Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Actually, OnceBrokeMama posted first.
She's one of our primary go to, finding & posting gals.
Must've missed originally.
Some days, no time and go dormant, like the board has been today.
Anyway, about all of us have been waiting on this with restless anticipation.
It's about the last hurdle, IMO.
What many of us R waiting 4.
Summary (original link from 00Dylan):
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141583219
Also, believe post # 47183 (above) from OnceBrokeMama same thing.
>> CHANBOND/UOIP response out Today! Our lawyers continue
There is ABSOLUTELY NO JUSTIFIABLE REASON why the board should institute an inter partes review, or some JUDGES HAVE BEEN CORRUPTED and SOMETHING IS AMISS!
And welcome aboard,
Scruffer
No, but depends on if royalties in play.
Otherwise, could be one big settlement.
If go after Cisco 13 & others future use of technology and royalties, expect financials to become current.
This will foreshadow Carter's intent and where they are in their negotiation stage.
Moreover, if going after others, then royalties (to me) is the better play because the process will be on-going anyway.
All JMHO, Little Scruffy
Just the find & stock of the Quadranscentennial
>> 25 years
You may have just made it in time,
Scruffer
And recently saw this on TV
"You know, you charge too much for cable".
https://www.ispot.tv/ad/dbGT/americas-best-contacts-and-eyeglasses-lineman
People (jurors) just hate the cable companies.
A trial wouldn't go well for them, IMO.
Scruff
All those sound fantastic, awesome, incredible.
In all probability, it would be dispensed based on the pro-rata share of the 13's market capitalization and revenues however.
A smaller company just couldn't afford that, not equitable and quite unfair.
JMO.
My dream is to wake-up, log-in and just see DOLLARS.
No thinking involved, don't have to worry about selling (timing anything) and magically money appears.
Lastly and unfortunately, no vivid dreams by me. Maybe I need to put a dream catcher above my bed.
With inflation & time-value of money...
>> This is RELEVANT Mods. It's indicative of the stakes getting higher.
J&J ordered to pay $4.14 billion in talc cancer case.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/12/general-a.html?__source=newsletter%7Cbreakingnews
Who knows now what the settlement, judgment or verdict will be.
Little Scruffy
This isn't on anyone BIG's radar.
As I've always thought & written, this is that 1 in 10,000 stock.
It is an opportunity of a lifetime.
And we found it, we're in it, we all have shares.
Only >> Followers: 438
Most shares tightly held now.
The ARRIS IPR is very meaningful (to me).
PatentPlay has proved & written about that.
It's the last hurdle.
Just no volume so wouldn't worry about it.
Eventually, when all settles, they'll be talking about this on CNBC and wish owned stock, mentioning us lucky shareholders & the immense wealth created.
It's going to put Billy in the big leagues. He'll become a top VC.
All JMHO, Scruffer
Yes, rocki has it exact.
And since we NOW know UOIP is reporting to OTC (at least OS), then that number is (should be) correct.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UOIP/security
And confirmed by Jeff English (rstar).
Moreover, this number allows Olde Monmouth to confirm totals of who owns how many shares & their represented percentage since they count, track & total shares as the transfer agent.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141264193
LONG & STRONG ÜÖIP, Scruff
TY Goodbuddy4863. Silence until IPR decision.
Very little activity & posts.
There is ABSOLUTELY NO JUSTIFIABLE REASON why the board should institute an inter partes review, or some JUDGES HAVE BEEN CORRUPTED & SOMETHING IS AMISS!
Possible PROBE, INVESTIGATION, HEARING, INQUIRY, INSPECTION should occur.
Can I get a second to the motion... LOL.
Yes. Follow chain. Begins w rstar.
Just keep hitting RE: xxxx post#_____.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=142110387
Share count? $6B @ 5.53 per share?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140139266
Confirmed here.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UOIP/security
Also, $6B would be over twice the largest patent infringement verdict EVER.
Only way is trial and 3x. Then continual appeals.
In a perfect world, yes, but still believe could be one of the largest judgments ever, if trial.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141263836
The 13D was only current when Carter took control.
Have to account for converted noteholders, 44.7M to Deirdre Leane, ChanBond, the patent inventors and us (open market).
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UOIP/disclosure
Not sure how calculated $5.53/share but an extremely "Ultimate Optimist".
I'm still in the $1.2B ($0.75/share) to $3.2B ($2.00/share) camp.
JMHÖ.
