Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Ahhhh, thanks for the signoff. I was puzzled who you might be.
RagingBull died a sudden death, but all your 1,400+ posts from the IAUS thread during 2003-2010 are still alive and well in my archive.
Those were the good ol' days, eh?
Some of the die-hards bought lenses, claimed the credit, were denied by the IRS, then petitioned the US Tax Court. Their court records are public info now. Great fun.
Still waiting for the victory party at the Wynn in Las Vegas?
From your pal MaddDawg (RIP) in his Post# 172867 on February 27, 2009:
I have a feeling there will be contracts announced next week and then we are off to the races.
Dr Doug is planning a party at the Wynn perhaps in April. There should be a lot of IAS millionaires by then.
Sure is a pretty day.
TED
re: Is he (Shepard) still the shadiest MF'er east of the mississippi?
Nope. He's from west of the Mississippi. Utah.
Imagine that.
He was one of the ones the DOJ went after. He and Neldon, as well as Roger Freeborn (RIP).
The judge froze all their assets. Lots of stuff still going on in the legal arena.
The fiasco is discussed at:
https://www.siliconinvestor.com/subject.aspx?subjectid=3984
But, the chatter is a lot more subdued ever since the judge handed down his ruling and demanded $50 Million to be disgorged.
The Pumper Patrol has been quite silent lately.
Imagine that.
Sure is a pretty day.
TED
If you haven't been following IAUS, then you might not know the IRS came down hard on them back in Nov of 2015.
Check out: http://www.iausenergy.com
Pay particular attention to the "News History" and "Court Docs".
Also, MaddDawg and his wife were murdered in their home back in early 2012. The case is still unsolved.
Sure is a pretty day.
TED
re: Does TEDennis post here?
No, I don't. Why do you ask?
TED
re: is Greg Sheppard (sp?) still affiliated with this company?
Greg Shepard is the Chief Director of Operations for RaPower3. They sell (sold) solar lenses via MLM structure.
TED
CPA questions.
See post #2153 on the Silicon Investor IAUS thread.
TED
It's now 2013. I wonder how RaPower3 is doing with sales of "Alternative Energy Systems" ... now that they have terminated the option to pay only 10% down and pay the rest the following year from their tax refund (if any).
They also quit offering bonuses.
So, why would anybody buy any AESes until the last day of December, 2013? If they buy today, their 30% deposit of the cost of the AES would essentially be dead money until next year's tax refund.
It seems like an unwise use of their funds.
Here's an idea ... they could use those same funds to buy IAUS stock today, then sell it for a huge profit later this year when all the good news about IAS/RaPower3 projects will have boosted the stock price into that 3-digit range the "cult members" have been telling us about for the past decade or so.
Just in case it wasn't obvious, that paragraph was laced with sarcasm.
OK, so if prospects delay their buying until the end of the year, that means the RaPower3 sales folks won't be selling anything, thus they won't be collecting commissions and might die of starvation between now and the end of the year ... but so what? At least we will have clean renewable energy. Right?
Just in case it wasn't obvious, that paragraph was laced with sarcasm.
Oh, and BTW ... IAS/RaPower3 doesn't sell "Alternative Energy Systems" anymore. They sell "Solar lenses".
I suspect that "minor" distinction has something to do with qualifying for the 30% Federal Renewable Energy tax credit.
Or, should I say ... TRYING to qualify.
I still don't think they qualify, and I haven't seen ANY attempts to prove that they do. All we've seen is a bunch of vague generalities, and some outright untruths (like, all you have to do is generate heat).
This is a new tax filing season, so there should be a bunch more taxpayers claiming the tax credit. If RaPower3's "success" ever catches somebody's eye at the IRS ... look out !!
Sure is a pretty day.
TED
Hmmmm ... I did some more thinking about the larger diameter that I think will be required for each circular pod in the new "braced" design ...
