this "Marketplace awareness campaign" has failed epicly, and we should see some major dumping soon.

doughboy2 Member Profile doughboy2 Member Level

Share
Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:56:27 PM
Re: Ichimoku post# 261487
Post # of 261503
"Well some volume and interest is a good thing

More eyeballs"

Except if it's N, then it's "dumping", no doubt.

Who can listen to joe talk for an hour?

I am getting through it in 10 minute intervals.

Uninspiring so far.

that second doc you posted - joe says scott martin does not have deans A's.

If he didn't have them, how did he vote them?

(Joe Canouse) I have a copy of my cert ; scott does?t have a copy of Deans

(1) One or more shareholders may create a voting trust, conferring on a trustee the right to vote or otherwise act for them, by signing an agreement setting out the provisions of the trust and by transferring their shares to the trustee. When a voting trust agreement is signed, the trustee shall prepare a list of the names and addresses of all owners of beneficial interests in the trust, together with the number and class of shares each transferred to the trust, and promptly cause the corporation to receive copies of the list and agreement. Thereafter, the trustee shall cause the corporation to receive changes to the list promptly as they occur and amendments to the agreement promptly as they are made.

(2) A voting trust becomes effective on the date the first shares subject to the trust are registered in the trustee's name. A voting trust is valid for not more than ten years after its effective date unless extended under subsection (3) of this section.

(3) All or some of the parties to a voting trust may extend it for additional terms of not more than ten years each by signing an extension agreement and obtaining the trustee's written consent to the extension. An extension is valid for not more than ten years after the date the first shareholder signs the extension agreement, unless such signing occurs within two years before the expiration date of the voting trust as originally fixed or as last extended, in which case the extension is valid for not more than ten years after the expiration date of the voting trust as originally fixed or last extended. The trustee shall cause the corporation to receive copies of the extension agreement. An extension agreement binds only those parties signing it.

The company has looked and stated they are part of some docs that were stolen! and my opinion is that post was worthless

Czarnik served an essential role in these illegal offerings. He churned out bogus opinion letters predicated on the Promoters' alleged representations to him that they are buy-and hold investors. In fact, Czarnik knew that they had no intention of holding the stock, but that they intended to nationally advertise the stock and quickly dump their shares into the public market for millions of dollars. Czarnik knew or was severely reckless in not knowing that the Promoters intended to distribute the stock to the public and that the transfer agent would rely on his letters and issue stock certificates without restrictive legends.

From:
Mike Kendrick <MKendrick@mineseeker.com>
Add to Contacts
To: xxx xxx<xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx>
Hi xxx, please forgive me for not fully replying but rather attaching a copy of a not to two other QASP shareholders. I hope this is OK . If you have any further question, feel free to ask.



Disclaimer - June 27, 2011
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for xxx. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might not represent those of . Warning: Although has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.
From: Mike Kendrick
Sent: 27 June 2011 17:28
To: 'xxx'
Cc: 'xxx'
Subject: Update

Hi xxx, I have given some thought to your predicament and felt it about time you had an explanation. I have also copied this to xxx, given his email to me of today.
Regards,

Dear xxx,

Thank you for the reply. I do understand your position and I have tried to help and accommodate the QASP shareholders.
Let me explain how.
Firstly, you must understand that we were let down very badly by QASP. They stopped the agreed funding, suddenly and without notice, at a critical time in our programme. This caused enormous damage to our progress – right in the middle of our Croatia demonstration.
On top of that disappointment, some of the QASP shareholders were making libellous claims against us on a public forum. Others were contacting the Croatian authorities to check on our bonifides and not believing we were even in Croatia. One contacted the company of our partner, who passed away suddenly on the basis that we may have made up that story. Incredibly distasteful and unprofessional.
So, at that point, I think you will understand why we wanted nothing to do with QASP. We were being slandered and QASP had reneged on the deal. The contract states quite clearly that the payments were non returnable options.
It then became apparent that Joe Canouse may sue Mineseeker for the $1.7 million that QASP had paid to Mineseeker. In fairness to Joe, he told us he had not seen the agreements and knew of no non-returnable options. We sent Joe copies of the documents two weeks ago and on the 17th of June he acknowledged that he had not seen them before and that they ‘ shed light on your perspective’. Joe's claims were further complicated by Dean Bradley who has written to the Mineseeker stating that much of the cash advanced, came from him personally, not from QASP. The stated that the QASP books did not show any money due from Mineseeker and that we owned him the money. The statement that no debt by Mineseeker was in the books came at a time when Dean was, undisputedly ( I think) the president of QASP.

However, Jeff DiGenova, argued long and hard for the QASP shareholders, stating that many had lost money – some their life savings- and some had only invested as they believed in Mineseeker. This persuaded me that we should take another look at this situation and I offered QASP 4% of common stock in our public entity.
The sequence of events was as follows;
We received several offers to merge with Trophy, from Dean Bradley who explained that he and Joe Canuse owned the company (Trophy) and they would like to work with us.
We met Joe Canuse, Dean Bradley and Donna Virgil during our most recent visit to Jacksonville. I agreed to this meeting on the basis that QASP would not be discussed. We were only listening to an offer from Trophy. We took the details of this offer to our legal counsel who, like ourselves, questioned the legality and ethics of the proposed arrangement. Joe wrote to us formally with this offer which we rejected. We were surprised that these confidential conversations and proposed agreements were emailed to other parties. The details of that breach are being held for future action, if and when necessary.
We made an in good faith offer to QASP, via Joe on the above described 4% of common stock. I assume Joe put this to the QASP shareholders. He did not reply to us formally, although he informed by telephone that it was of no interest. We wrote back to him informing him that the offer was open until 21st of June. We received no response and the offer lapsed.

It seems to me that a section of QASP shareholders are determined, at all cost, to spoil any attempt by NHSH to make a deal with Mineseeker, although, the arrangement would obviously be to the advantage of most . Now, an attack on Dan DiGenova, a young man making his way in life, is subjected to vicious rumours and attacks on his personal integrity. I can tell you that we consider Dan to be a fine young man and our DD would have quickly picked up any questionable behaviour on his part. We have received the shareholders registry related documents and will have warrants to support them. The accusation is obviously false and is simply designed to cause damage to the main body of QASP shareholders, while benefiting one or two.
As far as the accusations against Mineseeker and me personally, we are in the process of subpoenaing a website, Investors Hub, to identify the perpetrators of many false and malicious statements.
I am not in the habit of writing long diatribes but felt this story should be set on record.

Please feel free to post this anywhere you wish. I would be happy to respond to any sensible questions.




Mike Kendrick
Founder.

The Mineseeker Foundation.
The Control Tower. Wolverhampton Business Airport.
Bobbington. Stourbridge. DY7 5DY
T. 01384 904020.
M. 07802 395969
www.mineseeker.org. www.mineseeker.com. www.thesoleofarica.za.org


www.thesoleofarica.za.org

From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 9:41 AM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Cc: 'Donnell Vigil'
Subject: Legal Opinion

Dear Craig

Thank you for agreeing to write the legal opinion required from Computershare. I have copied Donnell Vigil who is our corporate secretary and will be sending you everything you need.
If you can do it by Monday that would be great.

best regards,

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259




From: Craig Huffman <craig@dslgpa.com>
To: ' Joe Canouse ' <joe@thinkpinkllc.com>
Cc: 'Donnell Vigil' <donnell_vigil@yahoo.com>; ' Craig A. Huffman ' <Craig@securuslawgroup.com>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 8:01 PM
Subject: QASP Reverse
Joe,

I saw when I received the paperwork that QASP is a Colorado Company. As such you fall under Colorado Business Corporation Act. Specifically, to effect a reverse stock division it is governed by Section 7-106-105. Under that section, which I have copied below, you must obtain shareholder approval, with notice to all common stock class members, and approval from a shareholder meeting.

I reviewed the QASR Articles of Incorporation, including the latest changes, and there is nothing that allows this to be done without shareholder approval. I am sorry, but I don't see how this is done, unless you have a shareholder meeting/vote first. Let me know what you want to do.

7-106-105. Reverse stock split. (1) Unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, the outstanding shares of a class or series may be reduced to a lesser number of shares by a reverse split made on the terms set forth in this section.

(2) To effect the reverse split , each outstanding share of the class or series shall be divided by the same divisor as is every other such share.

(3) Each share of the class or series shall have, after the reverse split , such par value, if any, as may be stated in the articles of incorporation.

(4) If the articles of incorporation are to be amended in connection with the reverse split, whether to change the number of authorized shares of such class or series or the par value, if any, of the shares of such class or series or for any other reason, such amendment shall be effected pursuant to article 110 of this title.

(5) In lieu of issuing fractional shares upon such reverse split , the corporation may take any of the actions provided for in section 7-106-104.

(6) For the reverse split to be effected:

(a) The board of directors shall recommend the reverse split to the holders of shares of the class or series that is to be reverse split and to each other voting group that is entitled, by reason of any provision in the articles of incorporation, to vote on the reverse split, unless the board of directors determines that, because of conflict of interest or other special circumstances, it should make no recommendation and communicates the basis for its determination to the shareholders with the submission of the reverse split; and

(b) The holders of shares of the class or series that is to be reverse split , and each other voting group that is entitled, by reason of any provision in the articles of incorporation, to vote on the reverse split , shall approve the reverse split .

