Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Happens all the time. They may move up to grab a lot or down to sell a lot just to provide liquidity - in other words, they may elect to take the other side of a trade in the middle of the spread.
Additionally, I would assume that their platforms allow for two sets of numbers - their "advertised" bid and ask and then the "real" bid they would fill (possibly higher) and real ask (possibly lower) they would sell for. That is certainly the way I would program the system and it took about 15 seconds to think of that design.
It is exactly the same as when you sell a used car. You might list it at $10K, but know all along you would take $9500 in a heartbeat.
This is not evidence of a conspiracy or manipulation despite what many say.
There is no short in the world that is scared of BBIG's financials.
It would be odd for one of those to start on a Friday
263 shares at .0083 is $2.18
Maybe they ARE putting their money where their mouth is, but they are barely whispering...
There is no requirement to pre-announce a date for earnings. They are due on a specific date (45 days after quarter end or 60 days after fiscal year end for the annuals). If a company can't meet that date they file an NT to get an automatic 5 day extension.
Assuming BBIG had only a quarter end and not fiscal year end on 9/30, the quarterly financials are due 11/15.
When companies pre-announce a date, they are usually doing it to get the date and time for the related conference call out to the public.
I don't know whether BBIG has held earnings calls in the past or not.
If part of your short agenda is to sponsor an interview that is actually a thinly disguised hit piece, you sell/short as much as you can after that interview. Nothing else would be expected.
They certainly have not precipitated a general sell off or swayed the opinion of long term holders.
I added to my calls today.
No podcaster is going to move LWLG substantially either way. It's just noise.
Or it might not.
I am not holding my breath.
It will happen when it happens.
Right - at least part of the payment (if not all of it) needs to be contingent on some specific progress towards a deal. Something like an LOI, not just an introduction.
I hope Deng comes back with something more specific than "just walk that way until you get wet".
Those numbers seem to fit together. I hope Deng actually found something.
Speaking in general terms, I have my doubts as to whether ASKH management could find the ocean from the beach.
I bought a Dec 5 call for 2.15 with all the cash I had left :)
I did not get any either - put in a stinker after I got an alert about the low price but no dice.
Yep - that was a very important milestone and alone makes this a big week for DBMM. I think we should be happy for that and not disappointed that we did not see the CE drop this week as well.
Given how long we have waited with ABSOLUTELY NOTHING happening, this week constitutes major progress.
Some volume and dumping on AESO today. Looks like at least some of this was forced sales due to margin calls as there were trades at .0002 and .0011 and .0031
I doubt that means much. While 722K volume is a spike for ASKH, it only represents about $35K in dollar volume. Meh.
It is going to take a while, and the next couple months could be rough as EVERYONE who bought the stock in almost the last 3 years is underwater. We could see some tax selling with positions reestablished in January.
That said, we could see tax selling in 90% of the stocks on the NASDAQ this year.
That is an interesting thought. DuPont certainly would have the financial muscle and process chemistry expertise to manufacture goo at scale. That is something I have always wondered - how would a little company like LWLG be able to scale up production one it was time to go out of the lab to support "ubiquitous" adoption?
Imagine having DuPont as your "contract manufacturer".
Theoretically they could, but there is nowhere near enough liquidity or volume.
was that MoneyMaker guy actually IN ATVK for that run, or did he just go back and find a stock that ran and say "we're gonna be like that"?
I don't think there is any conspiracy here.
Do we know what the issue was?
Let's see if they say anything about it. They might not even know yet - I have seen that happen before.
I'll try to call them later this morning to ask about it.
I doubt that - OTC Markets has a criteria driven framework for classifying stocks.
Are you absolutely sure that all of XCPL's filings are current? I saw a couple other tickers I follow get the same downgrade today. The timing suggests that all had something due 10/31 that was not filed on time or filed correctly.
XCPL went from Pink Current to Pink Limited (yield sign) on OTC Markets today
DBMM Haiku - at first
I thought you had written, but
5-7-5 it's not....
...that's "DBMM" as one syllable :)
Mining is very capital intensive. I would prefer they focus on the remediation services.
Does anyone really care about the mining operations anymore given the big contract for dam remediation? Seems like the old mining stuff is off on a very cool back buner for the foreseeable future.
LOOK at the pic you posted
Partnernip?
That's some pretty high-priced rental space. Hop this signals they have clients right there in the immediate area (the PR indicates 250 east coast personnel, but is not specific to the area right around Rockefeller Center).
In addition to Rockefeller Center itself, there are lots of high-end offices and stores like Tiffany's and Saks right nearby.
That is speculation at this point, based on how long it has taken for OTC Markets to make similar changes for other tickers. There is no set schedule. Additionally, once OTC Markets makes its change, it usually can take a few days for any given broker to pick up the change.
You need to monitor the OTC Markets site, and be prepared to call in your order once OTC-M has made the change (and possibly speak directly to the compliane team at your broker as their systems may lag in picking up the change).
$6.95 per trade for anything on the otc (includes pink). Multiple fills against the same order on the same day count as one trade, if those fills are spread over multiple days you get hit with a commission every day there is a fill. Note that if you get a partial fill, then change the limit price on the remainder, that counts as two separate orders so two commissions.
I am a pretty active trader and they have not been willing to negotiate on commissions with me.
As for warrants, there is a two part answer. Most penny stock warrants trade otc so there would be the $6.95 commission. However, most warrants associated with SPACs trade NASDAQ so no commission on those.
I too am not a big fan of AON orders on otc stocks. If the spread is very small I just hit the bid. If the spread is larger, I will usually set my order somewhere just under the ask - sufficiently above the bid to handle multiple commissions if I get fills over several days.
EDIT: the only time I have been able to have Schwab waive commissions is when I have wanted a "courtesy trade" to get out of a worthless stock position so I could claim the loss. They are pretty good about waiving commissions in that circumstance.
So is winter...
Correct - brokerages only started imposing the CE restrictions around September of last year, if I recall correctly.
I doubt that anything else was dependent on Ronaldinho. I would think that would take a little bit of management time but should not take away cycles from the people who would be working on name change etc.
You are spamming.
Maybe not Monday, but later in the week as EOM margin calls come due. Brookers usually square up their books at month end.
US brokers have been accepting sell orders all the time we have been waiting - that has never been an issue and is meaningless.
There is no reason they would cancel your order.
Thanks. I don’t use the Schwab website. I use their Street Smart Edge trading platform. I don’t think the code shows there.