As I documented in my prior post, the towers would have to be "planted" farther apart, but what I didn't realize is ...
The towers will also have to be increased in height so the dual-axis system can still rotate and tilt from sunrise to sunset. Otherwise, the edges of the larger circumference pod will drag on the ground.
LOL !!!
OK, let's summarize ...
1) The existing 19 (not 20) towers are "planted" too close together.
2) The existing 19 (not 20) towers are too short.
I think I understand now why they haven't installed any of the new "braced" lenses into the existing 19 (not 20) towers.
Before they can even BEGIN to test those things, they have to "plant" more towers, because the new lenses won't work in the existing pod and tower structures.
The new towers will have to be taller and spaced farther apart. And, they they need to have a sturdier 4-pod support structure for the heavier pods, which could mean sturdier hydraulics for the tracking system.
I suspect the focal point of the lenses will have changed because of the added width of the pod, which means the suspension platform for the heat exchanger and concentrator will have to be changed, either higher or lower.
Good grief. What a circus.
Not to worry, though. "R&D has been completed". It says so, right there on RaPower3.com.
They wouldn't lie, would they?
Hmmm ... they already mass produced a lot of the various components, right?
Uh ....
TED
I've been wondering about the new "braced" lens design that was *supposed* to be the fix for the wind damage problem ...
... the wind damage problem that was *supposed* to be fixed by the "louvered lenses" ...
... which were the fix for the wind damage problem we were assured did not exist in the "pizza slice" lens design ...
... which was a modification of the "original" lens design that was shown in a picture with Dr. Justin Low several years ago.
During the 2011 National Convention (18 months ago), the new "braced lenses" were shown to attendees. They look very much like that "original* lens design.
So, what's different? Why would a design that is so similar to the *original* abandoned design now be able to solve the wind damage problem we have been told has already been fixed multiple times ... even though we were assured it didn't exist to begin with?
I think the answer is ... it won't. Meaning, there will still be a wind damage problem. Why? Because there will be almost TWICE as much surface area in the new "braced" lenses than was in the "pizza slice" lenses. So, there will be a larger surface area for the wind to wreak havoc with.
Not only that, but I suspect the entire circular framework for each pod and their supporting structure (truss?) will have to be redesigned.
Why? Check out the following pictures:
PIC-1: http://www.IAUSenergy.com/images/LensDesigns/17-lens-original.jpg
PIC-2: http://www.IAUSenergy.com/images/LensDesigns/17-lens-braced.jpg
PIC-1 is a life-sized photograph from way back in 2006 or 2007.
PIC-2 is an image I crafted by extracting the image of a lens from the life-sized photograph on RaPower3.com.
Note the area in the middle of PIC-1's circle (pod). All the lenses are shaped like pizza slices and are attached to the center pole. That provides stability (kind'a).
The lenses in PIC-2 are squared off on the "inside" closest to the center. Which means the point of the triangle is missing. There is nothing there to attach to a center pole, so there will have to be a new support structure for the squared off inside edge to attach to.
Not only that, but the newer "braced" lenses are almost TWICE the width of the "pizza slice" lenses, yet they have to fit together in essentially the same way.
Oddly enough, it requires SEVENTEEN lenses for BOTH designs.
Each pod for the original design was pretty darned heavy to begin with, which caused structural problems when all 4 pods were supported in their "truss". The dual-axis tracking system was already having problems driving the 4-pod structure, especially when it had to tilt side-to-side to follow the sun.
Each pod for the new braced design will be even heavier, which will increase the stress on the "truss" and the tracking system.
In addition to that, the diameter of the braced design will almost double, which means the trusses will have to increase their extension outward from the center of the tower ... thus increasing the stress on the trusses even more.
Maybe the above analysis could explain why we STILL haven't seen ANY of the new "braced" lenses installed at the pilot plant.
They first need to redesign the entire pod structure ...
... then they have to re-engineer the trusses to support the additional weight ...