(7) The board of directors may condition the effectiveness of the reverse split on any basis.

(8) The corporation shall give notice, in accordance with section 7-107-105, to each shareholder entitled to vote on the reverse split , of the shareholders' meeting at which the reverse split will be voted upon. The notice of the meeting shall state that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is to consider the reverse split , and the notice shall contain or be accompanied by a copy or a summary of the reverse split .

(9) Unless articles 101 to 117 of this title, the articles of incorporation, bylaws adopted by the shareholders, or the proposing board of directors require a greater vote, the reverse split shall be approved by the votes required by sections 7-107-206 and 7-107-207 by every voting group entitled to vote on the reverse split.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com





From: Donnell Vigil [mailto:donnell_vigil@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 11:47 AM
To: Craig Huffman ; ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; Donnell_Vigil@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: QASP Reverse

Craig:

Please find attached a copy of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation that Quasar is filing today with the Colorado Secretary of State. This amendment incorporates the following language which conforms with Quasar's corporate Bylaws.

"Except as may otherwise be provided by the Colorado Business Corporation Act, any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders may be taken without a meeting if, before or after the action, a written consent thereto is signed by stockholders holding at least a majority of the voting power; provided that if a different proportion of voting power is required for such an action at a meeting, then that proportion of written consents is required. In no instance where action is authorized by written consent need a meeting of stockholders be called or noticed." Article I, p. 1

Quasar's Bylaws were published to the public on May 19, 2009 (see www.otcmarkets.com/stock/QASP/financials). The foregoing language was omitted in error in our previous filing and in order to conform to our Bylaws we will amended our articles to comply.

In accordance with Quasar's Bylaws and our newly Amended Articles of Incorporation, Quasar should have the right to conduct a reverse split with a written consent thereto signed by stockholders with majority of the voting power without needing a meeting.

Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,

Donnell J. Vigil
Corporate Secretary & Director
Quasar Aerospace Industries, Inc.
9300 Normandy Blvd., Suite 502
Jacksonville, FL 32221
(904) 589-1894 - cell
(904) 378-3259 - office



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 9:07 PM
To: 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Reverse

Joe and Donnell,

This is proving complicated, however you got over the shareholder approval hurdle. Can someone send me the resolution for the reverse. I seem to have everything else but that. It was not on file with Colorado that I saw.

Minor detail ... Please send so I can finish this by tomorrow.

Joe, you and I need to talk tomorrow about this please.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 9:20 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Reverse

Ok will call...donnell pls forward the resolution

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259




From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:03 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '; 'Donnell Vigil'
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: QASP Opinion

Joe and Donnell,

Attached is the opinion for the reverse division for Computershare. Joe , I would still like to talk to you. I tried your office today but didnt get through. Too many choices were Canouses that were not you on the phone menu.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:05 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Opinion

Sorry I will figure out my direct number
The extension is 222
The cell is 404-444-7855
I will call you in the morning unless you have a better time to suggest

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 7:13 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: Invoice for QASP Opinion

Jose,

Attached is the invoice for the reverse division opinion for the Quasar corporate action for Computershare. The amount of the initial quote was really small compared to all that went into this and the extensive litigation. Normally this type of fee would be $3k plus given all at hand. I only increased the quote by $500. Let me know what else is needed. Anything for Pinksheets I will have my associate do it quickly.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 2:31 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Ken Tomchin '; tomfavata03=40aol.com@pi8ip6be6-3cf5icqf.r-v5.readnotify.com; tomchin@tomchinandodom.com
Subject: RE: Invoice for QASP Opinion

CRAIG PLEASE CALL ME ON MY MOBILE PHONE AS AN INDIVIDUAL ATTACHED, MR. TOM FARTVALTA, IS MAKING CLAIMS THAT HE AND A GENTLEMAN NAMED MARREK OZGOODWA HAVE ENGAGED YOU TO SUE ME.

AS YOU KNOW YOU AND I HAVE SPOKEN ABOUT A SIMILAR SUIT ON MY BEHALF AS WELL AS MR. JAMES OWENS AND YOU HAVE BEEN ENGAGED BY QUASAR AS WELL WHICH I AM THE CEO OF

PLEASE CALL TO DISCUSS AT 404-444-7855

BEST REGARDS,

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 7:15 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Ken Tomchin '; tomfavata03=40aol.com@pi8ip6be6-3cf5icqf.r-v5.readnotify.com; tomchin@tomchinandodom.com; ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: Invoice for QASP Opinion

Joe,

For the record I have not been retained, nor my firm for any such lawsuit. That is incorrect and such representations should not be made by any party.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com

Czarnik served an essential role in these illegal offerings. He churned out bogus opinion letters predicated on the Promoters' alleged representations to him that they are buy-and hold investors. In fact, Czarnik knew that they had no intention of holding the stock, but that they intended to nationally advertise the stock and quickly dump their shares into the public market for millions of dollars. Czarnik knew or was severely reckless in not knowing that the Promoters intended to distribute the stock to the public and that the transfer agent would rely on his letters and issue stock certificates without restrictive legends.

From:
Mike Kendrick <MKendrick@mineseeker.com>
Add to Contacts
To: xxx xxx<xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx>
Hi xxx, please forgive me for not fully replying but rather attaching a copy of a not to two other QASP shareholders. I hope this is OK . If you have any further question, feel free to ask.



Disclaimer - June 27, 2011
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for xxx. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might not represent those of . Warning: Although has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.
From: Mike Kendrick
Sent: 27 June 2011 17:28
To: 'xxx'
Cc: 'xxx'
Subject: Update

Hi xxx, I have given some thought to your predicament and felt it about time you had an explanation. I have also copied this to xxx, given his email to me of today.
Regards,

Dear xxx,

Thank you for the reply. I do understand your position and I have tried to help and accommodate the QASP shareholders.
Let me explain how.
Firstly, you must understand that we were let down very badly by QASP. They stopped the agreed funding, suddenly and without notice, at a critical time in our programme. This caused enormous damage to our progress – right in the middle of our Croatia demonstration.
On top of that disappointment, some of the QASP shareholders were making libellous claims against us on a public forum. Others were contacting the Croatian authorities to check on our bonifides and not believing we were even in Croatia. One contacted the company of our partner, who passed away suddenly on the basis that we may have made up that story. Incredibly distasteful and unprofessional.
So, at that point, I think you will understand why we wanted nothing to do with QASP. We were being slandered and QASP had reneged on the deal. The contract states quite clearly that the payments were non returnable options.
It then became apparent that Joe Canouse may sue Mineseeker for the $1.7 million that QASP had paid to Mineseeker. In fairness to Joe, he told us he had not seen the agreements and knew of no non-returnable options. We sent Joe copies of the documents two weeks ago and on the 17th of June he acknowledged that he had not seen them before and that they ‘ shed light on your perspective’. Joe's claims were further complicated by Dean Bradley who has written to the Mineseeker stating that much of the cash advanced, came from him personally, not from QASP. The stated that the QASP books did not show any money due from Mineseeker and that we owned him the money. The statement that no debt by Mineseeker was in the books came at a time when Dean was, undisputedly ( I think) the president of QASP.

However, Jeff DiGenova, argued long and hard for the QASP shareholders, stating that many had lost money – some their life savings- and some had only invested as they believed in Mineseeker. This persuaded me that we should take another look at this situation and I offered QASP 4% of common stock in our public entity.
The sequence of events was as follows;
We received several offers to merge with Trophy, from Dean Bradley who explained that he and Joe Canuse owned the company (Trophy) and they would like to work with us.
We met Joe Canuse, Dean Bradley and Donna Virgil during our most recent visit to Jacksonville. I agreed to this meeting on the basis that QASP would not be discussed. We were only listening to an offer from Trophy. We took the details of this offer to our legal counsel who, like ourselves, questioned the legality and ethics of the proposed arrangement. Joe wrote to us formally with this offer which we rejected. We were surprised that these confidential conversations and proposed agreements were emailed to other parties. The details of that breach are being held for future action, if and when necessary.
We made an in good faith offer to QASP, via Joe on the above described 4% of common stock. I assume Joe put this to the QASP shareholders. He did not reply to us formally, although he informed by telephone that it was of no interest. We wrote back to him informing him that the offer was open until 21st of June. We received no response and the offer lapsed.

It seems to me that a section of QASP shareholders are determined, at all cost, to spoil any attempt by NHSH to make a deal with Mineseeker, although, the arrangement would obviously be to the advantage of most . Now, an attack on Dan DiGenova, a young man making his way in life, is subjected to vicious rumours and attacks on his personal integrity. I can tell you that we consider Dan to be a fine young man and our DD would have quickly picked up any questionable behaviour on his part. We have received the shareholders registry related documents and will have warrants to support them. The accusation is obviously false and is simply designed to cause damage to the main body of QASP shareholders, while benefiting one or two.
As far as the accusations against Mineseeker and me personally, we are in the process of subpoenaing a website, Investors Hub, to identify the perpetrators of many false and malicious statements.
I am not in the habit of writing long diatribes but felt this story should be set on record.

Please feel free to post this anywhere you wish. I would be happy to respond to any sensible questions.




