Your link shows a billion shorts.

O/S is only 850Mish.

Where is the squeeze?

Any volume should start it with those ratios.

What you're seeing, IMO, is new shares entering the street.

Dilution doesn't just magically appear - it is sold into the marketplace over time.

Those dilutive shares show up as "shorts".

Useful tool to figure out the O/S of a gagged company - which QASP is.

That's fine but why hasn't there been a squeeze with all those "shorts" in that link of yours?

If those daily shorts are real shorts, why is there never a squeeze?

Because, new shares entering the market are factored in as daily shorts.

The only short count that matters is the monthly #'s.

Do you know how difficult and expensive it is to short 1 share of qasp?

I've been reading, for a month now, that shorting is happening in qasp.

It isn't. The risk v reward is not there. Too costly to short this.

There are no shorts in qasp.

There will be no short squeeze.

There will be an increase in the O/S.

Surprising as vigil recently PR'd they were getting current but instead, it falls from yield to stop.

What's next on the ladder? Skull and crossbones.

Wow. Stop sign on qasp now.

Beware "investors".

Those #'s are over 3 months old.

IMO, you can probably add at least another billion.

There is no way QASP has a $100m revolving line of credit with PNC Bank.

Exactly - those fins are nonexistent so they cannot be shown.

Thanks for the confirmation.

Please show fins where any of this fluff has produced positive revs for the company.

All fluff.

No value.

Can you post all the PR's that never came to pass as well?

Hope everyone that got all those .0002's and .0001's sold at .0038.

Great trade for those folks.

Hope not a lot are stuck at .0027 averages.

Please show where any PR'd business plan ever came to pass - except the reverse split PR cause that happened.

OK but wouldn't SEVIS be in jeapordy if they started muling pot with their planes?

What's wrong with UPS or FedEx?

Sounds like that broker is blowing smoke.

The big boards have no correlation with the stink pinks at all.

Today's Q action is simply traders trading as they want to.

Today's news was more fluff.

LOI's do nothing.

I wonder why the TA is gagged,

Why would a company gag a TA?

Yes RICO - and some more: Even if banks are willing, they face significant risk if they offer banking services to marijuana-related businesses. The federal statutory barriers include the Controlled Substance Act, USA Patriot Act, Bank Secrecy Act, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act

http://www.ababj.com/blogs-3/community-banking-blog/item/4381-the-cannabis-conundrum

While things may change and not doubting that investors are lining up, what is wrong about my post right now?

Then why do banks have a hands off approach with MJ Co's?

Because, they could be charged with conspiracy under RICO.

Personally, I am pro-MJ and hope the feds remove it from Schedule I of the CSA.

But until then, all cash business with no account ting for a pubco......

Love the Jimi pic.

IMO, that was an April Fools Day prank.

A rather good one I thought.

Yes, my point that federal banking laws makes it prohibitive for banks to work with MJCo's in a normal way is bolstered by that article.

Are you implying that qasp management plans to wash this MJ money through other companies first?

Thanks again for sharing.

I had read that - good article.

Clearly states how vexing it is for a small private company to deal with all cash - to this degree, "To try to keep the banks from catching on, he said, he even sprays his cash with Febreze to disguise the scent of marijuana."

Banks are very skittish about dealing with MJ Co's.

" Without specific guidelines, many banks might continue to refuse transactions with legal marijuana businesses.

Richard Riese, senior vice president for regulatory compliance at the American Bankers Association, said this month that banks would want to know, for instance, that they were not “aiding and abetting” a criminal enterprise if they provided such services.

“Banks will need a lot of detail from regulators to get the satisfaction and comfort they are looking for,” he said."

How will a pubco persuade the shareholder, true or potential, that their books are clean?

Thanks for posting that - it really supports my post.

How is converting to gold a solution for a pubco?

Need detailed accounting for a legit pubco.

All cash and no bank records would leave lots of doubt in the marketplace.

That's a good point.

Federal banking laws prohibit CO MJ co's from using banks due to RICO regulations.

