Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Done. And look what I got:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=The+Black+Book
Now, who knows where your link is. Maybe on page 100? LOL!
I know you know better than to trust an obscure source. With that, I'll restate you're a liar interested in stirring up hate.
Did the news source also show women and children picnicing at the burning as well? A lynching? No one disagrees that lynching occured. Just not to the degree you're lying about.
You're terminally dishonest to believe your own posts and then when challenged, just throw up a violent crime. If you research, you'll see black on white violent crime in the last 10 years as well.
What is making you lie so much here?
Liar. Black and Native American slaves were hanged if accused of a crime or misstep. But not burned alive.
Also, regarding bringing children and women to lynchings as a tradition. You know as well as everyone else here that's a lie as well.
Let's noodle out some simple thought as well. As inhumane slaves were treated, they were also COMMODITIES. They were ASSETS. They were treated horribly but not put to death the way you think.
What state do you come from? Please don't say Georgia.
_____________________________________________________
As long as we read only that with which we agree, we learn nothing. - Chester Dolan
Darn. I guess my first reply to this post was deleted so I'll leave out the wit this time.
NAFTA was a Republican initiative in 1992. It was signed into law by who in 1993?
Let's go further. You like to exercise the binary view of politics here. That being said, what do you think about Bill Clinton for signing into law something that George Bush the first road mapped?
Does that mean you believe GW's dad had at least ONE good point? Does that mean Bill Clinton made a mistake? And do you believe NAFTA reduced jobs in America? For me, I'm not happy with NAFTA because it does NOT levy a tarrif on jobs outsourced from this country. I can't tell you which president should have added that language but I'm leaning towards the one that signed the initiative into law.
If so, considering the time frame of accellerated outsourcing, under what administration had the challenge of dealing with the bulk of lost American jobs due to outsourcing? I know the answer to this one. Hehehe
You wanted to talk employment and jobs. I'm just stating the facts of each admin's environment. I'm not running away from any argument here and eagerly await your rebuttle.
VERY weak. I live in what was one of the fastest growing county's in the COUNTRY. We had that reputation 3 or 4 years ago, I believe. New neighborhood developements stopped. In my area, there is a neighborhood with brand new homes that have been sitting for 2 years!
Californians will like to know that these are 3 - 4k sq ft homes with basements priced just under 300k! I think you could pick one up for 270k or so. Not that you guys would want to move to this side of the continent. LOL!
Yeah, I wasn't aware. I was leveraging the post you responded to with an Edit thanking you for the heads up.
We have to stop the posturing because Russia wants a fight, IMO.
I had some USO calls that I had a GTC order on @ 4.40! I forgot about them but they filled @ 5.50. Nice!
.IYSIQ USO SEP 95 Calls
I don't have the nerve to short it though. LOL!
I saw that. What it tells me is that Russia was never interested in peace or democracy. How could a "defense system" be alarming to a super power like Russia? What if Canada or Mexico wanted a "defense system" installed by Russia? Would the U.S. count that to be a threat? I guess in today's environment, the answer would be yes.
IMO, Russia's dying to hit the trigger and considering that, there should be a major arms race not in just Europe but in the West as well.
Edit - Thanks for the clarification on the NATO "nukes". Was not aware of that. We better stop posturing.
_____________________________________________________
As long as we read only that with which we agree, we learn nothing. - Chester Dolan
I noticed you failed to respond correctly and completely. Yes, NAFTA was a Republican initiative. Who signed it into law? Hint, it was 1993 when it happened. Do your own research.
But you also failed to answer the rest of the pertinent questions:
Considering NAFTA was enacted in 1993, who's administration took on the most outsourcing activity?
When did the tech bubble grow and when did it burst?
You see? I won't place the blame on any one President. You are showing to have a binary view of politics and economy. By doing so, you leave out a lot of selective history to convince yourself you're right. Political parties are like stocks. You shouldn't marry any of them.
You never answered my question from yesterday. In your opinion, was it John's fault for being raped (assuming it's true)? If so, do you also believe that a woman being raped is her fault?
Let's assume you had a son. He's 10 and was molested and raped by another man whom happens to be a friend of the family over the course of a year. Is that your son's fault? What age and circumstance removes the fault from the attacker?