... and then they have to move the towers farther apart to accommodate the additional diameter of each pod -- times 2.
Seems like the overall efficiency of this system isn't going to be quite as wonderful as was originally hyped.
Bummer.
Hey, all you "cult members" out there. How's things? You're welcome to provide a rebuttal for my above comments.
Or, you can just accept reality and admit you've been had.
Sure is a pretty day.
TED
The redesign of the lenses to add the "brace" always seemed curious to me.
First of all, pictures show that the new lens is almost the same size and shape as the first lens they tried. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if they were manufactured from the same mold.
OK, so that made me wonder if they will run into the same problem with the new "braced" design as they did with the first design.
We don't know what the problem was, because nobody ever told us. However, since the "brace" was added to offset the wind-caused "harmonic" vibration, I suspect somebody realized during initial testing (if any) that there was some serious exposure to wind damage. So, they discarded the first design and came up with the "pizza slice" design.
That didn't fix the problem. Ooops. So they designed the fancy "louvered" lens and used that design for all the early towers.
The wind STILL did some serious damage to the lens. Ooops.
Not only that, but whoever designed that version forgot to design in a way for the lens to revert to its "home" position after the wind died down. Pretty stupid, right?
OK, so along comes the design for the "braces". Will that design fix the wind-damage problem?
I don't know, but I doubt it. It might reduce the problem, but it won't fix it. Those are some pretty big chunks of plastic up there. Put all chunks into a circle, and you create an "umbrella". Try holding an umbrella in a heavy wind. Think about how heavy the lens framework is, then imagine the entire 4-pod structure getting "whip-sawed" by heavy winds. It seems like there would be LOTS of opportunities for severe damage to be done.
The "braced" lenses were "announced" way back during the 2011 National Convention -- EIGHTEEN MONTHS AGO. Yet, we STILL haven't seen ANY of them in use. WHY ???
Here's a picture of the "braced lens" that was taken during the 2011 Convention:
http://iausenergy.com/RaPower3/Images/NatCon/PIC002.jpg
Here's a question that occurred to me when I was thinking about this whole mess while I was watching the NFL playoff games yesterday.
If the "braces" were going to fix the wind problems in the old/new large lenses ... why not just add the "braces" to the smaller existing "pizza slice" lenses? That would have let them test the design to see if it worked in the existing lenses installed at the pilot plant.
Doh !!
Note that there have been *multiple* fixes for the wind problem ... the wind problem we were assured didn't exist.
Perhaps the "braced lenses" are merely another misdirection ploy to direct attention away from the disturbing fact that they STILL don't have even ONE tower operating.
They were supposed to have "HUNDREDS OF TOWERS OPERATIONAL" during the time period of the 2011 National Convention -- EIGHTEEN MONTHS AGO. I know that because Shepard said so. I quoted him in my RB Post# 198341 on March 3, 2011:
"OUR DELTA SITE IS BUSTLING WITH ACTIVITY AS THE GOAL OF GETTING HUNDREDS OF TOWERS OPERATIONAL BY SUMMER GOES ON"
Doesn't it seem strange that we didn't hear any of the convention attendees expressing concern about the *verifiable* fact they only had NINETEEN towers "up" -- not HUNDREDS?
They didn't seem to care. They just kept right on selling "systems" to friends, family, neighbors, teachers, coaches, etc.
It's almost like all those upper tier "team members" who attended the National Convention know this is a never-ending process, but they don't care as long as they can continue taking their bogus tax credits and earn their sales commissions.
You know, that doesn't seem quite fair to the people they are selling to.
Hey, all you believers out there ... do you have anything to add to this conversation?
TED
New pictures of the pilot plant and manufacturing facility have been posted.
Some of them are blurry because they were zoomed in from a distance with an inexpensive camera (hey, what do you want for free?)
