

Post# of 96940
Now...I need to Ask You what I asked GS1.

Just substitute RPX for Cisco[which is decided].

How long does RPX have to appeal this decision from the PTAB?

63 days from 5/25/2017

Are they allowed to do that?
__________________________________________________
Quote:
III. CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, we determine that RPX has not shown by a
preponderance of the evidence that claims 1–31 are unpatentable.

IV. ORDER
It is
ORDERED claims 1–31 of the ’822 patent are not held unpatentable;
and
FURTHER ORDERED that, because this is a Final Written Decision,
parties to the proceeding seeking judicial review of the decision must
comply with the notice and service requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 90.2.
__________________________________________________

TIA Mama

$$$$ UOIP $$$$

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today