Lastly, yesterday you said you would "kill" your children if they came to you and advised they were gay. Now, did you mean that in a "Ah man, I'd killem if they came to me with that crap." Or were you really talking cut their throat, drown, or bullet to the head kill them?
You claim to have a multimillion dollar business. So which are you? Did you get your's "off the backs of the working class?" Or were you the type that "lied, cheated, and stole your whole life... while getting it off the working class?"
You sound like you have the courage of your convictions here and are making me doubt you own a multimillion dollar business, or multimillion dollar recording offer (you claimed to turn down).
That being said, you like to post "you are the truth" or whatever. But unless you're prepared to conceed to being in one of the two categories you pegged wealthy people in, you're going to have to admit that you are NOT the truth. LOL!
What a quandary. Finite statements just don't work. Hehehe
Come on Tinner, I'm still waiting:
Posted by: samaelrocks Date: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 9:21:08 AM
In reply to: tinner who wrote msg# 347443 Post # of 347713
You just let us know when you're ready to understand the differences in the global environment each President has had and you'll find the answers yourself. How much outsourcing was going on under Clinton compared to GW? And who signed NAFTA? When did the tech bubble burst and when was it being created? After you research without your partisian goggles stuck to your eye balls, you'll then appreciate the fact that GW has enjoyed record low unemployment.
Good luck with that!
Edit - Hey, Tinner! I'm waiting. LOL!
Edit II - Tinner! Come on man. You had to know that you had to consider the economies each President had to deal with, eh? You know as well as I that you can't just peer at the surface and make idiotic statements, right? Come on. I really would like to see if you can answer honestly here. Did NAFTA have an effect on job creations or loss? Did the tech bubble have an effect on job creations or loss? That's just two examples. LOL! Holding my breath here.
I didn't find Cindy's quotes or story to be able and keep it in context. But here's my take.
I've never met Yngwie Malmsteen or Zakk Wyldd. But both have encouraged me to be a better guitarist. Whether they know it or not (they don't), both artists have convinced me to keep studying the instrument.
As for being an only child only to find out that she has 2 half sisters...
My wife's parents divorced when she was 7 or 8. She was the only child. Father stayed in Cali. Mother moved to Georgia. Both remarried and by the time my wife was 11, both her mother and father had more children. She did not get to see her father very much and never got to know her half brother and sister. In fact, by the time twins came along, my wife was 26 and married to me! On her mother's side, she had a half brother and sister. She had to babysit them and due to the age difference, they were viewed more like "kids" rather than siblings. Therefore, I can PERSONALLY relate to anyone stating they were an only child when in fact they have half siblings. My wife will tell you that she was an only child.
I can't speak to Cindy's relationship with her half siblings though. What's the age difference? Who stayed with who? How often did they see each other?
This ain't good at all:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080820/ap_on_re_eu/georgia_russia
Russians dig in as pullback drags on in Georgia By MIKE ECKEL, Associated Press Writer
2 hours, 15 minutes ago
SACHKHERE, Georgia - Russian forces on Wednesday built a sentry post just 30 miles from the Georgian capital, appearing to dig in to positions deep inside Georgia despite pledges to pull back to areas mandated by a cease-fire signed by both countries.
IMO, Russia was looking to start a war. Georgia were just the unfortunate ones to pull the trigger first. Georgia were idiots to move into the breakaway areas knowing the tension already there. Now we have American soldiers providing aid. I posted earlier and I'll post it again that by Friday, I have a feeling we will be at war with Russia.
I wonder if Israel is planning to strike Iran?
Last post of the day.
For those on this board, posting views on Homosexuality IS political. However, my apologies for the religion aspect. To that...
abbytraderwin, how in the world would a homosexual living next door to you be = to them forcing their lifestyle on you? You would KILL them? Are you looking into their bed room? WTF? Are you afraid they will sneak into your home and have sex with you while you are asleep?
Didn't you say earlier that you hate sin but not the individual? Yet you want to torture and/or kill homosexuals that get to close to you?
IF MY CHILDREN WERE TO TELL ME THAT THEY WERE GAY I WOULD KILL THEM. I HAVE TAUGHT THEM RIGHT FROM WRONG AND WHAT A SIN THAT IS. IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN. THEY KNOW THE CONSEQUENCES OF CHOOSING THAT LIFESTYLE.
You are indeed far sicker than I had imagined. Even after reading your post on enjoying the death of a representative of the U.S. hoping they are in hell, you have topped even that.