Those who need a good chuckle should check out the picture at the following link:
Pilot Plant Pictures
The picture shows the tower (in the left foreground) that was 10 feet too short, so they had to add another "tube" at the top. It still has its pod framework sitting on the ground. Perhaps the added top "tube" can't handle the weight?
The picture also shows the tower (in the left background) that still has only 3 pods on it, because the tracking system (or the wind?) broke one of them completely off.
The picture also shows the tower (on the right) that, according to RaPower3.com, "The turbine is now up on one tower and attached to a heat exchanger and generator."
The picture also shows that both of the only TWO towers with their pods elevated have their pod framework parallel to the ground. That means they will only be able to generate heat when the sun is directly overhead. Like, noon'ish. There are pictures where you can see shadows being cast by various objects, so it obviously isn't noon'ish. That means the tracking system isn't working. You can get an idea of where the sun is in the sky by looking at the shadows in the picture of the red gate (PIC013).
And, finally, ZERO pods have any of the newly redesigned "framed" lenses installed.
According to RaPower3.com, "the R&D has been completed".
Considering the above *verifiable* evidence, does ANYBODY really believe "R&D has been completed"?
Hey, all you "cult members" ... are you ready to take legal action against your "cult leaders" yet?
Sure is a pretty day.
TED
New pilot plant pictures:
http://www.IAUSenergy.com/Pics/Delta/Jan_2012/index.html
Sure is a pretty day.
TED
re: You know anyone can send them emails
Fascinating. Thanks for the enlightenment.
I figured since you were already in contact with them, you would get a more timely and more accurate response than somebody they had never heard of before. Funny how that works.
Frankly, I think they have made a correct decision to "fulfill contracts" with technology that doesn't "belong" to IAS.
TED
Ask them if the "appropriate information" will include the same technology that they had been referencing since last July.
That technology "belongs" to International Automated Systems (IAUS.PK). It is being marketed MLM style. Multiple Level Marketing.
See: http://ragingbull.quote.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=IAUS&read=192260
IAS, by the way, was supposed to "finish construction" on a solar pilot plant back in Q1 of 2006. It *still* hasn't been completed.
There are lots of "interesting" details about all this. IAS has had a history of "interesting" deals.
TED
Solar info deleted
All the info on "a unique solar technology that is half the cost of traditional systems" has been deleted from Carbon Jungle's website.
It used to be at:
http://www.carbonjungle.us/products/solar.htm
http://www.carbonjungle.us/downloads/solar.pdf
Dang it! I should have gotten out while the getting was good. I suspected there was something flaky going on when I didn't get my last paid basher check.
TED
I wouldn't want anybody to miss out on IAS' 10KSB.
Even though it's a couple of weeks late, it has some interesting info in it.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/820380/000109690607001391/ias10ksb063007.htm
Enjoy !!
TED
Uh ... guys ...
That article was from Feb 15, 2006. Not 2007.
There was no 8K filed on it back then, either.
IAUS has an "interesting" history associated with it. If I were you, I would read it very carefully prior to investing any large amounts of money into IAUS.
TED
HNY back atcha, Janice!
Say, I'm getting tired of all the same old hypesters and the same old over-hyped stocks.
Note that I resisted the urge to say "over-hyped SCAMS" ... I guess I'm mellowing in my old age.
I need to find a new challenge. Any good ones you know that aren't already infested by a bunch of those nasty bashers?
TED
"highly automated solution for date conversion" ?
Well, heck ... if they can make it "highly automated", then surely they can expend a little extra effort to go the extra mile and make it "FULLY AUTOMATED" ... right?
Soon as I hear of a company with sumthin' like that ... I'm IN !!
TED
Y2K ?? What's that?
Hank McNabb is STILL wrong --
On 11/8/2002, during FSTW's hypefest when the stock got way ahead of its underlying value, Hank McNabb (FSTW vocal supporter), told us he would get back to us in 9 months to let us know "who Richard proves right".