Mike Kendrick
Founder.

The Mineseeker Foundation.
The Control Tower. Wolverhampton Business Airport.
Bobbington. Stourbridge. DY7 5DY
T. 01384 904020.
M. 07802 395969
www.mineseeker.org. www.mineseeker.com. www.thesoleofarica.za.org


www.thesoleofarica.za.org

From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 9:41 AM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Cc: 'Donnell Vigil'
Subject: Legal Opinion

Dear Craig

Thank you for agreeing to write the legal opinion required from Computershare. I have copied Donnell Vigil who is our corporate secretary and will be sending you everything you need.
If you can do it by Monday that would be great.

best regards,

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259




From: Craig Huffman <craig@dslgpa.com>
To: ' Joe Canouse ' <joe@thinkpinkllc.com>
Cc: 'Donnell Vigil' <donnell_vigil@yahoo.com>; ' Craig A. Huffman ' <Craig@securuslawgroup.com>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 8:01 PM
Subject: QASP Reverse
Joe,

I saw when I received the paperwork that QASP is a Colorado Company. As such you fall under Colorado Business Corporation Act. Specifically, to effect a reverse stock division it is governed by Section 7-106-105. Under that section, which I have copied below, you must obtain shareholder approval, with notice to all common stock class members, and approval from a shareholder meeting.

I reviewed the QASR Articles of Incorporation, including the latest changes, and there is nothing that allows this to be done without shareholder approval. I am sorry, but I don't see how this is done, unless you have a shareholder meeting/vote first. Let me know what you want to do.

7-106-105. Reverse stock split. (1) Unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, the outstanding shares of a class or series may be reduced to a lesser number of shares by a reverse split made on the terms set forth in this section.

(2) To effect the reverse split , each outstanding share of the class or series shall be divided by the same divisor as is every other such share.

(3) Each share of the class or series shall have, after the reverse split , such par value, if any, as may be stated in the articles of incorporation.

(4) If the articles of incorporation are to be amended in connection with the reverse split, whether to change the number of authorized shares of such class or series or the par value, if any, of the shares of such class or series or for any other reason, such amendment shall be effected pursuant to article 110 of this title.

(5) In lieu of issuing fractional shares upon such reverse split , the corporation may take any of the actions provided for in section 7-106-104.

(6) For the reverse split to be effected:

(a) The board of directors shall recommend the reverse split to the holders of shares of the class or series that is to be reverse split and to each other voting group that is entitled, by reason of any provision in the articles of incorporation, to vote on the reverse split, unless the board of directors determines that, because of conflict of interest or other special circumstances, it should make no recommendation and communicates the basis for its determination to the shareholders with the submission of the reverse split; and

(b) The holders of shares of the class or series that is to be reverse split , and each other voting group that is entitled, by reason of any provision in the articles of incorporation, to vote on the reverse split , shall approve the reverse split .

(7) The board of directors may condition the effectiveness of the reverse split on any basis.

(8) The corporation shall give notice, in accordance with section 7-107-105, to each shareholder entitled to vote on the reverse split , of the shareholders' meeting at which the reverse split will be voted upon. The notice of the meeting shall state that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is to consider the reverse split , and the notice shall contain or be accompanied by a copy or a summary of the reverse split .

(9) Unless articles 101 to 117 of this title, the articles of incorporation, bylaws adopted by the shareholders, or the proposing board of directors require a greater vote, the reverse split shall be approved by the votes required by sections 7-107-206 and 7-107-207 by every voting group entitled to vote on the reverse split.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com





From: Donnell Vigil [mailto:donnell_vigil@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 11:47 AM
To: Craig Huffman ; ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; Donnell_Vigil@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: QASP Reverse

Craig:

Please find attached a copy of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation that Quasar is filing today with the Colorado Secretary of State. This amendment incorporates the following language which conforms with Quasar's corporate Bylaws.

"Except as may otherwise be provided by the Colorado Business Corporation Act, any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders may be taken without a meeting if, before or after the action, a written consent thereto is signed by stockholders holding at least a majority of the voting power; provided that if a different proportion of voting power is required for such an action at a meeting, then that proportion of written consents is required. In no instance where action is authorized by written consent need a meeting of stockholders be called or noticed." Article I, p. 1

Quasar's Bylaws were published to the public on May 19, 2009 (see www.otcmarkets.com/stock/QASP/financials). The foregoing language was omitted in error in our previous filing and in order to conform to our Bylaws we will amended our articles to comply.

In accordance with Quasar's Bylaws and our newly Amended Articles of Incorporation, Quasar should have the right to conduct a reverse split with a written consent thereto signed by stockholders with majority of the voting power without needing a meeting.

Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,

Donnell J. Vigil
Corporate Secretary & Director
Quasar Aerospace Industries, Inc.
9300 Normandy Blvd., Suite 502
Jacksonville, FL 32221
(904) 589-1894 - cell
(904) 378-3259 - office



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 9:07 PM
To: 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Reverse

Joe and Donnell,

This is proving complicated, however you got over the shareholder approval hurdle. Can someone send me the resolution for the reverse. I seem to have everything else but that. It was not on file with Colorado that I saw.

Minor detail ... Please send so I can finish this by tomorrow.

Joe, you and I need to talk tomorrow about this please.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 9:20 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Reverse

Ok will call...donnell pls forward the resolution

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259




From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:03 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '; 'Donnell Vigil'
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: QASP Opinion

Joe and Donnell,

Attached is the opinion for the reverse division for Computershare. Joe , I would still like to talk to you. I tried your office today but didnt get through. Too many choices were Canouses that were not you on the phone menu.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:05 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Opinion

Sorry I will figure out my direct number
The extension is 222
The cell is 404-444-7855
I will call you in the morning unless you have a better time to suggest

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 7:13 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: Invoice for QASP Opinion

Jose,

Attached is the invoice for the reverse division opinion for the Quasar corporate action for Computershare. The amount of the initial quote was really small compared to all that went into this and the extensive litigation. Normally this type of fee would be $3k plus given all at hand. I only increased the quote by $500. Let me know what else is needed. Anything for Pinksheets I will have my associate do it quickly.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 2:31 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Ken Tomchin '; tomfavata03=40aol.com@pi8ip6be6-3cf5icqf.r-v5.readnotify.com; tomchin@tomchinandodom.com
Subject: RE: Invoice for QASP Opinion

CRAIG PLEASE CALL ME ON MY MOBILE PHONE AS AN INDIVIDUAL ATTACHED, MR. TOM FARTVALTA, IS MAKING CLAIMS THAT HE AND A GENTLEMAN NAMED MARREK OZGOODWA HAVE ENGAGED YOU TO SUE ME.

AS YOU KNOW YOU AND I HAVE SPOKEN ABOUT A SIMILAR SUIT ON MY BEHALF AS WELL AS MR. JAMES OWENS AND YOU HAVE BEEN ENGAGED BY QUASAR AS WELL WHICH I AM THE CEO OF

PLEASE CALL TO DISCUSS AT 404-444-7855

BEST REGARDS,

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 7:15 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Ken Tomchin '; tomfavata03=40aol.com@pi8ip6be6-3cf5icqf.r-v5.readnotify.com; tomchin@tomchinandodom.com; ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: Invoice for QASP Opinion

Joe,

For the record I have not been retained, nor my firm for any such lawsuit. That is incorrect and such representations should not be made by any party.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com

Yes, but, there is no doubt that it is made as a hatchet job, and not as "DD".

Czarnik served an essential role in these illegal offerings. He churned out bogus opinion letters predicated on the Promoters' alleged representations to him that they are buy-and hold investors. In fact, Czarnik knew that they had no intention of holding the stock, but that they intended to nationally advertise the stock and quickly dump their shares into the public market for millions of dollars. Czarnik knew or was severely reckless in not knowing that the Promoters intended to distribute the stock to the public and that the transfer agent would rely on his letters and issue stock certificates without restrictive legends.

From:
Mike Kendrick <MKendrick@mineseeker.com>
Add to Contacts
To: xxx xxx<xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx>
Hi xxx, please forgive me for not fully replying but rather attaching a copy of a not to two other QASP shareholders. I hope this is OK . If you have any further question, feel free to ask.



Disclaimer - June 27, 2011
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for xxx. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might not represent those of . Warning: Although has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.
From: Mike Kendrick
Sent: 27 June 2011 17:28
To: 'xxx'
Cc: 'xxx'
Subject: Update

Hi xxx, I have given some thought to your predicament and felt it about time you had an explanation. I have also copied this to xxx, given his email to me of today.
Regards,

Dear xxx,

Thank you for the reply. I do understand your position and I have tried to help and accommodate the QASP shareholders.
Let me explain how.
Firstly, you must understand that we were let down very badly by QASP. They stopped the agreed funding, suddenly and without notice, at a critical time in our programme. This caused enormous damage to our progress – right in the middle of our Croatia demonstration.
On top of that disappointment, some of the QASP shareholders were making libellous claims against us on a public forum. Others were contacting the Croatian authorities to check on our bonifides and not believing we were even in Croatia. One contacted the company of our partner, who passed away suddenly on the basis that we may have made up that story. Incredibly distasteful and unprofessional.
So, at that point, I think you will understand why we wanted nothing to do with QASP. We were being slandered and QASP had reneged on the deal. The contract states quite clearly that the payments were non returnable options.
It then became apparent that Joe Canouse may sue Mineseeker for the $1.7 million that QASP had paid to Mineseeker. In fairness to Joe, he told us he had not seen the agreements and knew of no non-returnable options. We sent Joe copies of the documents two weeks ago and on the 17th of June he acknowledged that he had not seen them before and that they ‘ shed light on your perspective’. Joe's claims were further complicated by Dean Bradley who has written to the Mineseeker stating that much of the cash advanced, came from him personally, not from QASP. The stated that the QASP books did not show any money due from Mineseeker and that we owned him the money. The statement that no debt by Mineseeker was in the books came at a time when Dean was, undisputedly ( I think) the president of QASP.