I can't speak for everyone here but I have to believe that if most people posting on this board today (democrat or republican) saw you hurting a child or person of any age, race, sexual preference due to your own sick bigotry, you'd find yourself in a box. Bigotry = cowardice and fear.
I don't believe I've read such vile, intolerance, hatred, or fanaticism on this forum to date. Hitler would absolutely adore you. He'd probably give you Auschwitz to run all to yourself. The Angel of Death has nothing on you... except for an education.
Besides homosexuals, would you mind letting the board know what other groups you deam unacceptable to survive in the world today? Then advise who you would support to be the next President of the U.S. so that everyone here will know EXACTLY who NOT to vote for... EVER.
My opinion is this:
I agree 100% with you that Obama will lose. I go further and suggest it will be a landslide defeat, though.
Americans understand tax burden more than they do of the government "budget".
I want taxes to remain low. I prefer the fair tax on it is a majority of Republicans that support that as well. Prostitutes will pay, criminals will pay, the drug cartel will pay, etc. I like that.
I believe low taxes = increased jobs and thus more Federal revenue. Bush's tax cuts proved that.
The deficit will go down with military spending when we get out of Iraq. I think McCain will get us out sooner and safer than Obama (safer for our new ally in Iraq, that is).
McCain is less likely than Bush to get wrapped up on abortion or homosexual issues. Obama would be better if your mostly interested in social issues but McCain will be neutral here.
A Muslim for President in this climate? The DNC had huge hopes due to being way out of the mainstream. They might as well have thrown up Howard Dean again.
McCain = Will take standard Republican votes as well as those of Southern Democrats.
Obama = Will not gain a single vote above what any other Democrat would have already gotten coupled with losing a lot of southern votes. If Obama wins, he'll still lose the popular vote and Republicans will go nuts! LOL!
Contrary to what Abby says, McCain will have far more military respect than Obama could get and this is needed in today's tense climate.
An independent would be better for localized social issues. But for today's global climate, I think we need someone that's been there for a while. Doesn't have to be McCain. But his wife owns a Beer Distributorship! How can you lose? LOL!
My honest opinions!
Uh oh! For all you pollsters out there:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080820/pl_politico/12656;_ylt=AmR2b4YWNSXlZSi6Uh9.SXJsnwcF
"McCain winning in new poll, follows trend"
Abby - Looks like America doesn't care that McCain was "butt-raped" as you say. LOL!
Go get them Condi! I like this response:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080820/ap_on_re_eu/poland_us_missile_defense
WARSAW, Poland - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and her Polish counterpart signed a deal Wednesday to build a U.S. missile defense base in Poland, an agreement that prompted an infuriated Russia to warn of a possible attack against the former Soviet satellite.
ADVERTISEMENT
Rice dismissed blustery comments from Russian leaders who say Warsaw's hosting of 10 U.S. interceptor missiles just 115 miles from Russia's westernmost frontier opens the country up to attack.
Such comments "border on the bizarre frankly," Rice said, speaking to reporters traveling with her in Warsaw.
"When you threaten Poland, you perhaps forget that it is not 1988," Rice said. "It's 2008 and the United States has a ... firm treaty guarantee to defend Poland's territory as if it was the territory of the United States. So it's probably not wise to throw these threats around."
OK. We get it. You think that Mother Theresa in all her good works globally is rotting in a biblical eternal hell because she doesn't believe the way you do.
As for Mormons, they take care of their own better than any other organized religion. They also reach out with the public. My daughter and I played soccer with a group of them this summer and some of the nicest people in the world. In fact, one coaches another girls team in a different club than I so we're going to put together a scrimmage game between his team and mine. I think both the parents and the girls will enjoy it.
As for whatever POS god you believe in that instilled that much hate in you, well, Fcuk your god. Satanists don't hate as much as you're showing here. In fact, YOUR type is the reason satanists mock religion and whatever god is being peddled into peoples' personal lives.
Do you lose sleep knowing there are millions of homosexuals around the globe sodomizing each other? I lose sleep because of this kind of crap: http://www.abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local/los_angeles&id=6337615
You keep mentioning McCain being raped. Are you like those Muslims who put women in jail because they were raped? Not sure what your point is. Was John's rape his fault?