The stock corrected strongly after the next quarterly report and hasn't recovered yet. It dropped from 22'ish to 14'ish in one day. It's now just under $2.
Still waiting for you to tell us "who Richard proves right", Hanky ...
Come on, Hanky. Be a man. Admit you were wrong and apologize to all those you ridiculed and cursed at for disagreeing with you.
Or, maybe you think ... it's different this time ... just like you said back then ??
LOL, VBG, etc ...
Your bestest-ever buddy,
TED
SEC regs violation --
Still no press release or 8-K on the departure of a senior officer at FSTW (Jeff Longoria, Senior VP of Sales). According to a Press Release by c360, he started there on Sept 1, which means his last day at FSTW would have been Aug 31 at the latest. There have been 4 business days since then (Monday, Sept 5, was a holiday).
According to the SEC regs, "Companies have four days to file a Form 8-K for the events specified in the items in Sections 1-5 and 9".
Section 5 includes "Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Principal Officers"
No 8-K has been filed regarding Longoria. Thus, FSTW is now out of compliance with SEC regs.
Quotes above taken from:
http://www.sec.gov/answers/form8k.htm
Also, the rumor grapevine says that another senior office, Judi Vitale (Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) has been working in a part-time capacity for a few months. However, there was no news disseminated regarding that status change. It would seem reasonable that her employment agreement would have been amended to account for that change. According to this FAQ on the SEC site, an 8-K should have been filed after that amendment.
********
Question 6
Q: If a registrant enters into or amends an employment agreement with a named executive officer or a director, is disclosure required under Item 1.01?
A: Yes. If a registrant enters into an employment agreement with a director or an executive officer who is a "named executive officer," as that term is defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K, or enters into any amendment of such agreement that is material to the registrant, then the registrant must file a Form 8-K under Item 1.01, unless the employment agreement or amendment to the employment agreement is not required to be disclosed under Item 601(b)(10)(iii)(C) of Regulation S-K. The registrant must file an Item 5.02(c) Form 8-K if the officer is newly appointed to one of the positions specified in that Item.
********
http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/form8kfaq.htm
Happy 44th Anniversary !!
On 11/8/2002, during FSTW's hypefest when the stock got way ahead of its underlying value, Hank McNabb (FSTW vocal supporter), told us he would get back to us in 9 months to let us know "who Richard proves right".
The stock corrected strongly after the next quarterly report.
Still waiting for you to tell us "who Richard proves right", Hanky ...
Come on, Hanky. Be a man. Admit you were wrong and apologize to all those you ridiculed and cursed at for disagreeing with you.
Or, maybe you think ... it's different this time ... just like you said back then ??
LOL, VBG, etc ...
Your bestest-ever buddy,
TED
Happy 43rd Anniversary !!!
On 11/8/2002, during FSTW's hypefest when the stock got way ahead of its underlying value, Hank McNabb (FSTW vocal supporter), told us he would get back to us in 9 months to let us know "who Richard proves right".
Still waiting, Hanky ...
Come on, Hanky. Be a man. Admit you were wrong and apologize to all those you ridiculed and cursed at for disagreeing with you.
Or, maybe you think ... it's different this time ... just like you said back then ??
LOL, VBG, etc ...
Your bestest-ever buddy,
TED
2005's Q1 10-Q shows a loss of $0.30.
The really bad news is that License revenues were only $82,000.
The obese female is singing her heart out.
Hank McNabb ... YOU WERE WRONG ... REPENT !!
NT-10K notice of late filing
From Form 12b-25, filed 4/1/2005
Firstwave Technologies, Inc. (“Registrant”) is in the process of compiling and reviewing the financial information to be included in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. This process could not be completed by the date required without incurring unreasonable effort and expense. The Registrant is re-evaluating the assumptions utilized at year-end to evaluate certain significant intangibles, including goodwill. The Registrant expects to file its Form 10-K within the fifteen days provided by this Form 12b-25.
[...snip...]
