The more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation is.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Company will grow with 2 new approved drugs, I'm waiting for a pull back
to $4.50 to start buying. Every time the stock hits a high not necessarily the high
eventually it trades down at least $1.50. Could $5.45 be the exception? Maybe but chasing
a high has more than often turned out to be a lack of patience.
SGEN hit new high 221+
Pfizer bought SGEN for $229 in cash. A get paid to wait situation.
I’ve never seen a RS hold it’s value, even though mathematically it can be justified.
What a life! A great person.
Memory and more memory
The gaming industry is Innovative. They will/are finding was to express the meta verse with digital art etc.
They also need discovery, remember that was where case was headed when claim 16 came up and judge agreed to stay everything else.
All that money and they still plunder other peoples gold and do the emotional equivalent of dragging them behind a horse for years rather than pay.
According to the calendar -- At the current time most proceedings will be held remotely. If your proceeding is scheduled as a webinar, you should follow the Webinar Instructions below. If your proceeding is a Case Management Conference or other type of telephonic hearing, you should follow the Telephonic Hearing Instructions below.
Zero reasons to even have a webinar imo.
Cramer describes the sea of companies around Microns upbeat interview. Where is Netlist in it all?
This will increase the pressure to come clean for that absent license.
Micron CEO just said on CNBC that todays servers are 50% memory
Are you saying the contract with Wave will allow Samsung to re-litigate the BOC with Netlist?
That filing is a huge Merry Christmas!
Yeah so much gets left out in this interview, frustrating.
Yeah the greed sounds something like if you give in they’ll think your weak.
Yeah it is hard for me to understand the resistance to paying for something that has helped create the wealth of a company, especially since the payment is so affordable for the company.
This thread continues to be interesting. Lots of history and good q & a.
https://www.reddit.com/r/NLST/comments/rhrqon/more_history_reminders_from_jason_sheasby/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
As a whole I don’t take estimates literally. I do that them directionally.
Me too. He has a great mind and has put it to good use for all to benefit.
Ain’t it grand? :)
Pps woke up a bit today. Those bid sitters are so patient.
HA! Lol
YES, it’s comical G on the backside of 12 yr infringement lawsuit arms crossed tapping their foot stating they want to wait for Samsung to finish. You know they will at least ask the judge for that.
Idk, I think there needs to be a more verifiable way of coming up with some those percentages. Maybe the thread did today. But even if turned out to be as little as 25% of his calcs that’s $16 pps just for G in royalties.
I just don’t see how S can maintain their drag it out policy and close a deal for a license. How can those two things exist in parallel and produce fruit…..
New perspective on G servers 2009 - 2020/ calc for settlement:
https://www.reddit.com/r/NLST/comments/rgt8zb/google_back_royalty_amount_estimate/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
!!!!!!!!! super news !!!!!!!!!!
No, they gained value buy winning another case.
Here is confirmation:
https://stocktwits.com/Alanicu/message/413577178
Netlist was also not allowed to use any of the nuances about working with a criminal company. The jury did not know that one purpose of the contract (implied) was for Netlist to receive value in exchange for Samsung using their patents. Also the clause in the JDLA stipulating disputes must use NY State contract law protected
Samsung.
Netlist won the case of BOC.
So the consequences from the judges ruling that Samsung breached are still intact. $23 MM, no license and maybe the Tax issue. Also Samsung admitted to infringing.
What I see here is even money/influence/delays cannot stop a trial. Will S settle? We won’t have to wait long now to find out. Can they argue whatever the jury decides? Sure, but that too has a times up moment. S behavior has been so ridiculous and obvious their arguments have less and less staying power.
Wednesday
Buy the dips!
Where did W get the info?:
Wesley 6 hours ago Replied to a reaction
@Dave I read that market research firm Omdia tracked this recently, 50% of mobile devices to have this architecture in 2023.
HUGE if you did not see it on YMB:
Wesley6 hours ago
Already 10% of smartphones or tablets now use Netlist's patented LPDDR5+ Flash Dynamic Voltage & Frequency Scaling memory architecture. The highest voltage 3.3V that wasn't in LPDDR4 is for rapid downloading at 5G speeds 400Megabit/second with the LPDDR5 chip for smartphones & tablets. Also the Flash memory in this needs high voltage 2.5V for transfer from DRAM to Flash. The DVFS of LPDDR5 results in less reads & writes & speed is 50% faster than LPDDR4X the previous mobile memory generation & consumes 20% less power. This patent will rule 15 years.