Damn, you have some real problems with labels and the most hateful person I've read on this forum for a while. Congratulations! Meanwhile, I'll enjoy playing soccer with those evil Mormons, Catholics, Baptists (as long as they aren't handling poisonous snakes), and future lesbians. LOL!
Truely off your rocker. Here's how I know:
"I AM A TO THE RIGHT OF FAR RIGHT CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN!"
For the rest...
A patriot wouldn't get into matters of personal preference.
The items you posted that you support follow the party line to a capital "T".
Do you believe Catholics are members of a cult? Some baptists think that. Are you baptist?
I'm not worried about what you post. My vent towards your ridiculous anti-McCain rant was just a result of your irrationality. Considering your responses, I'm not at all shocked at your postings. They actually make sense now. LOL!
And you are reminding me of those conservatives that bashed McCain when he was running against GW in the primaries 8 years ago being accused of being too close to the center. Were you one of those?
You just let us know when you're ready to understand the differences in the global environment each President has had and you'll find the answers yourself. How much outsourcing was going on under Clinton compared to GW? And who signed NAFTA? When did the tech bubble burst and when was it being created? After you research without your partisian goggles stuck to your eye balls, you'll then appreciate the fact that GW has enjoyed record low unemployment.
Good luck with that!
Edit - Hey, Tinner! I'm waiting. LOL!
Edit II - Tinner! Come on man. You had to know that you had to consider the economies each President had to deal with, eh? You know as well as I that you can't just peer at the surface and make idiotic statements, right? Come on. I really would like to see if you can answer honestly here. Did NAFTA have an effect on job creations or loss? Did the tech bubble have an effect on job creations or loss? That's just two examples. LOL! Holding my breath here.
_____________________________________________________
As long as we read only that with which we agree, we learn nothing. - Chester Dolan
Who said this?
"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man."
Note, this same person also stated one reason that so many District of Columbia schools fail is the city's high minority population.
LOL! Soul Washer will have a cow over this one.
_____________________________________________________
As long as we read only that with which we agree, we learn nothing. - Chester Dolan
Man, America could get drawn into this by Friday:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080820/ap_on_re_eu/georgia_russia
You know it only takes one person to take a shot at an American convoy and it's done. That's pretty likely considering the Russians were firing on journalists.
IMO, we didn't send a relief convoy over there without backup either.
OK. Until someone can post some proof that John McCain was purposely caught by the North for political reasons, folks are way off line here.
ANYONE serving and suffers POW status is a war hero. I dare you to say otherwise to a group of vets and not on a message board. Then again, some vets wouldn't accept that label and simply state they were serving their country. Critisize that, eh?
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that you know leaps and bounds about the military and the government than anyone on this board. Whatever you say from your arm chair. That doesn't discount your disgracing of our service men on this forum. Al Gore knows more about the government and how to navigate through it than yourself. WTF cares?
I just wonder what the hell you were doing while McCain was being held prisoner in Hanoi for 5.5 years?
Attack his policies. Critisizing how he served as a POW is as wacko to the left as you can get. You and some others are acting like McCain had a suite with room service.
I would love to see you critisize McCain or any other service man to their face about how they acted as POW's. It would be a pay-per-view performance. Especially if they taped a sticker to your forehead that read, "I really do think I know everything and you don't."
When were you going to start posting about McCain's policies? It's easy to attack what you read on the Internet.
Hey, Arizona, it never occured to you that the the North Vietnese systematically lied about POW's, what they did, what they said, disclosed, etc. It's called propaganda. Hell, we use it in Iraq today.
If you were a POW, I wonder what you'd say to your captors when inticed with possible freedom after a couple of years?
It's amazing how in one day, these bozo's switched from comparing Obama and McCain initiatives to an all out attack on his service to this country.
Yeah, neocons have blood on their hands to. I remember Kerry's service being attacked as well. I guess McCain expected it considering our learning institutions in the U.S. are lacking. Apparently from funding. LOL!
LOL! I can't disagree with your breeding statement. I won't even go into who the usual suspects are since I only have this and one other post available today. Hehehe
But, my family and I are planning to move to Sacramento as soon as the housing market comes back... errrr... may 18 months? Don't know yet. We do know we want to get out of Atlanta though. So don't be too stingy about the Pacific North West area, eh? We have family out there.