However, Jeff DiGenova, argued long and hard for the QASP shareholders, stating that many had lost money – some their life savings- and some had only invested as they believed in Mineseeker. This persuaded me that we should take another look at this situation and I offered QASP 4% of common stock in our public entity.
The sequence of events was as follows;
We received several offers to merge with Trophy, from Dean Bradley who explained that he and Joe Canuse owned the company (Trophy) and they would like to work with us.
We met Joe Canuse, Dean Bradley and Donna Virgil during our most recent visit to Jacksonville. I agreed to this meeting on the basis that QASP would not be discussed. We were only listening to an offer from Trophy. We took the details of this offer to our legal counsel who, like ourselves, questioned the legality and ethics of the proposed arrangement. Joe wrote to us formally with this offer which we rejected. We were surprised that these confidential conversations and proposed agreements were emailed to other parties. The details of that breach are being held for future action, if and when necessary.
We made an in good faith offer to QASP, via Joe on the above described 4% of common stock. I assume Joe put this to the QASP shareholders. He did not reply to us formally, although he informed by telephone that it was of no interest. We wrote back to him informing him that the offer was open until 21st of June. We received no response and the offer lapsed.

It seems to me that a section of QASP shareholders are determined, at all cost, to spoil any attempt by NHSH to make a deal with Mineseeker, although, the arrangement would obviously be to the advantage of most . Now, an attack on Dan DiGenova, a young man making his way in life, is subjected to vicious rumours and attacks on his personal integrity. I can tell you that we consider Dan to be a fine young man and our DD would have quickly picked up any questionable behaviour on his part. We have received the shareholders registry related documents and will have warrants to support them. The accusation is obviously false and is simply designed to cause damage to the main body of QASP shareholders, while benefiting one or two.
As far as the accusations against Mineseeker and me personally, we are in the process of subpoenaing a website, Investors Hub, to identify the perpetrators of many false and malicious statements.
I am not in the habit of writing long diatribes but felt this story should be set on record.

Please feel free to post this anywhere you wish. I would be happy to respond to any sensible questions.




Mike Kendrick
Founder.

The Mineseeker Foundation.
The Control Tower. Wolverhampton Business Airport.
Bobbington. Stourbridge. DY7 5DY
T. 01384 904020.
M. 07802 395969
www.mineseeker.org. www.mineseeker.com. www.thesoleofarica.za.org


www.thesoleofarica.za.org

From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 9:41 AM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Cc: 'Donnell Vigil'
Subject: Legal Opinion

Dear Craig

Thank you for agreeing to write the legal opinion required from Computershare. I have copied Donnell Vigil who is our corporate secretary and will be sending you everything you need.
If you can do it by Monday that would be great.

best regards,

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259




From: Craig Huffman <craig@dslgpa.com>
To: ' Joe Canouse ' <joe@thinkpinkllc.com>
Cc: 'Donnell Vigil' <donnell_vigil@yahoo.com>; ' Craig A. Huffman ' <Craig@securuslawgroup.com>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 8:01 PM
Subject: QASP Reverse
Joe,

I saw when I received the paperwork that QASP is a Colorado Company. As such you fall under Colorado Business Corporation Act. Specifically, to effect a reverse stock division it is governed by Section 7-106-105. Under that section, which I have copied below, you must obtain shareholder approval, with notice to all common stock class members, and approval from a shareholder meeting.

I reviewed the QASR Articles of Incorporation, including the latest changes, and there is nothing that allows this to be done without shareholder approval. I am sorry, but I don't see how this is done, unless you have a shareholder meeting/vote first. Let me know what you want to do.

7-106-105. Reverse stock split. (1) Unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, the outstanding shares of a class or series may be reduced to a lesser number of shares by a reverse split made on the terms set forth in this section.

(2) To effect the reverse split , each outstanding share of the class or series shall be divided by the same divisor as is every other such share.

(3) Each share of the class or series shall have, after the reverse split , such par value, if any, as may be stated in the articles of incorporation.

(4) If the articles of incorporation are to be amended in connection with the reverse split, whether to change the number of authorized shares of such class or series or the par value, if any, of the shares of such class or series or for any other reason, such amendment shall be effected pursuant to article 110 of this title.

(5) In lieu of issuing fractional shares upon such reverse split , the corporation may take any of the actions provided for in section 7-106-104.

(6) For the reverse split to be effected:

(a) The board of directors shall recommend the reverse split to the holders of shares of the class or series that is to be reverse split and to each other voting group that is entitled, by reason of any provision in the articles of incorporation, to vote on the reverse split, unless the board of directors determines that, because of conflict of interest or other special circumstances, it should make no recommendation and communicates the basis for its determination to the shareholders with the submission of the reverse split; and

(b) The holders of shares of the class or series that is to be reverse split , and each other voting group that is entitled, by reason of any provision in the articles of incorporation, to vote on the reverse split , shall approve the reverse split .

(7) The board of directors may condition the effectiveness of the reverse split on any basis.

(8) The corporation shall give notice, in accordance with section 7-107-105, to each shareholder entitled to vote on the reverse split , of the shareholders' meeting at which the reverse split will be voted upon. The notice of the meeting shall state that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is to consider the reverse split , and the notice shall contain or be accompanied by a copy or a summary of the reverse split .

(9) Unless articles 101 to 117 of this title, the articles of incorporation, bylaws adopted by the shareholders, or the proposing board of directors require a greater vote, the reverse split shall be approved by the votes required by sections 7-107-206 and 7-107-207 by every voting group entitled to vote on the reverse split.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com





From: Donnell Vigil [mailto:donnell_vigil@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 11:47 AM
To: Craig Huffman ; ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; Donnell_Vigil@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: QASP Reverse

Craig:

Please find attached a copy of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation that Quasar is filing today with the Colorado Secretary of State. This amendment incorporates the following language which conforms with Quasar's corporate Bylaws.

"Except as may otherwise be provided by the Colorado Business Corporation Act, any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders may be taken without a meeting if, before or after the action, a written consent thereto is signed by stockholders holding at least a majority of the voting power; provided that if a different proportion of voting power is required for such an action at a meeting, then that proportion of written consents is required. In no instance where action is authorized by written consent need a meeting of stockholders be called or noticed." Article I, p. 1

Quasar's Bylaws were published to the public on May 19, 2009 (see www.otcmarkets.com/stock/QASP/financials). The foregoing language was omitted in error in our previous filing and in order to conform to our Bylaws we will amended our articles to comply.

In accordance with Quasar's Bylaws and our newly Amended Articles of Incorporation, Quasar should have the right to conduct a reverse split with a written consent thereto signed by stockholders with majority of the voting power without needing a meeting.

Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,

Donnell J. Vigil
Corporate Secretary & Director
Quasar Aerospace Industries, Inc.
9300 Normandy Blvd., Suite 502
Jacksonville, FL 32221
(904) 589-1894 - cell
(904) 378-3259 - office



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 9:07 PM
To: 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Reverse

Joe and Donnell,

This is proving complicated, however you got over the shareholder approval hurdle. Can someone send me the resolution for the reverse. I seem to have everything else but that. It was not on file with Colorado that I saw.

Minor detail ... Please send so I can finish this by tomorrow.

Joe, you and I need to talk tomorrow about this please.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 9:20 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Reverse

Ok will call...donnell pls forward the resolution

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259




From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:03 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '; 'Donnell Vigil'
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: QASP Opinion

Joe and Donnell,

Attached is the opinion for the reverse division for Computershare. Joe , I would still like to talk to you. I tried your office today but didnt get through. Too many choices were Canouses that were not you on the phone menu.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:05 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Opinion

Sorry I will figure out my direct number
The extension is 222
The cell is 404-444-7855
I will call you in the morning unless you have a better time to suggest

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 7:13 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: Invoice for QASP Opinion

Jose,

Attached is the invoice for the reverse division opinion for the Quasar corporate action for Computershare. The amount of the initial quote was really small compared to all that went into this and the extensive litigation. Normally this type of fee would be $3k plus given all at hand. I only increased the quote by $500. Let me know what else is needed. Anything for Pinksheets I will have my associate do it quickly.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 2:31 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Ken Tomchin '; tomfavata03=40aol.com@pi8ip6be6-3cf5icqf.r-v5.readnotify.com; tomchin@tomchinandodom.com
Subject: RE: Invoice for QASP Opinion

CRAIG PLEASE CALL ME ON MY MOBILE PHONE AS AN INDIVIDUAL ATTACHED, MR. TOM FARTVALTA, IS MAKING CLAIMS THAT HE AND A GENTLEMAN NAMED MARREK OZGOODWA HAVE ENGAGED YOU TO SUE ME.