For those curious or asking (privately), trying...
Trying to determine the relationship between daily Buy/Sell trades and FINRA (naked) short reporting, if there is one.
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/unifiedonline-inc-UOIP/trades
In ORF: http://regsho.finra.org/regsho-Index.html
or: https://otcshortreport.com/company/UOIP
All I know is the SHORTS BETTER:
TESTED! .... %,`~\ .... Got me???
20180710 |UOIP| 752903 |0| 795903 |O
http://regsho.finra.org/FORFshvol20180710.txt
This will change (refresh 4 new day) if do not see b4 early am.
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/unifiedonline-inc-UOIP/trades
Even if eliminate the 169,000 Buy, numbers don't jive.
Hmmmmmmm?
Not quite sure how that number is derived or calculated.
Need another day of testing.
Test your theory. Think did once/twice.
Don't have time today/tonight, but capture screen at EOD.
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/unifiedonline-inc-UOIP/trades
Then compare.
Under ORF.
http://regsho.finra.org/regsho-Index.html
I'm pretty sure doesn't equate, if remember correctly.
Then we'll all know for sure.
Yes, that's true. Sold 1st, but covered?
Yes, the Market Maker may & usually sells first to meet (and make) the market and/or fill demand.
But what rstar may be implying is...
>> How much throughout the day did the market maker buy back stock and cover?
I still believe in rising market, the (naked) short volume is higher than many believe.
It's just my opinion. It's how they play this game (as described in previous posts).
Agree. Probably IPR presuppositions & postulations.
It's their last hope and our last major hurdle, IMO.
Oh, Cox is included. My bad.
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426386/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Atlantic_Broadband_Group,_LLC
Missed adding it to the Market Cap, Rev and NI calculations.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=138868669
My mind must've been elsewhere b/c I'm too young for senior moments (I hope).
Sfufrecr
Stupid Question Time, S?T; Cox Communication?
Informed/Learned of UOIP in mid June 2017.
Unfortunately, missed the trips (.000x).
Probably already asked & answered but missed if addressed,
>> How come Cox Communication not part of Cisco 13 (14)?
http://newsroom.cox.com/news-releases?item=151
Thank you, Scruff
No! Gr8 thing ChanBond <> Rembrandt
As we know, ChanBond's patents are legit and have merit.
Not only did they infringe, Charter & Mediacom basically ADMITTED it. (As you previously posted).
http://www.ieyenews.com/wordpress/sanctions-smack-down-six-years-later/
https://www.law360.com/articles/897808/comcast-other-cable-cos-get-51m-fees-in-rembrandt-mdl
https://www.law360.com/articles/696138/rembrandt-mdl-deemed-exceptional-for-payoffs-spoliation
It appears Rembrandt was out-of-control. A true troll.
Yes, rockie101 is correct
Short % Increase / Decrease = 742 %
(381,500 - 45,300) / 45,300 = 7.42 * 100 (percent) = 742 %
Appears this site rounds to the lot (100th).
http://shortsqueeze.com/?symbol=uoip&submit=Short+Quote%E2%84%A2
That's the "Equity Short Interest" (second/dark tab), reported bimonthly.
https://otcshortreport.com/company/UOIP
There is some debate on exactly what the "Naked Short Interest" means and how much the Market Makers ACTUALLY covered (bought back shares after selling first).
My belief is the MMs are short more than think since caught in rising market the last 3 months.
Do NOT believe they had opportunity to cover much of the stock making market for.
The volumes during those days just did NOT equate.
If they did cover on many of those days, they took substantial daily losses.
Here's the 6-month chart.
http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=uoip&insttype=&freq=1&show=&time=7
Scruff
No change in Outstanding Shares, 1,614,601,069
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UOIP/security
I'd be extremely happy with half that: $1.50 per share.
And thanks. I'll look into it.
Happy United States of America Independence Day everyone.
These 56 brave and courageous men risked everything for our freedoms.
http://www.nhccs.org/destiny.html
http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/
Scruffer
Welcome JamMasterMike. Anything possible b/c corruption exists
Typically, do not play the OTC BB or Pink Sheet stocks, but this is the exception.
All of my posts are for UOIP & only OTCBB or Pinkie stock believe in.
You have to make your own decisions, but IMO (for what it's worth), this is the 1 (& only) stock out there.
It can be a life-style upgrade.
Most of these companies are shorted by the Market Makers.
