News Focus
News Focus
Followers 35
Posts 2798
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/28/2013

Re: terry hallinan post# 10964

Thursday, 05/22/2014 9:39:03 AM

Thursday, May 22, 2014 9:39:03 AM

Post# of 819922
Terry:

You weren't talking to me, but your post about the importance of the systemic response to kill the mets reminded me of something I had wanted to say about the Direct data.

I am hoping that the direct data ultimately shows that the smaller the un-injected tumor is, the greater the damage. Being close to the injected tumor is good, but for mets the same distance away from the injected tumor, does smaller mean more vulnerable? If so; If the data shows that to be true; then it would seem reasonable to project that very tiny mets would be vulnerable at great distances. And most mets are probably very tiny in the beginning.

A comment on the use of the word mets for metastases. All the abbreviations and acronyms in this space are a problem for me. But I love the term "mets". I vote for officially replacing the word metastases with the word "mets". Someone should introduce that bill in congress.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News