AS YOU KNOW YOU AND I HAVE SPOKEN ABOUT A SIMILAR SUIT ON MY BEHALF AS WELL AS MR. JAMES OWENS AND YOU HAVE BEEN ENGAGED BY QUASAR AS WELL WHICH I AM THE CEO OF

PLEASE CALL TO DISCUSS AT 404-444-7855

BEST REGARDS,

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 7:15 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Ken Tomchin '; tomfavata03=40aol.com@pi8ip6be6-3cf5icqf.r-v5.readnotify.com; tomchin@tomchinandodom.com; ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: Invoice for QASP Opinion

Joe,

For the record I have not been retained, nor my firm for any such lawsuit. That is incorrect and such representations should not be made by any party.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com

Yet there is absolutely no PROOF of such. See here in America if there was wrong doing going on and someone actually turned them in then there would be reproductions, what we have here is distraction and made up stories of wrong doings with no proof of such.

Czarnik served an essential role in these illegal offerings. He churned out bogus opinion letters predicated on the Promoters' alleged representations to him that they are buy-and hold investors. In fact, Czarnik knew that they had no intention of holding the stock, but that they intended to nationally advertise the stock and quickly dump their shares into the public market for millions of dollars. Czarnik knew or was severely reckless in not knowing that the Promoters intended to distribute the stock to the public and that the transfer agent would rely on his letters and issue stock certificates without restrictive legends.

From:
Mike Kendrick <MKendrick@mineseeker.com>
Add to Contacts
To: xxx xxx<xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx>
Hi xxx, please forgive me for not fully replying but rather attaching a copy of a not to two other QASP shareholders. I hope this is OK . If you have any further question, feel free to ask.



Disclaimer - June 27, 2011
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for xxx. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might not represent those of . Warning: Although has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.
From: Mike Kendrick
Sent: 27 June 2011 17:28
To: 'xxx'
Cc: 'xxx'
Subject: Update

Hi xxx, I have given some thought to your predicament and felt it about time you had an explanation. I have also copied this to xxx, given his email to me of today.
Regards,

Dear xxx,

Thank you for the reply. I do understand your position and I have tried to help and accommodate the QASP shareholders.
Let me explain how.
Firstly, you must understand that we were let down very badly by QASP. They stopped the agreed funding, suddenly and without notice, at a critical time in our programme. This caused enormous damage to our progress – right in the middle of our Croatia demonstration.
On top of that disappointment, some of the QASP shareholders were making libellous claims against us on a public forum. Others were contacting the Croatian authorities to check on our bonifides and not believing we were even in Croatia. One contacted the company of our partner, who passed away suddenly on the basis that we may have made up that story. Incredibly distasteful and unprofessional.
So, at that point, I think you will understand why we wanted nothing to do with QASP. We were being slandered and QASP had reneged on the deal. The contract states quite clearly that the payments were non returnable options.
It then became apparent that Joe Canouse may sue Mineseeker for the $1.7 million that QASP had paid to Mineseeker. In fairness to Joe, he told us he had not seen the agreements and knew of no non-returnable options. We sent Joe copies of the documents two weeks ago and on the 17th of June he acknowledged that he had not seen them before and that they ‘ shed light on your perspective’. Joe's claims were further complicated by Dean Bradley who has written to the Mineseeker stating that much of the cash advanced, came from him personally, not from QASP. The stated that the QASP books did not show any money due from Mineseeker and that we owned him the money. The statement that no debt by Mineseeker was in the books came at a time when Dean was, undisputedly ( I think) the president of QASP.

However, Jeff DiGenova, argued long and hard for the QASP shareholders, stating that many had lost money – some their life savings- and some had only invested as they believed in Mineseeker. This persuaded me that we should take another look at this situation and I offered QASP 4% of common stock in our public entity.
The sequence of events was as follows;
We received several offers to merge with Trophy, from Dean Bradley who explained that he and Joe Canuse owned the company (Trophy) and they would like to work with us.
We met Joe Canuse, Dean Bradley and Donna Virgil during our most recent visit to Jacksonville. I agreed to this meeting on the basis that QASP would not be discussed. We were only listening to an offer from Trophy. We took the details of this offer to our legal counsel who, like ourselves, questioned the legality and ethics of the proposed arrangement. Joe wrote to us formally with this offer which we rejected. We were surprised that these confidential conversations and proposed agreements were emailed to other parties. The details of that breach are being held for future action, if and when necessary.
We made an in good faith offer to QASP, via Joe on the above described 4% of common stock. I assume Joe put this to the QASP shareholders. He did not reply to us formally, although he informed by telephone that it was of no interest. We wrote back to him informing him that the offer was open until 21st of June. We received no response and the offer lapsed.

It seems to me that a section of QASP shareholders are determined, at all cost, to spoil any attempt by NHSH to make a deal with Mineseeker, although, the arrangement would obviously be to the advantage of most . Now, an attack on Dan DiGenova, a young man making his way in life, is subjected to vicious rumours and attacks on his personal integrity. I can tell you that we consider Dan to be a fine young man and our DD would have quickly picked up any questionable behaviour on his part. We have received the shareholders registry related documents and will have warrants to support them. The accusation is obviously false and is simply designed to cause damage to the main body of QASP shareholders, while benefiting one or two.
As far as the accusations against Mineseeker and me personally, we are in the process of subpoenaing a website, Investors Hub, to identify the perpetrators of many false and malicious statements.
I am not in the habit of writing long diatribes but felt this story should be set on record.

Please feel free to post this anywhere you wish. I would be happy to respond to any sensible questions.




Mike Kendrick
Founder.

The Mineseeker Foundation.
The Control Tower. Wolverhampton Business Airport.
Bobbington. Stourbridge. DY7 5DY
T. 01384 904020.
M. 07802 395969
www.mineseeker.org. www.mineseeker.com. www.thesoleofarica.za.org


www.thesoleofarica.za.org

From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 9:41 AM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Cc: 'Donnell Vigil'
Subject: Legal Opinion

Dear Craig

Thank you for agreeing to write the legal opinion required from Computershare. I have copied Donnell Vigil who is our corporate secretary and will be sending you everything you need.
If you can do it by Monday that would be great.

best regards,

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259




From: Craig Huffman <craig@dslgpa.com>
To: ' Joe Canouse ' <joe@thinkpinkllc.com>
Cc: 'Donnell Vigil' <donnell_vigil@yahoo.com>; ' Craig A. Huffman ' <Craig@securuslawgroup.com>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 8:01 PM
Subject: QASP Reverse
Joe,

I saw when I received the paperwork that QASP is a Colorado Company. As such you fall under Colorado Business Corporation Act. Specifically, to effect a reverse stock division it is governed by Section 7-106-105. Under that section, which I have copied below, you must obtain shareholder approval, with notice to all common stock class members, and approval from a shareholder meeting.

I reviewed the QASR Articles of Incorporation, including the latest changes, and there is nothing that allows this to be done without shareholder approval. I am sorry, but I don't see how this is done, unless you have a shareholder meeting/vote first. Let me know what you want to do.

7-106-105. Reverse stock split. (1) Unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, the outstanding shares of a class or series may be reduced to a lesser number of shares by a reverse split made on the terms set forth in this section.

(2) To effect the reverse split , each outstanding share of the class or series shall be divided by the same divisor as is every other such share.

(3) Each share of the class or series shall have, after the reverse split , such par value, if any, as may be stated in the articles of incorporation.

(4) If the articles of incorporation are to be amended in connection with the reverse split, whether to change the number of authorized shares of such class or series or the par value, if any, of the shares of such class or series or for any other reason, such amendment shall be effected pursuant to article 110 of this title.

(5) In lieu of issuing fractional shares upon such reverse split , the corporation may take any of the actions provided for in section 7-106-104.

(6) For the reverse split to be effected:

(a) The board of directors shall recommend the reverse split to the holders of shares of the class or series that is to be reverse split and to each other voting group that is entitled, by reason of any provision in the articles of incorporation, to vote on the reverse split, unless the board of directors determines that, because of conflict of interest or other special circumstances, it should make no recommendation and communicates the basis for its determination to the shareholders with the submission of the reverse split; and

(b) The holders of shares of the class or series that is to be reverse split , and each other voting group that is entitled, by reason of any provision in the articles of incorporation, to vote on the reverse split , shall approve the reverse split .

(7) The board of directors may condition the effectiveness of the reverse split on any basis.

(8) The corporation shall give notice, in accordance with section 7-107-105, to each shareholder entitled to vote on the reverse split , of the shareholders' meeting at which the reverse split will be voted upon. The notice of the meeting shall state that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is to consider the reverse split , and the notice shall contain or be accompanied by a copy or a summary of the reverse split .

(9) Unless articles 101 to 117 of this title, the articles of incorporation, bylaws adopted by the shareholders, or the proposing board of directors require a greater vote, the reverse split shall be approved by the votes required by sections 7-107-206 and 7-107-207 by every voting group entitled to vote on the reverse split.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com





From: Donnell Vigil [mailto:donnell_vigil@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 11:47 AM
To: Craig Huffman ; ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; Donnell_Vigil@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: QASP Reverse

Craig:

Please find attached a copy of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation that Quasar is filing today with the Colorado Secretary of State. This amendment incorporates the following language which conforms with Quasar's corporate Bylaws.