Reasons listed:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140681693
Lawsuits settled or won:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141263836
If get any significant windfall, I'm going to invest in diversified mutual funds & leave this arena.
The over-the-counter stocks can be and are extremely risky, but this one is legit. The rate-of-return is enormous.
Outstanding due diligence here but must do some homework.
It could take you a few days to get up to speed.
No "Justifiable reason IPR instituted":
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141587385
Acknowledgement of infringing:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141263683
Anyway, have lots to read through. Unfortunately, have to go.
Til tomorrow or Monday, Scruffer
Depressing? This is that 1 in 10,000 stock.
It's an opportunity of a lifetime.
Not sure if entered the stock late (higher cost), but this is a PROBABLE standard-of-living life changer.
And we're in IT. You found it. You've got shares.
It's been 3+ years. Another 6 months is nothing.
Believe WHEN ARRIS IPR institution DENIED (if law followed), we'll solidify another lower-base price. Up, up & on our way.
Moreover and importantly, all shares are common. No preferred so no dividends owed in arrears and nothing hidden.
As you know, this means Carter's shares, as well as converted noteholders and ours, are ALL the same.
We're all in this boat together. Sink or swim, cruise, speedboat higher.
Odds highly in our favor at this point in the legal process.
Also, like zombywolf, think only real option is for ARRIS to acquire Chanbonds patents. Cisco & cable companies will probably kick-in some too. Plus, any ARRIS insurance against infringement.
Which they clearly have infringed upon Chanbond's patents. It's basically already been acknowledged by Charter & Mediacom.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141041557
Lastly, ARRIS (via the cable companies) cannot afford THE RISK of trial of treble damages, but at this point the judge may rule WILLFUL INTENT and/or EGREGIOUS MISCONDUCT so exceedingly promotes the reason to settle or buy UOIP's shares ASAP (if/when DENIED IPR).
You may enjoy and appreciate this Proudfoamer.
Thinking liability split among all modems sold
As well as, type of modem.
Cisco may be on the hook for as much as 1/3.
Cable companies may have to kick-in some too.
Probably hashing it out and trying to come to a compromise.
Anyway, it appears Arris is just gonna have to raise the price so another pass-through for cable operators.
Big windfall, but don't see anything above $3.2B, unless liability shared.
Must get DENIAL OF IPR INSTITUTION 1st.
Over-and-out, Scruff
Have a good weekend crew.
It's gonna be hot, hot.
ARRIS is quite indebted, but has $3B+
Weird 10-K, 10-Q.
Looking for Change in Cash Flow From Operations.
"As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $2,161.4 million in total indebtedness and $498.3 million available under our revolving line of credit to support our working capital needs. Our debt service obligations with respect to this indebtedness could have an adverse impact on our earnings and cash flows for as long as the indebtedness is outstanding."
Anyway, makes it harder to go to trial. Can't afford risk of $3x.
Believe must buy. No other practical option.
In addition, maybe they have insurance policy to hedge against infringement.
Couldn't find, but my research time is up.
Scruff
Ditto.
Just ecstatic they have the $3B in stockholders' equity.
Big, BIG, huge relief.
Never really focused on ARRIS financials until now.
Great call zombywolf.
Excellent deduction, reasoning and logic.
See folks, learn it all here.
Great teamwork informing board here.
Going to lunch.
Now that dug through B/S, ON-BOARD.
Arris had been stockpiling cash into Shareholder Equity from reading the Balance Sheet.
Starting in 2016. Interesting... Bery, bery interesting.
Arris has $3B+ saved for this very reason.
Go get 'em Carter.
And now relieved.
Plus, agree 100%. ARRIS has to, must, highly probable buy originating DOCSIS PATENTS.
All smiles, if law followed, when IPR institution DENIED.
Scruff
Appears so. Our saving grace = SHE
Arris had aggressively accummulated STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY in 2016.
Coincidence. (This is rhetorical; thinking to myself on this Friday).
https://ycharts.com/companies/ARRS/shareholders_equity
Total ARRIS International plc stockholders’ equity
Balance, December 31, 2015 = 1,793,914,000
Balance, December 31, 2016 = 3,188,816,000
Balance, December 31, 2017 = 3,168,567,000
10-K
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1645494/000119312518066821/d505150d10k.htm#fin505150_6
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stockholdersequity.asp
In diving into the balance sheet, it appears ARRIS is in a much stronger position than thought and informed.