How would Q, as a pubco, finalize accurate accounting for public consumption?

My concern is that qasp publically admitted in a PR that the original CEO committed potential fraud.

They have never cleaned up their accounting.

Every quarter for the last few years, they file that they have requested bank records. How long does that take in our computerized world?

With those facts, what company, that does a smidgen of DD on Q, will want to be brought into its folds?

Too much potential liability with Q, IMO.

There are plenty of clean, cheap shells out there to work with.

You can read about it in qasp's own PR:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=au2AhsVOqVuI

How is it undervalued?

The fins show it in the red.

History of dilution and a gagged TA.

Flying to CO to meet with contacts is as vague as it gets.

Bank records from deans alleged fraud period have been requested for the last 3 years. How long does that take?

How can an accurate value be found on this?

Not to those that are red right now.

Those SH's care if there is solution or if the vague "I know people in CO" really results in profit down the line.

Because, as all that follow this POS knows, qasp has never made positive revs on their actual business model.

What are the requirements to short a .003 stock?

In Q's case, there has never been a short squeeze.

Those daily short numbers have always been new shares entering the market.

The TA is gagged - the OS increased from 300mish to 800mish in 3 months.

Last known #'s are from 12/31/13.

Inside PP's were recently filed with CO SoS.

Some estimate they convert to 1 billion new shares.

Will the OS grow substantially once March's numbers are made public in 2 to 3 months?

There are no shorts in qasp.

The requirements to short down here are absurd.

Usually, in the pinks, daily shorts are actually new shares entering the market.

Doubtful. Lots of dilution is probably occurring in qasp, IMO.

TA is gagged by q management for a reason.

Rumor has it, vigil is in CO selling off assets from a failed aviation school.

Could that be A-Cent?

Fwiw, you can block just PM's.

Go to any board and look for a red "Filter Enabled" button (to the right just above wbere the messages start appearing - just above "Newer"). Click it and it will change to green and read "Filter Disabled".

BTW, talking to him is like talking to a wall. A very dumb wall.

They rent those banner spaces to Google and the like.

The data is being mined from all of your actions on your computer not just ihub

What does "awesome MJ connections" mean?

How so?

Links, please.

Half the people I know have awesome MJ connections and none of them live in CO.

Well, fwiw, I don't think that will happen either (nhsh/mj move).

That would reward those holding N shares and that would go against the grain.

As to MS and GDSM connection to vigil/qasp, I have no clue - just passing on different pieces trying to form the puzzle.

A-Cent was very quiet in those pictures and I have called several times over the last few months and a human has never answered the phone.

The thought that A-Cent was going to be liquidated wouldn't surprise me - wasn't it only worth $100k or so when q got it?

IMO, Q wanted the Part 141 A-Cent offered them - never merged websites or gave any free hotdogs away in Co Springs.

CO A-Cent itself always felt like an afterthought.

Yup - read that hint.

Why let the cat out if they were gonna do that?

Why hint - why not surprise?

But, "it makes sense" - perhaps that is why it was posted - gets the mind moving.

Still have huge doubts any legitimate venture would want to come near qasp or nhsh.

Plenty of other clean shells out there without the history these two have.

What's new about this news?

Wasn't she was supposed to be in CO already.

The only thing new about this is it shows how wired into ihub she is - responding to rumors.

Will tomorrow's PR read, "Quasar Aerospace Industries, Inc.'s is excited to announce that its President, Donnell J. Vigil is storing her carry-on in the overhead bin on a flight that will be heading (to!) Colorado to conduct Quasar business. Mrs. Vigil has scheduled meetings with several friends that smoke pot. Mrs. Vigil shall update the shareholders and investment community upon landing."?

Knowing people in your home state and inking some sort of MJ deal are eons apart.

Especially when QASP has a history of "potential actions of fraud", by dean bradley, as PR'd, by QASP itself: http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/quasar-announces-corporate-action-pinksheets-qasp-1539977.htm

Is vigil in Colorado to sell off a failing aviation business?