Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So what your saying is your have to re-take 3rd grade again because you still can't read or write? Sounds like a good idea!
bullrunner, If you got in that low(0.0047) I wish you had cashed out some and spent it on some english/punctuation lessons. Your run-on gibberish is about one post away from ignore for me!
Have a great Memorial day all!
USN 1975-1979
CV-41 (Midway)
I have been holding on for 7 years waiting for just one of these
"exciting developments" to actually happen!
Guess we will find out in a week.
I won't be holding my breath in anticipation.
chef911,
regarding ISO 9001 you said:
shadolane
jjsmith77,
Thanks for the reasoned response. Here is where I think some of the details are overlooked:
1: The INSPECT closed loop link you used is talking about monitoring/guiding an automated welding machine based on the weld pool data it captures. It is sending that data over to the expert system(software). When the process starts to get out of control it decides which parameters to adjust. Which in turn sends a corrective action over to the machine.
My point is that expert systems are not perfect. They learn as you use them. I run CNC EDM (hence the EDMGUY) machines every day with expert systems.They are a huge benefit to making consistently good parts.They react to a potentially destructive situation far faster(micro seconds) than I can. Once I prove out my process on that part I can run my machine all night/weekend unattended with a high confidence of good parts.
2:A welding process although similar is far less sophisticated than a powder bed AM process. Making it much more difficult to develop an expert system for AM.
Does that mean INSPECT is not a closed loop process? No
But it doesn't mean that you can just install it on any machine and start making any part you need that day and they will all be good parts.
The true benefit to me is once you have a good process for making a good part you can use the captured build data to prove that nothing bad happened for every part. Your inspection needs are greatly reduced.
And it can stop the build if an event is detected that would likely result in a bad part(less scrap and wasted machine time).
I know this is getting long but one last thing.
I don't think the speed issue is strictly the cm3/hr. It's more the difference between making a nozzle in 1 piece with AM or a 10 pc assembly with conventional machining(slower and more expensive).
I have done a fair amount of machining with Nickel and Inconel and they are extremely difficult metals to handle.
Great discussion
Regards
jjsmith77,
Please don't see this as a desire to start a huge pissing contest.
I am a stockholder/long and am very pro SGLB.
You posted:
Up 900% today.How bad could it be! LOL
Yeah I know it's pathetic I have been holding that long.
But words fail to describe how excited I am with D'Couto performance to date!
NPS2008
Well as they say "misery loves company"
I have been a holder (share or bag,your call)
for 7+ years waiting for Neah to show or sell any working product.
All hat no cattle doesn't even come close to reality for me.
Epic fail helps a little!
Regards
Driftin,
The short answer is they are both first!
The main difference is one is a ROCKET engine the other is a JET engine.
I was a jet engine mechanic in the U.S.N. ,and am now a precision machinist (30 yrs in the trade).My opinion is the jet engine is far more complicated and difficult to produce using AM than a rocket.Even though both would need precision machining after AM, the jet with it's high rpm rotation and bearing surfaces would be quite an accomplishment.Both really neat tho.
Regards
Maybe it's because there is no way to refute them CREDIBLY!
LOOKOUT BEEEELLLOOOOOWWWWWWW!!!!
SPLATTTT!!!!!
OH LOOK REVO EVERYWHERE
LOL
HOW'S THAT MATURE INVESTOR THING LOOKING?
Just to be fair, it doesn't say he did/or is doing both at the same time.
Lots of people leave big companies and go over to the competition seeing a bigger opportunity there.
No offense intended but you are still off by miles. This is from the most recent Forbes list:
Russia the Billionaire capital of the world is total nonsense!
Two of the top 50 billionaires are Russian. Less than 10 out of the top 100. The USA is by far the highest.
They probably sold both of them just a week before you got there!!
Now they are out of inventory again. Probably need another mold to keep up with the demand.LOL
Dude,
FLTT is a trip zero/pinky/non reporting/reverse split/money losing scam.
They wouldn't even come close to meeting the uplist requirements.
Get real.
What a hoot this place is!
Jeff,
Is this that slide down to S3 on your chart you were calling?
I'm getting out NOW!
Thanks for the heads up.
Short answer: NO
Long answer: ABSOLUTELY NOT
At least they have managed to accumulate a cash hoard of more than 2 grand(I have half that in my wallet) so they probably won't need to utilize the A/S increase of 7Billion(in 3weeks time) anytime soon! LOL
Your question was asking if anyone knew when an unknown future event (news) would happen. My point was nobody could possibly know unless they can see into the future, so why ask?
How do you think anyone here could possibly know when news is coming?
Jeff,
The latest quarterly report is below. As far as I know and I'm guessing you already knew, that is the most current publicly available info on AMMX. With them not being a fully reporting company this is as good as it gets right? it took me all of 30 seconds to find it and cut/paste it here. What other factual help could you possibly expect from anyone? after pasting 20 charts a day here showing how little potential there is why would you now want to buy in?
