AI
Saturday, June 16, 2018 10:45:52 AM
Gr8 post EB. Got your link 2. TY
I'm in the camp, MMs are on the wrong side of the trade.
Some doubt and discount this theory, but explains the low volume fills and repressed PPS.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141554670
One last big "Subjective or Objective?" hurdle with Arris IPR.
To me (for what it's worth), there is NO JUSTIFIABLE REASON why the board should institute an inter partes review, or something is amiss!
Moreover, the skull-and-crossbones & financials not being current don't help, but presently not important to Carter.
If become current, believe royalty plan to be scheduled to allow ARRIS to spread their liability over 5+ years and remain a going-concern.
JMHO, Scruffer
TGISaturday.
I'm in the camp, MMs are on the wrong side of the trade.
Some doubt and discount this theory, but explains the low volume fills and repressed PPS.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141554670
One last big "Subjective or Objective?" hurdle with Arris IPR.
To me (for what it's worth), there is NO JUSTIFIABLE REASON why the board should institute an inter partes review, or something is amiss!
Moreover, the skull-and-crossbones & financials not being current don't help, but presently not important to Carter.
If become current, believe royalty plan to be scheduled to allow ARRIS to spread their liability over 5+ years and remain a going-concern.
JMHO, Scruffer
TGISaturday.
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