Notwithstanding any changes resulting from the evaluation indicated above in Part III, current estimates comparing 2004 to 2003 show a decrease of 38% in total revenues from $11,904,000 to $7,400,000, and an increase in net loss applicable to common shareholders from $996,000 to $4,143,000. In addition to reduced revenues, the increase in the net loss included a $711,000 write-off of previously capitalized software development costs, a $153,000 rent expense for abandoned office space, and a reserve of $240,000 for surplus third party products. If a determination is made to establish a change to intangibles, those changes will impact the above numbers. The Registrant does not anticipate any restatement of prior period financial statements that it filed on Forms 10-Q and 10-K due to this evaluation. Complete details will be explained in Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Form 10-K.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/897078/000116796605000517/t5644_nt10k.htm
Filed on 4/1/2005 at 5:26pm EST
Yeah, right ... and you believe that.
I use one and ONLY one alias.
So, how's that multi-million dollar deal coming along?
Or, was it multi BILLION ??
What's a zero or 3 among friends?
Beware of fraudulent SPAM
If you read on another thread about a $120mil contract awarded to FSTW for Wembley Stadium, beware that there has been a concerted effort by a bunch of con artists to artificially raise the price of this stock.
Do your own Due Diligence. Don't let these crooks take your money.
Click on the following link to see where the fraudulent message was spammed to several boards. All they did was change the name of the company awarding the "contract".
http://search.messages.yahoo.com/search/messages?tag_M=fstw&fname_M=txt_comment
TED
Check out messages on the following Yahoo boards for a similar message about $240MM contract being awarded to FSTW. Only difference in the message is the company name that awarded the contract. This would be funny if it weren't illegal.
ISON,ELN,STEM,EBAY,SIRI,IBM,CSCO,GOOG,TASR,INTC,MSFT,SUNW
But, considering the content of the message I'm replying to, which just so happened to be on the day of an earlier "Daytrader Shenanigans" party, I suspect you knew exactly what was going on.
If so ... tsk, tsk, tsk ...
TED
Right ... on no news. Doesn't that seem a bit odd?
There were a ton of spam messages on other threads and chat boards about their billion dollar contract. Which doesn't exist.
If you were able to take advantage of an unjustified rise in FSTW's price, good for you.
If you really had no idea of the daytrader shenanigans, you're probably still holding. If so, I suggest you strongly consider selling. Soon.
TED
ahhh .. resorting to personal attacks.
Always a terrific way to drum up support for your cause.
TED
re: FSTW
re: got into some FSTW..its trading very very actively
Oh, I get it. You got sucked into the daytrader shenanigans 1/28/2005, the day the stock ranged from $1.57 to $2.50 on 558,000 shares.
Typically, the stock trades around 10,000 shares. Yesterday, it traded 9,200 shares and closed at $1.58.
So, you mentioned what a terrific opportunity FSTW now because want somebody to buy you out of your position, right?
You're lucky you didn't get sucked into the daytrader shenanigans back in November. The stock had better than a $3 swing that day.
If you think the "Wemley" stadium is a profitable project, you didn't do very much DD.
FSTW: Avoid ... IMO.
TED
re: FSTW
The time of that post on Yahoo was within 1/2 hour of the time of your post here. What a coincidence !!
just wrapped up my DD on this company and talked to my IT guy at work to ask him abt what he thinks about FSTW's product. He rates FSTW's CRM solutions as one of the best in the industry, and he says that demand is increasing including his own company is putting negotiating working with FSTW's solutions. Some solid potential here.
http://messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=FN&action=m&board=4687996&tid=fstw&sid=4687996&...
Ooops ... Delete this message ...
Happy 27th anniversary, Hank!
Nov 8, 2002 you said "I'll get back with you in 9 months to see who Richard proves right".
Still waiting for you to get back and let us know who Richard proved right, Hank!