"Except as may otherwise be provided by the Colorado Business Corporation Act, any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders may be taken without a meeting if, before or after the action, a written consent thereto is signed by stockholders holding at least a majority of the voting power; provided that if a different proportion of voting power is required for such an action at a meeting, then that proportion of written consents is required. In no instance where action is authorized by written consent need a meeting of stockholders be called or noticed." Article I, p. 1

Quasar's Bylaws were published to the public on May 19, 2009 (see www.otcmarkets.com/stock/QASP/financials). The foregoing language was omitted in error in our previous filing and in order to conform to our Bylaws we will amended our articles to comply.

In accordance with Quasar's Bylaws and our newly Amended Articles of Incorporation, Quasar should have the right to conduct a reverse split with a written consent thereto signed by stockholders with majority of the voting power without needing a meeting.

Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,

Donnell J. Vigil
Corporate Secretary & Director
Quasar Aerospace Industries, Inc.
9300 Normandy Blvd., Suite 502
Jacksonville, FL 32221
(904) 589-1894 - cell
(904) 378-3259 - office



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 9:07 PM
To: 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Reverse

Joe and Donnell,

This is proving complicated, however you got over the shareholder approval hurdle. Can someone send me the resolution for the reverse. I seem to have everything else but that. It was not on file with Colorado that I saw.

Minor detail ... Please send so I can finish this by tomorrow.

Joe, you and I need to talk tomorrow about this please.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 9:20 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Reverse

Ok will call...donnell pls forward the resolution

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259




From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:03 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '; 'Donnell Vigil'
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: QASP Opinion

Joe and Donnell,

Attached is the opinion for the reverse division for Computershare. Joe , I would still like to talk to you. I tried your office today but didnt get through. Too many choices were Canouses that were not you on the phone menu.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:05 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Opinion

Sorry I will figure out my direct number
The extension is 222
The cell is 404-444-7855
I will call you in the morning unless you have a better time to suggest

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 7:13 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: Invoice for QASP Opinion

Jose,

Attached is the invoice for the reverse division opinion for the Quasar corporate action for Computershare. The amount of the initial quote was really small compared to all that went into this and the extensive litigation. Normally this type of fee would be $3k plus given all at hand. I only increased the quote by $500. Let me know what else is needed. Anything for Pinksheets I will have my associate do it quickly.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 2:31 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Ken Tomchin '; tomfavata03=40aol.com@pi8ip6be6-3cf5icqf.r-v5.readnotify.com; tomchin@tomchinandodom.com
Subject: RE: Invoice for QASP Opinion

CRAIG PLEASE CALL ME ON MY MOBILE PHONE AS AN INDIVIDUAL ATTACHED, MR. TOM FARTVALTA, IS MAKING CLAIMS THAT HE AND A GENTLEMAN NAMED MARREK OZGOODWA HAVE ENGAGED YOU TO SUE ME.

AS YOU KNOW YOU AND I HAVE SPOKEN ABOUT A SIMILAR SUIT ON MY BEHALF AS WELL AS MR. JAMES OWENS AND YOU HAVE BEEN ENGAGED BY QUASAR AS WELL WHICH I AM THE CEO OF

PLEASE CALL TO DISCUSS AT 404-444-7855

BEST REGARDS,

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 7:15 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Ken Tomchin '; tomfavata03=40aol.com@pi8ip6be6-3cf5icqf.r-v5.readnotify.com; tomchin@tomchinandodom.com; ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: Invoice for QASP Opinion

Joe,

For the record I have not been retained, nor my firm for any such lawsuit. That is incorrect and such representations should not be made by any party.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com

joe and family doing more than 10 dw's, while working the merger/shell and having a family member working the inside, equals a "great businessman".

And this from a great DD man nodummy...

If the opposing view was to ever post some supporting docs, I might agree with them.

Czarnik served an essential role in these illegal offerings. He churned out bogus opinion letters predicated on the Promoters' alleged representations to him that they are buy-and hold investors. In fact, Czarnik knew that they had no intention of holding the stock, but that they intended to nationally advertise the stock and quickly dump their shares into the public market for millions of dollars. Czarnik knew or was severely reckless in not knowing that the Promoters intended to distribute the stock to the public and that the transfer agent would rely on his letters and issue stock certificates without restrictive legends.

From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 9:41 AM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Cc: 'Donnell Vigil'
Subject: Legal Opinion

Dear Craig

Thank you for agreeing to write the legal opinion required from Computershare. I have copied Donnell Vigil who is our corporate secretary and will be sending you everything you need.
If you can do it by Monday that would be great.

best regards,

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259




From: Craig Huffman <craig@dslgpa.com>
To: ' Joe Canouse ' <joe@thinkpinkllc.com>
Cc: 'Donnell Vigil' <donnell_vigil@yahoo.com>; ' Craig A. Huffman ' <Craig@securuslawgroup.com>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 8:01 PM
Subject: QASP Reverse
Joe,

I saw when I received the paperwork that QASP is a Colorado Company. As such you fall under Colorado Business Corporation Act. Specifically, to effect a reverse stock division it is governed by Section 7-106-105. Under that section, which I have copied below, you must obtain shareholder approval, with notice to all common stock class members, and approval from a shareholder meeting.

I reviewed the QASR Articles of Incorporation, including the latest changes, and there is nothing that allows this to be done without shareholder approval. I am sorry, but I don't see how this is done, unless you have a shareholder meeting/vote first. Let me know what you want to do.

7-106-105. Reverse stock split. (1) Unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, the outstanding shares of a class or series may be reduced to a lesser number of shares by a reverse split made on the terms set forth in this section.

(2) To effect the reverse split , each outstanding share of the class or series shall be divided by the same divisor as is every other such share.

(3) Each share of the class or series shall have, after the reverse split , such par value, if any, as may be stated in the articles of incorporation.

(4) If the articles of incorporation are to be amended in connection with the reverse split, whether to change the number of authorized shares of such class or series or the par value, if any, of the shares of such class or series or for any other reason, such amendment shall be effected pursuant to article 110 of this title.

(5) In lieu of issuing fractional shares upon such reverse split , the corporation may take any of the actions provided for in section 7-106-104.

(6) For the reverse split to be effected:

(a) The board of directors shall recommend the reverse split to the holders of shares of the class or series that is to be reverse split and to each other voting group that is entitled, by reason of any provision in the articles of incorporation, to vote on the reverse split, unless the board of directors determines that, because of conflict of interest or other special circumstances, it should make no recommendation and communicates the basis for its determination to the shareholders with the submission of the reverse split; and

(b) The holders of shares of the class or series that is to be reverse split , and each other voting group that is entitled, by reason of any provision in the articles of incorporation, to vote on the reverse split , shall approve the reverse split .

(7) The board of directors may condition the effectiveness of the reverse split on any basis.

(8) The corporation shall give notice, in accordance with section 7-107-105, to each shareholder entitled to vote on the reverse split , of the shareholders' meeting at which the reverse split will be voted upon. The notice of the meeting shall state that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is to consider the reverse split , and the notice shall contain or be accompanied by a copy or a summary of the reverse split .

(9) Unless articles 101 to 117 of this title, the articles of incorporation, bylaws adopted by the shareholders, or the proposing board of directors require a greater vote, the reverse split shall be approved by the votes required by sections 7-107-206 and 7-107-207 by every voting group entitled to vote on the reverse split.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com





From: Donnell Vigil [mailto:donnell_vigil@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 11:47 AM
To: Craig Huffman ; ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; Donnell_Vigil@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: QASP Reverse

Craig:

Please find attached a copy of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation that Quasar is filing today with the Colorado Secretary of State. This amendment incorporates the following language which conforms with Quasar's corporate Bylaws.

"Except as may otherwise be provided by the Colorado Business Corporation Act, any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders may be taken without a meeting if, before or after the action, a written consent thereto is signed by stockholders holding at least a majority of the voting power; provided that if a different proportion of voting power is required for such an action at a meeting, then that proportion of written consents is required. In no instance where action is authorized by written consent need a meeting of stockholders be called or noticed." Article I, p. 1

Quasar's Bylaws were published to the public on May 19, 2009 (see www.otcmarkets.com/stock/QASP/financials). The foregoing language was omitted in error in our previous filing and in order to conform to our Bylaws we will amended our articles to comply.

In accordance with Quasar's Bylaws and our newly Amended Articles of Incorporation, Quasar should have the right to conduct a reverse split with a written consent thereto signed by stockholders with majority of the voting power without needing a meeting.

Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,

Donnell J. Vigil
Corporate Secretary & Director
Quasar Aerospace Industries, Inc.
9300 Normandy Blvd., Suite 502
Jacksonville, FL 32221
(904) 589-1894 - cell
(904) 378-3259 - office



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 9:07 PM
To: 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Reverse

Joe and Donnell,

This is proving complicated, however you got over the shareholder approval hurdle. Can someone send me the resolution for the reverse. I seem to have everything else but that. It was not on file with Colorado that I saw.

Minor detail ... Please send so I can finish this by tomorrow.