I have worked in the precision tool & die/moldmaking trade for over 30 years and don't see any overlap between Sigma and Renishaw products. Renishaw is strictly a physical probing/scanning system to make accurate measurements of a part. The closest I could see them being used in the AM market is to take physical measurements during or after the process to see how close to finish dimensions the part is. That would at least allow the user to minimize the amount of material needing post AM machining. Since AM is only a near net shape process it would be of value but still has nothing to do with controlling the melt pool and build-up process like Sigma is working on. That's my 2 cent's worth.
I'm open to rebuttal if anyone has one, otherwise Renishaw is of no concern to me at all.
Regards
This must be the drifting sideways cycle Jeff Decker called a week or so ago! Good call Jeff
Looks like dead money today. Probably should just bailout now move on! LOL
Does he have shares?
What a hoot. Anybody that has been around VHGI as long as you knows full well he has shares!
Just in case you FORGOT here's a clip from the 10K
The ignore button is at the bottom of every page
If God was telling you to buy He would have made sure you had the money. Maybe you should check your connection with him!
r0und3r,
Thanks for the clarification. Just so you know, I wasn't trying to be negative on you or SGLB. I follow a bunch of boards and it is truly amazing how many people post how they think their favorite penny or even sub-penny with no rev or profit is going to do an r/s so they can jump up to a better market. I wasn't implying that about you. Sorry if it came off that way. I really do like the calm/reasonable dialogue on this board. It's a rare find on IHUB.
Regards
It's not as simple as doing a quick r/s and then uplisting. There are much bigger hurdles to getting on NASD than share price. here is a quick example:
Listing Standard No. 1
The company must have aggregate pre-tax earnings in the prior three years of at least $11 million, in the prior two years at least $2.2 million, and no one year in the prior three years can have a net loss.
Listing Standard No. 2
The company must have a minimum aggregate cash flow of at least $27.5 million for the past three fiscal years, with no negative cash flow in any of those three years. In addition, its average market capitalization over the prior 12 months must be at least $550 million, and revenues in the previous fiscal year must be $110 million, minimum.
Listing Standard No. 3
Companies can be removed from the cash flow requirement of Standard No. 2 if the average market capitalization over the past 12 months is at least $850 million, and revenues over the prior fiscal year are at least $90 million.
A company has three ways to get listed on the Nasdaq, depending on the underlying fundamentals of the company. If a company does not meet certain criteria, such as the operating income minimum, it has to make it up with larger minimum amounts in another area like revenue. This helps to improve the quality of companies listed on the exchange.
LOL for me too. I guess that explains why WIKI is free and can be edited by anyone !
DR V,
Yes there is a board. Search for Regen BioPharma and you will see it's already set up. Just waiting on the ticker to start posting on it.
rounder,
I agree with you that uplisting would be a great boost for current holders( me included). It only seems fair to say it's not as simple as doing an r/s to meet the share price req.
Under the new NasdaqCM requirements, a stock can qualify for listing if it closes at $3 or above for at least five consecutive business days prior to approval. The five-day requirement is in place to reduce the risk of price manipulation aimed at allowing a security to qualify for listing. In addition to the $3 share price requirement, the company must meet the following requirements:
Stockholders’ equity of at least $5 million
Market value of publicly held shares of at least $15 million
Two years of operating history
Or:
Net income from continuing operations of $750,000 in the most recently completed fiscal year or in two of the three most recently completed fiscal years
Stockholders’ equity of at least $4 million
Market value of publicly held shares of at least $5 million.
Securities with a $2 minimum closing price for five consecutive business days prior to the approval can also qualify for listing on the NasdaqCM if they meet the Market Value of Listed Securities Standard, which requires a market value of listed securities of at least $50 million, stockholders’ equity of at least $4 million, and a market value of publicly held shares of at least $15 million
In addition, companies must demonstrate that they have more than $2 million in net tangible assets if they have been in continuous operation for at least three years, or more than $5 million if they’ve been in continuous operation for less than three years. A company must also have average revenue of at least $6 million for the past three years. All other requirements for listing on the Capital Market are the same or higher than those of the NYSE Amex
diddy,
you seem to have the same confusion as a lot of others here about the divy shares. As it says in the filing, the 1 for 147 is just a guess. The Actual divy ratio cannot be determined until the actual number of shareholders on record is known. As soon as that is known then it,s simple math to get true ratio for distributing 20M regen shares. The number of regen shares being distributed is already fixed at 20M. The only unknown is the exact ratio. It is approx 147 to 1, but could change up or down depending on the final tally of BMSN shares being held. Make sense?
koen2,
Knowing how quick these things can spiral out of control how about I just nip it in the bud. What I intended as a light hearted comment of your use of a dot instead of a comma in your 750 number obviously struck a nerve. So I'll just step up and offer my sincere apology for the offense. I probably shouldn't have said it at all. It won't happen again.
Again sorry for the offense
GLTY
Your post said $750.000 not $750,000.00
Thanks for the advice. I think I will keep trading anyway.