Scruffer
I like this scenario much better
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141875775
Yes, yes. Now, AT&T on hook 4 TW.
My estimate isn't that high however.
I'm more in the $1.2B [$0.75/share] to 5.1B [$3.18/share] range.
And, of course, it's gonna be material & significant!!!
https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/do-public-companies-need-to-disclose-financial-ter-1846380.html
Cisco 13 Yearly Revenue > 172B
Market Cap ~ 400B, not including Cisco and Arris.
Comcast, Charter & TW are monsters.
>>>> Calculated Tuesday, 02/27/18
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=138868669
Mediacom, LLC. is the 5th largest with 1.4 million customers.
https://mediacomcommunicationscorporation.gcs-web.com/
Scruffer
When is ARRIS IPR decision due?
Each to his/her own. Buy, sell or hold. It doesn't matter to me.
I'm 100% long.
If anything, may buy more.
Oh, and a point of sell-off is place FUD in your head.
Trading is 90% psychological. The other half is luck.
Thank you, Scruffer
Anyone notice a 300 share trade yesterday?
Didn't want to happen, but if believe MM signals,
300 = Take down the PPS to get shares.
http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=013692;p=0
Every time MMs do this or attack with blitzkrieg, defend pretty well (so far).
They are such manipulators!
Could be last opportunity to buy share around 0.02 though (if get filled).
http://counterfeitingstock.com/CS2.0/CounterfeitingStock.html
Lastly, FEAR is not your friend.
BUY & HOLD, LONG & STRONG UOIP, Scruffer
Totally AGREE. ARRIS IPR last hurdle.
There is ABSOLUTELY NO JUSTIFIABLE REASON why the board should institute an inter partes review, or some JUDGES HAVE BEEN CORRUPTED!
Possible PROBE, INVESTIGATION, HEARING, INQUIRY, INSPECTION should occur.
The stock will go to a "Whole 'Nother Level".
One of my favorites, Dr. Gregory "Condo" House, M.D.
Tuesday's Tickler.
Besides Arris or Cisco, AMAZON!!!
Think about it.
Amazon web services.
Control the cable modem market.
Build "stuff" (secretly...Shhh, "Don't tell anyone) inside modem to demodulate in favor of Amazon Prime Video, TV, Internet, Fire Stick, Alexa...
Yes, they aren't suppose to do it, but it happens.
Fool once or second time the charm.
>> Fool me once and shame on you (Motorola).
>> Fool me twice and shame on me (Google)
or
>> Second time is the charm.
Google is selling Motorola, the iconic handset maker it bought for $12.5 billion in May of 2012, to Chinese PC maker Lenovo for $2.91 billion.(Tellingly, Google is retaining the rights to Motorola's patents, but will license them to Lenovo.) Jan 29, 2014
https://qz.com/172207/why-google-just-sold-motorola-to-lenovo-for-3-billion/
I don't see it, but hey, anything is possible.
Oops, YEARLY REVENUE.
Also, if goes to trial & loses, 3x judgement.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=138812366
IMO, must settle.
Trial too expensive if judgment & time to pull the plugs on all those modems.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140219719
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140218704
Some have as high as $5B. Range from 0.20 to $5B+.
Later
Welcome VC3. Cisco 13 have 172B+ in monthly rev.
Yes, well aware of AnthonyC.
That would be ~$1B settlement. Probably low however. Conservative estimate.
Believe MMs are on the wrong side of the trade. Short 50M+, so purposely constraining SP. Many doubt my theory.
All JMHÖ.
Have to be quick but here are some of my links.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141589211
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141263836
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141108438
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=138868669
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141263683
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141587385
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140681693
Great DD here. A lot to sift through within message board. Can spend entire day catching-up.
Until tomorrow, Scruff
I'll play. New high of 0.0314
I'm a LONG super optimist and only stinky pinkie play.
It appears MMs are holding this down. They are suppressing a run.
The rate-of-return is ginormous, colossal, immense.
The DENIED STAY was a huge victory. Momentum in SP is overdue.
One more hurdle nevertheless.
To me (for what it's worth), there is NO JUSTIFIABLE REASON why the board should institute an inter partes review, or SOMETHING IS AMISS!
My new minimum = 0.67, so that's a 27+ bagger from here. Can't find that ROR anywhere else.
But think actual settlement and/or trial number will be higher, possibly considerably higher.
JMHO, Scruffer
P.S. And welcome aboard. Outstanding crew here. Extremely knowledgeable.