Alright. Your rants are an insult to the U.S. military now. Not Bush or McCain. In fact, do you remember Admiral Stockdale? Ross Perot's running mate? Guess who was a POW with him? Yup, John McCain. Do you also remember the people that made fun of Admiral Stockdale because he spoke slow and made the quote, "Who am I? Why am I here?" Yeah, they made fun of him until they found out he was hard of hearing due to bamboo shoved in his ear during imprisonment. Your post reminds me of that time.
Our great military controls equipment that most of us couldn't concieve. And to bitch and moan about McCain having an accident? From your f'ing arm chair? Don't sit in it too long as to leave a dent. Please.
I have a link to an article about Admiral Stockdale. People with unreasonable views should never read it. They should simply act like an ass on public message boards to remove all doubt of said poster's ignorance.
Yeah, my dad was in Nam. My grandfather was in WWII. My wife's Grandfather was in Korea (I think it was). I have other uncles that were in the service. I have cousins in the service today. And all of them would conceed that the U.S. public doesn't know everything. But for one, they would all tell abbytraderwin to stick a fork in their persistence to find the negative in one's service to this great country. I'll speak for them as I post that abbytraderwin should go kiss some military ass and ask for forgiveness for your insults from those that serve.
_____________________________________________________
As long as we read only that with which we agree, we learn nothing. - Chester Dolan
We aren't anywhere near the point of peoples' water to their homes being dry.
We'll outlaw pools, water parks, water sports, beverage manufacturers, etc. before that happens.
In Nandi Hills, Kenya where my mother lived, she had 2 tanks that purified captured rain water. She had enough to share with neighbors if it came to that. Interestingly enough, in Kenya, it is illegal to deny water to someone who needs it if you have the means. Of course, a lot of folks would simply stock bottled water.
We are a LOOOOOOOOONG way away from running out of water.
You've just uncovered the conspiracy for starting WWIII. It's not for oil, food, or land. It's for population control. LOL! Just kidding.
As far as our high populations, all I can say are there are new neighborhoods in my area that aren't selling houses for the last almost 2 years. I believe areas with water shortages and food for that matter, are underdeveloped areas lacking technology and funding.
Look at Soul Washer's great continent of Africa as an example. There's PLENTY of space for population growth. And the continent has more resources than the U.S. 10 fold (my opinion). Why is there a food shortage? Why are men leaving their families in Kenya to get food or not be a burden on them? Why is gas so expensive there? Lack of funding, technology and leadership. Well, the leaders have all the funding and technology... they just don't share it.
END MAJOR OUTSOURCING OF JOBS - Or levy a heavy Tarrif on them.
REDUCE ALL TYPES OF VISAS - Agreed. Look at Bill gates wanting more h Visas for Indians (India types)
SECURE THE BORDERS BY COMPLETING THE WALL - Yup
PUT AS MANY MILITARY UNITS ON THE BORDERS AS POSIBLE - Yup and wouldn't need that many. We have technology to leverage as well.
FINE AND JAIL BUSINESS OWNERS THAT HIRE ILLEGAL ALIENS - Yup
IMMEDIATELY DEPORT IN A HUMANE FASHION ALL ILLEGAL ALIENS - We already do. And we pay AeroMexico to do it. How screwed up is that?
DEPORT ALL ILLEGAL ALIEN PRISONERS - Or execute depending on the crime. Appeals done ONLY in English.
IMPROVE EMPLOYMENT OF AMERICAN CITIZENS - Employment is already pretty low.
START LIMITED AND MONITORED WORKER VISAS - Yup
INCREASE BORDER PATROL POWERS - Yup
INCREASE INS POWERS - Where an INS T-shirt to the emergency rooms in America to clear them out. LOL!
Better off? Hardly. We're reaping the rewards of appeasing terrorist. Don't give us any crap about 9/11 because that was being planned out before GW took office and Clinton had the same obscure info about the attack as GW.
We're not better off because the times are more challenging. Lenders were pressured to offer more risky loans to those with bad credit so here we are today with that whole mess. You decide who whined about lack of mortgages for people with bad credit.
Don't tell me about a Clinton surplus. Even today, law makers are spending money... errr... trying to:
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/election-year-raises-house-earmarks-2008-08-18.html
Election year raises House earmarks
By Kevin Bogardus
Posted: 08/18/08 12:58 PM [ET]
House lawmakers with one eye on their reelection battles have approved more earmarks this year than last year, according to a budget watchdog group.