Hank, how convenient that you disappeared from the threads shortly before the Q1 2003 financials were released, so you wouldn't be around to take abuse from other posters telling you that you were wrong ... like the abuse you doled out when the stock was way overpriced and you thought you were right. It's almost like you knew a bad report was on the way. You didn't know that, did you Hank? I sure hope not. That would require inside info. The SEC frowns on that stuff, you know.
You're a jerk, Hank. Admit you were wrong, and apologize to all those you ridiculed, laughed at and cursed at, simply for having opinions different from yours. Opinions, as it turns out, that were right.
Haven't seen any VBGs from you since you were proven wrong, Hank. Why is that?
According to you, Hank, "it's different this time". Wrong again ... still !!!
You know, if you don't admit to being wrong soon, I just might tire of this game and quit reminding you every month.
But not for another 25 years or so ...
TED
Firstwave Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results for 2004
Tuesday February 8, 4:00 pm ET
ATLANTA, Feb. 8 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Firstwave Technologies, Inc. (Nasdaq: FSTW - News), a leading provider of industry-focused CRM solutions, is announcing today its financial results for the fourth quarter and for the year ended December 31, 2004. The Company reported its first quarter-over-quarter increase in cash balance since the fourth quarter of 2002, not including the effects of cash received from the issuance of preferred stock in the second quarter of 2004. The Company reported a cash balance of $1,286,000, after repaying its bank line of credit, compared to a balance of $1,273,000 as of September 30, 2004, which included $500,000 in borrowings under the bank line.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Company's net loss for the fourth quarter of 2004 was $1,968,000 compared to a net loss of $640,000 for the fourth quarter of 2003. The basic net loss per share was $0.73 for the fourth quarter of 2004 compared with basic net loss of $0.24 per share for the fourth quarter of 2003.
One-time write-offs amounting to approximately $951,000, or $0.35 per share, were taken in the fourth quarter of 2004, including the expensing of the discontinuance of certain products and other surplus third party products. The Company also recorded a charge for unused office space of approximately $153,000, or $0.06 per share.
Software license revenues for the fourth quarter of 2004 decreased 19.4% to $646,000 compared with $801,000 for the fourth quarter of 2003. Services revenues for the fourth quarter of 2004 were $401,000 compared to $721,000 in the fourth quarter of 2003, representing a 44.4% decrease. The Company's total maintenance revenues for the fourth quarter of 2004 decreased 10% to $649,000 from $721,000 for the fourth quarter of the prior year. Total revenues for the fourth quarter of 2004 were $1,708,000 compared with $2,264,000 for the fourth quarter of 2003, representing a 24.6% decrease.
For the full year 2004, software license revenues decreased 39.2% to $2,322,000 compared with $3,820,000 for the full year 2003. Services revenues in 2004 were $2,316,000 compared to $5,423,000 in 2003, representing a 57.3% decrease. The Company's total maintenance revenues in 2004 increased 2.1% to $2,662,000 from $2,608,000 for the prior year. Total revenues for 2004 were $7,400,000 compared with $11,904,000 for 2003, representing a 37.8% decrease. For the full year 2004, net loss was $4,143,000, or $1.54 per basic share, as compared to a net loss of $996,000, or $0.39 loss per basic share, for the year ended December 31, 2003.
"While we are disappointed in our results for the quarter and the year, we feel we have made progress and have learned from our experiences in the Sports market," said Richard T. Brock, Firstwave chairman and CEO. "We will focus our efforts in areas where we have had clear success. We go into 2005 with a strong pipeline of prospects in both the High Technology and Sports Markets and with a strong backlog of professional services from customers."
Firstwave will hold its fourth quarter and full year earnings conference call today, February 8, 2005, at 4:45 P.M. EST. To participate in the call from the United States and Canada, please dial 866-238-1640 approximately five minutes prior to the start time. To participate in the call from outside the United States and Canada, please dial 703-639-1161 five minutes prior to the start time. Two hours after the completion of the conference call, a digital recording of the call will be available for seven days, and can be accessed by dialing 888-266-2081 from inside the United States and Canada and 703-925-2533 from outside the United States and Canada and entering the Conference passcode 641525.