Joe, you and I need to talk tomorrow about this please.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 9:20 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Reverse

Ok will call...donnell pls forward the resolution

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259




From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:03 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '; 'Donnell Vigil'
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: QASP Opinion

Joe and Donnell,

Attached is the opinion for the reverse division for Computershare. Joe , I would still like to talk to you. I tried your office today but didnt get through. Too many choices were Canouses that were not you on the phone menu.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:05 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Opinion

Sorry I will figure out my direct number
The extension is 222
The cell is 404-444-7855
I will call you in the morning unless you have a better time to suggest

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 7:13 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: Invoice for QASP Opinion

Jose,

Attached is the invoice for the reverse division opinion for the Quasar corporate action for Computershare. The amount of the initial quote was really small compared to all that went into this and the extensive litigation. Normally this type of fee would be $3k plus given all at hand. I only increased the quote by $500. Let me know what else is needed. Anything for Pinksheets I will have my associate do it quickly.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 2:31 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Ken Tomchin '; tomfavata03=40aol.com@pi8ip6be6-3cf5icqf.r-v5.readnotify.com; tomchin@tomchinandodom.com
Subject: RE: Invoice for QASP Opinion

CRAIG PLEASE CALL ME ON MY MOBILE PHONE AS AN INDIVIDUAL ATTACHED, MR. TOM FARTVALTA, IS MAKING CLAIMS THAT HE AND A GENTLEMAN NAMED MARREK OZGOODWA HAVE ENGAGED YOU TO SUE ME.

AS YOU KNOW YOU AND I HAVE SPOKEN ABOUT A SIMILAR SUIT ON MY BEHALF AS WELL AS MR. JAMES OWENS AND YOU HAVE BEEN ENGAGED BY QUASAR AS WELL WHICH I AM THE CEO OF

PLEASE CALL TO DISCUSS AT 404-444-7855

BEST REGARDS,

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 7:15 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Ken Tomchin '; tomfavata03=40aol.com@pi8ip6be6-3cf5icqf.r-v5.readnotify.com; tomchin@tomchinandodom.com; ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: Invoice for QASP Opinion

Joe,

For the record I have not been retained, nor my firm for any such lawsuit. That is incorrect and such representations should not be made by any party.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com

Extremely high, instead of learning how to professionally run a public company from Joe, N takes after dean.

From: Donnell Vigil [mailto:donnell_vigil@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 11:47 AM
To: Craig Huffman ; ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; Donnell_Vigil@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: QASP Reverse

Craig:

Please find attached a copy of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation that Quasar is filing today with the Colorado Secretary of State. This amendment incorporates the following language which conforms with Quasar's corporate Bylaws.

"Except as may otherwise be provided by the Colorado Business Corporation Act, any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders may be taken without a meeting if, before or after the action, a written consent thereto is signed by stockholders holding at least a majority of the voting power; provided that if a different proportion of voting power is required for such an action at a meeting, then that proportion of written consents is required. In no instance where action is authorized by written consent need a meeting of stockholders be called or noticed." Article I, p. 1

Quasar's Bylaws were published to the public on May 19, 2009 (see www.otcmarkets.com/stock/QASP/financials). The foregoing language was omitted in error in our previous filing and in order to conform to our Bylaws we will amended our articles to comply.

In accordance with Quasar's Bylaws and our newly Amended Articles of Incorporation, Quasar should have the right to conduct a reverse split with a written consent thereto signed by stockholders with majority of the voting power without needing a meeting.

Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,

Donnell J. Vigil
Corporate Secretary & Director
Quasar Aerospace Industries, Inc.
9300 Normandy Blvd., Suite 502
Jacksonville, FL 32221
(904) 589-1894 - cell
(904) 378-3259 - office



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 9:07 PM
To: 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Reverse

Joe and Donnell,

This is proving complicated, however you got over the shareholder approval hurdle. Can someone send me the resolution for the reverse. I seem to have everything else but that. It was not on file with Colorado that I saw.

Czarnik served an essential role in these illegal offerings. He churned out bogus opinion letters predicated on the Promoters' alleged representations to him that they are buy-and hold investors. In fact, Czarnik knew that they had no intention of holding the stock, but that they intended to nationally advertise the stock and quickly dump their shares into the public market for millions of dollars. Czarnik knew or was severely reckless in not knowing that the Promoters intended to distribute the stock to the public and that the transfer agent would rely on his letters and issue stock certificates without restrictive legends.

From:
Mike Kendrick <MKendrick@mineseeker.com>
Add to Contacts
To: xxx xxx<xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx>
Hi xxx, please forgive me for not fully replying but rather attaching a copy of a not to two other QASP shareholders. I hope this is OK . If you have any further question, feel free to ask.



Disclaimer - June 27, 2011
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for xxx. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and might not represent those of . Warning: Although has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.
From: Mike Kendrick
Sent: 27 June 2011 17:28
To: 'xxx'
Cc: 'xxx'
Subject: Update

Hi xxx, I have given some thought to your predicament and felt it about time you had an explanation. I have also copied this to xxx, given his email to me of today.
Regards,

Dear xxx,

Thank you for the reply. I do understand your position and I have tried to help and accommodate the QASP shareholders.
Let me explain how.
Firstly, you must understand that we were let down very badly by QASP. They stopped the agreed funding, suddenly and without notice, at a critical time in our programme. This caused enormous damage to our progress – right in the middle of our Croatia demonstration.
On top of that disappointment, some of the QASP shareholders were making libellous claims against us on a public forum. Others were contacting the Croatian authorities to check on our bonifides and not believing we were even in Croatia. One contacted the company of our partner, who passed away suddenly on the basis that we may have made up that story. Incredibly distasteful and unprofessional.
So, at that point, I think you will understand why we wanted nothing to do with QASP. We were being slandered and QASP had reneged on the deal. The contract states quite clearly that the payments were non returnable options.
It then became apparent that Joe Canouse may sue Mineseeker for the $1.7 million that QASP had paid to Mineseeker. In fairness to Joe, he told us he had not seen the agreements and knew of no non-returnable options. We sent Joe copies of the documents two weeks ago and on the 17th of June he acknowledged that he had not seen them before and that they ‘ shed light on your perspective’. Joe's claims were further complicated by Dean Bradley who has written to the Mineseeker stating that much of the cash advanced, came from him personally, not from QASP. The stated that the QASP books did not show any money due from Mineseeker and that we owned him the money. The statement that no debt by Mineseeker was in the books came at a time when Dean was, undisputedly ( I think) the president of QASP.

However, Jeff DiGenova, argued long and hard for the QASP shareholders, stating that many had lost money – some their life savings- and some had only invested as they believed in Mineseeker. This persuaded me that we should take another look at this situation and I offered QASP 4% of common stock in our public entity.
The sequence of events was as follows;
We received several offers to merge with Trophy, from Dean Bradley who explained that he and Joe Canuse owned the company (Trophy) and they would like to work with us.
We met Joe Canuse, Dean Bradley and Donna Virgil during our most recent visit to Jacksonville. I agreed to this meeting on the basis that QASP would not be discussed. We were only listening to an offer from Trophy. We took the details of this offer to our legal counsel who, like ourselves, questioned the legality and ethics of the proposed arrangement. Joe wrote to us formally with this offer which we rejected. We were surprised that these confidential conversations and proposed agreements were emailed to other parties. The details of that breach are being held for future action, if and when necessary.
We made an in good faith offer to QASP, via Joe on the above described 4% of common stock. I assume Joe put this to the QASP shareholders. He did not reply to us formally, although he informed by telephone that it was of no interest. We wrote back to him informing him that the offer was open until 21st of June. We received no response and the offer lapsed.

It seems to me that a section of QASP shareholders are determined, at all cost, to spoil any attempt by NHSH to make a deal with Mineseeker, although, the arrangement would obviously be to the advantage of most . Now, an attack on Dan DiGenova, a young man making his way in life, is subjected to vicious rumours and attacks on his personal integrity. I can tell you that we consider Dan to be a fine young man and our DD would have quickly picked up any questionable behaviour on his part. We have received the shareholders registry related documents and will have warrants to support them. The accusation is obviously false and is simply designed to cause damage to the main body of QASP shareholders, while benefiting one or two.
As far as the accusations against Mineseeker and me personally, we are in the process of subpoenaing a website, Investors Hub, to identify the perpetrators of many false and malicious statements.
I am not in the habit of writing long diatribes but felt this story should be set on record.

Please feel free to post this anywhere you wish. I would be happy to respond to any sensible questions.




Mike Kendrick
Founder.

The Mineseeker Foundation.
The Control Tower. Wolverhampton Business Airport.
Bobbington. Stourbridge. DY7 5DY
T. 01384 904020.
M. 07802 395969
www.mineseeker.org. www.mineseeker.com. www.thesoleofarica.za.org


www.thesoleofarica.za.org

From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 9:41 AM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Cc: 'Donnell Vigil'
Subject: Legal Opinion

Dear Craig

Thank you for agreeing to write the legal opinion required from Computershare. I have copied Donnell Vigil who is our corporate secretary and will be sending you everything you need.
If you can do it by Monday that would be great.

best regards,

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259




From: Craig Huffman <craig@dslgpa.com>
To: ' Joe Canouse ' <joe@thinkpinkllc.com>
Cc: 'Donnell Vigil' <donnell_vigil@yahoo.com>; ' Craig A. Huffman ' <Craig@securuslawgroup.com>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 8:01 PM
Subject: QASP Reverse
Joe,

I saw when I received the paperwork that QASP is a Colorado Company. As such you fall under Colorado Business Corporation Act. Specifically, to effect a reverse stock division it is governed by Section 7-106-105. Under that section, which I have copied below, you must obtain shareholder approval, with notice to all common stock class members, and approval from a shareholder meeting.