Yeah, you can blame GW for increased spending. You can challenge the war in Iraq. But you CANNOT pin the blame solely on Republicans lest you become a partisian hypocrite.
These will look good today, IMO:
.TRAUI TRA SEP 45 Puts
I won't say GW wasn't a spender. I've posted that several times. He did cut taxes and help boost the economy. Here's unemployment rates from the beginning of Clinton's term and Bush's. Pretty impressive, eh?:
1993 6.9
1994 6.1
1995 5.6
1996 5.4
1997 4.9
1998 4.5
1999 4.2
2000 4.0
2001 4.7
2002 5.8
2003 6.0
2004 5.5
2005 5.1
2006 4.6
2007 4.6
http://www.bls.gov/cps/prev_yrs.htm
Regarding surplus, yes, Clinton handed off a surplus but also higher taxes. How do you think those higher taxes would have an effect on the economy if they were still at those levels today? I'll agree all day we have to cut spending to reduce the deficit. Raising taxes is a quick fix on the books but a long term drag on the economy.
If you can't see the hypocrisy of whining about a 60 year old in-law tie to the mob, I can't help ya. But I can provide another link:
http://www.slate.com/?id=1038
Yeah, yeah, Obama is the candidate and not Hilary... yet. But the selective outrage is ridiculous at best. I'm pretty sure that if you dug into 75% of the U.S. population's ties, you'll be able to connect them to organized crime in some frivolous manner.
Republicans always do? LOL!
http://money.cnn.com/2004/01/22/news/economy/nber/index.htm
"Did recession begin in 2000?
Group that dates economic cycles considers extending most recent downturn; possible boon for Bush.
January 22, 2004: 3:01 PM EST
By Mark Gongloff, CNN/Money Staff Writer
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - The committee of economists that sets the dates of U.S. recessions and expansions is considering moving the starting point of the latest recession to as early as November 2000 -- which could provide some political cover for President Bush."
Now, the cost of the Iraq war and GW's spending didn't help. But GW wasn't given a booming economy either.
LOL! How do I know not one Democrat is outraged over this?
"Rose Law Firm" That's how.
Now looking at the blog, you're talking almost 60 years ago his FATHER-IN-LAW had some dealings.
Let's fast forward to the bottom of the blog talking about McCain pressuring Bush to remove Russia from the Group of Eight.
McCain turned out to be right on about that, right? LOL!
But today, Obama supports a Muslim killer that uses rape as a weapon and a machette as the weapon of choice for the kill in Kenya. Nice.
Howard Dean says Republicans are the "white" party:
http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/08/17/howard-dean-the-race-card-and-the-white-party/
To expand, he said “Even Women ….are more successful in the Democratic Party”.
Going further, here's a question. How can some white dude from a state with less than 1% of the population being black know anything about race relations? Southern schools are more integrated than any up north.
I started chuckling way back when the DNC made him their chairman. That was a BAD move back then and still shows today.
Do Democrats really think they'll retain power having Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House, Howard Dean as the chairman of the DNC, and Barak Obama as the Presidential candidate? LOL! Can you say "out of touch?"
Hilary had a better chance than Barak, IMO. She still may be the candidate. LOL! Let's see.
Kill them all:
"More than 3,400 people — mostly militants — have been killed in insurgency-related violence this year, according to an Associated Press count based on figures from Western and Afghan officials."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080819/ap_on_re_as/afghan_violence
Apparently, all you have to do is get close to them and they kill themselves. LOL!
"(The Afghan National Army) is saying that anytime we get close to them, they detonate themselves," Jamal said.
So we can kill them and not even use our (or Afgan's) own fire power to do it.
Anyone have estimates on how many "militants" we'll have to go through before this is over? What % of Muslims are the radical type?
At the risk of providing false hope, here's our chart. I'm in these as well but look at the RSI. For IBM, it usually doesn't stay below 50 more than a couple of days. Today was day 2 under 50 and it dropped pretty big:
Edit - I'm also thinking it bounces from the new recent low it created today.
_____________________________________________________
As long as we read only that with which we agree, we learn nothing. - Chester Dolan
IBM oughta kick some butt tomorrow AM and offer another entry for calls.
Let's see what happens! LOL!