The call also will be simultaneously broadcast live over the Internet, where it can be accessed at http://viavid.net/dce.aspx?sid=00002229 or www.firstwave.net beginning at 4:30 P.M. EST. The online archive of the broadcast will be available within one hour of the live call at www.firstwave.net , where it will remain available for a period of twelve months. Please allow extra time prior to the call to visit the broadcast website and download the streaming media software required to listen to the Internet broadcast.
About Firstwave
Firstwave(R) Technologies, Inc. is a global provider of strategic CRM solutions specifically designed for the Sports and High Tech industries. Firstwave's solutions provide companies with fit-to-purpose features that optimize how companies win, maintain and grow customer and organizational relationships while improving the overall customer experience. With 20 years of experience in CRM, Firstwave's legacy of CRM best practices and Customer- First Commitment has earned the Company numerous industry awards and accolades. Firstwave is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. For more information, visit the Company's web site at www.firstwave.net or call 1-800- 540-6061.
NOTE: Except for historical information contained herein, the matters set forth in this communication are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of various provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by words such as will, expect, intends, believe, anticipates, should and words of similar meaning. Firstwave Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") notes that the forward-looking statements set forth above involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from any such statement, such as potential fluctuations in quarterly results due to delays in purchase decisions and other adverse market conditions, whether the Company will be able to continue diversification of its revenues, competition and technological developments, the Company's capital requirements and other liquidity concerns, the Company's ability to continue to comply with NASDAQ listing requirements, and the size, timing, and contractual terms of orders, and also the risks and uncertainties discussed under the caption "Certain Factors Affecting Forward-Looking Statements" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), which discussions are incorporated herein by this reference. The information set forth herein is provided as of the date hereof. The Company does not assume, and expressly disclaims, any duty or obligation to update any of the information presented herein with respect to its consolidated operations or anticipated performance in 2005 or beyond.
Firstwave Technologies, Inc.
Selected Financial Information
(in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statement of Operations For the For the
Three Months Twelve Months
Ended Ended
Dec 31, Dec 31,
(unaudited)
2003 2004 2003 2004
Revenues $2,264 $1,708 $11,904 $7,400
Operating loss (581) (1,924) (799) (3,905)
Loss before income taxes (584) (1,897) (774) (3,888)
Loss after taxes $(584) $(1,897) $(775) $(3,888)
Dividends on preferred stock (56) (71) (221) (255)
Net loss applicable to
common shareholders $(640) $(1,968) $(996) $(4,143)
Basic:
Loss per share $(0.24) $(0.73) $(0.39) $(1.54)
Weighted average shares 2,672 2,694 2,572 2,682
Diluted:
Loss per share $(0.24) $(0.73) $(0.39) $(1.54)
Weighted average shares 2,672 2,694 2,572 2,682
Consolidated Balance Sheet Dec 31, Dec 31,
2003 2004
Cash $2,704 $1,286
AR and other current assets 2,221 1,170
Total current assets $4,925 $2,456
Long term assets 6,882 4,567
Total assets $11,807 $7,023
Current liabilities $3,438 $2,424
Shareholders' equity 8,369 4,599
Total liabilities and shareholders'
equity $11,807 $7,023
FSTW Investors and Investor-wannabe's might find the series of 9 posts I wrote on the Yahoo board interesting.
Subject matter: Arena Football League
http://finance.messages.yahoo.com/bbs?.mm=FN&action=m&board=4687996&tid=fstw&sid=468...
FSTW posts $0.29 loss in Q3 of 2004
http://www.firstwave.net/Company/NewsEvents_Press_View.cfm?pr_id=301
Hey, Hank McNabb ... you were WRONG !!
TED