I reviewed the QASR Articles of Incorporation, including the latest changes, and there is nothing that allows this to be done without shareholder approval. I am sorry, but I don't see how this is done, unless you have a shareholder meeting/vote first. Let me know what you want to do.

7-106-105. Reverse stock split. (1) Unless otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, the outstanding shares of a class or series may be reduced to a lesser number of shares by a reverse split made on the terms set forth in this section.

(2) To effect the reverse split , each outstanding share of the class or series shall be divided by the same divisor as is every other such share.

(3) Each share of the class or series shall have, after the reverse split , such par value, if any, as may be stated in the articles of incorporation.

(4) If the articles of incorporation are to be amended in connection with the reverse split, whether to change the number of authorized shares of such class or series or the par value, if any, of the shares of such class or series or for any other reason, such amendment shall be effected pursuant to article 110 of this title.

(5) In lieu of issuing fractional shares upon such reverse split , the corporation may take any of the actions provided for in section 7-106-104.

(6) For the reverse split to be effected:

(a) The board of directors shall recommend the reverse split to the holders of shares of the class or series that is to be reverse split and to each other voting group that is entitled, by reason of any provision in the articles of incorporation, to vote on the reverse split, unless the board of directors determines that, because of conflict of interest or other special circumstances, it should make no recommendation and communicates the basis for its determination to the shareholders with the submission of the reverse split; and

(b) The holders of shares of the class or series that is to be reverse split , and each other voting group that is entitled, by reason of any provision in the articles of incorporation, to vote on the reverse split , shall approve the reverse split .

(7) The board of directors may condition the effectiveness of the reverse split on any basis.

(8) The corporation shall give notice, in accordance with section 7-107-105, to each shareholder entitled to vote on the reverse split , of the shareholders' meeting at which the reverse split will be voted upon. The notice of the meeting shall state that the purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is to consider the reverse split , and the notice shall contain or be accompanied by a copy or a summary of the reverse split .

(9) Unless articles 101 to 117 of this title, the articles of incorporation, bylaws adopted by the shareholders, or the proposing board of directors require a greater vote, the reverse split shall be approved by the votes required by sections 7-107-206 and 7-107-207 by every voting group entitled to vote on the reverse split.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com





From: Donnell Vigil [mailto:donnell_vigil@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 11:47 AM
To: Craig Huffman ; ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; Donnell_Vigil@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: QASP Reverse

Craig:

Please find attached a copy of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation that Quasar is filing today with the Colorado Secretary of State. This amendment incorporates the following language which conforms with Quasar's corporate Bylaws.

"Except as may otherwise be provided by the Colorado Business Corporation Act, any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the stockholders may be taken without a meeting if, before or after the action, a written consent thereto is signed by stockholders holding at least a majority of the voting power; provided that if a different proportion of voting power is required for such an action at a meeting, then that proportion of written consents is required. In no instance where action is authorized by written consent need a meeting of stockholders be called or noticed." Article I, p. 1

Quasar's Bylaws were published to the public on May 19, 2009 (see www.otcmarkets.com/stock/QASP/financials). The foregoing language was omitted in error in our previous filing and in order to conform to our Bylaws we will amended our articles to comply.

In accordance with Quasar's Bylaws and our newly Amended Articles of Incorporation, Quasar should have the right to conduct a reverse split with a written consent thereto signed by stockholders with majority of the voting power without needing a meeting.

Please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks,

Donnell J. Vigil
Corporate Secretary & Director
Quasar Aerospace Industries, Inc.
9300 Normandy Blvd., Suite 502
Jacksonville, FL 32221
(904) 589-1894 - cell
(904) 378-3259 - office



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 9:07 PM
To: 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Reverse

Joe and Donnell,

This is proving complicated, however you got over the shareholder approval hurdle. Can someone send me the resolution for the reverse. I seem to have everything else but that. It was not on file with Colorado that I saw.

Minor detail ... Please send so I can finish this by tomorrow.

Joe, you and I need to talk tomorrow about this please.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 9:20 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Reverse

Ok will call...donnell pls forward the resolution

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259




From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:03 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '; 'Donnell Vigil'
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: QASP Opinion

Joe and Donnell,

Attached is the opinion for the reverse division for Computershare. Joe , I would still like to talk to you. I tried your office today but didnt get through. Too many choices were Canouses that were not you on the phone menu.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 9:05 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Subject: RE: QASP Opinion

Sorry I will figure out my direct number
The extension is 222
The cell is 404-444-7855
I will call you in the morning unless you have a better time to suggest

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 23, 2011 7:13 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: Invoice for QASP Opinion

Jose,

Attached is the invoice for the reverse division opinion for the Quasar corporate action for Computershare. The amount of the initial quote was really small compared to all that went into this and the extensive litigation. Normally this type of fee would be $3k plus given all at hand. I only increased the quote by $500. Let me know what else is needed. Anything for Pinksheets I will have my associate do it quickly.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com




From: Joe Canouse [mailto:joe@thinkpinkllc.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 2:31 PM
To: ' Craig Huffman '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Ken Tomchin '; tomfavata03=40aol.com@pi8ip6be6-3cf5icqf.r-v5.readnotify.com; tomchin@tomchinandodom.com
Subject: RE: Invoice for QASP Opinion

CRAIG PLEASE CALL ME ON MY MOBILE PHONE AS AN INDIVIDUAL ATTACHED, MR. TOM FARTVALTA, IS MAKING CLAIMS THAT HE AND A GENTLEMAN NAMED MARREK OZGOODWA HAVE ENGAGED YOU TO SUE ME.

AS YOU KNOW YOU AND I HAVE SPOKEN ABOUT A SIMILAR SUIT ON MY BEHALF AS WELL AS MR. JAMES OWENS AND YOU HAVE BEEN ENGAGED BY QUASAR AS WELL WHICH I AM THE CEO OF

PLEASE CALL TO DISCUSS AT 404-444-7855

BEST REGARDS,

Joseph C. Canouse
joe@thinkpinkllc.com

P: 866-770-0006
P2: 770-521-1330
F: 770-521-0259



From: Craig Huffman [mailto:craig@dslgpa.com]
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 7:15 PM
To: ' Joe Canouse '
Cc: ' Craig A. Huffman '; 'Donnell Vigil'; ' Ken Tomchin '; tomfavata03=40aol.com@pi8ip6be6-3cf5icqf.r-v5.readnotify.com; tomchin@tomchinandodom.com; ' Craig A. Huffman '
Subject: RE: Invoice for QASP Opinion

Joe,

For the record I have not been retained, nor my firm for any such lawsuit. That is incorrect and such representations should not be made by any party.


Craig A. Huffman
Securus Law Group, P.A.
13046 Racetrack Road #243
Tampa, Florida 33626
Phone: (888) 914-4144
Fax: (888) 783-4712
e-mail: craig@securuslawgroup.com

the attorney said they couldn't do the R/S but joe adjusted the AoI so they could.

again i think you are asking the wrong question and in this case the wrong document

who in your opinion requires a legal opinion for a reverse split

why would a poster here have that legal opinion if not me or another rep of quasar

16. Cameron H. Linton, Esq., age 57, resides in Winter Park, Florida. He is an
attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Florida. From approximately 2009 to the present,
Linton's law practice has included writing opinion letters for clients involving transactions under
the federal securities laws. Between February 2009 and March 2011, Linton wrote
approximately 75 to 100 opinion letters on wrap around transactions for a number of clients,
including on behalf of Protege and Capital Edge.

They were intimately involved with formation and operation of QASP.

Question, I see the names dan, todd and czarnik in the April 27, 2009 e-mail from Scott M to Dean B.
Is it known who these people are and their roll in this orchestrated web of deceit ?

V.
Enter an Order barring Czarnik from participating in any offering of penny stock pursuant to Section 20(g) of the Securities Act and Section 21 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 77t(g) and 78u(d)(6»).

VI.
Enter an Order prohibiting Czarnik from providing legal services to any person in connection with the offer or sale of securities pursuant to, or claiming, an exemption under Regulation D, including without limitation, participating in the preparation or issuance of any opinion letter related to such offerings.

doughboy2 Member Profile doughboy2 Member Level

Share
Monday, June 11, 2012 10:41:14 AM
Re: dehydratedman post# 257951
Post # of 258883
Thank you, GeneO.

It's nice to see truthful posts that contain factual information.

Perhaps you can help in researching another key player here - scott martin.

This guy is obviously in this deep - he has been a player since the beginning and is right there now.

Look forward to seeing what you can dredge up.

well isnt it amazing how a little old poster like you has corporate records that even now Quasar does not

i made money; i did
alot, yes probably by most people standards

3-fixing the corporate structure which we have made imo the first most important step