Oh, so you're just looking at when a bollinger narrows? That actually makes sense and could be looked at as a trusted indicator. I dont know why you`re not just monitoring bollinger bands then? I would pair that with an RSI or MACD. I usually watch a set of indicators and the fundamentals of core tech. That might give you an indication of whether your indicator might gap up or down. Wouldn't consider it bullet proof. The ultimate indicator in this example would be the sentiment of the market maker. Think about that in relation to this quote:

The sentiment of the market maker is always based on the objective of maximizing their profit.

See, in that chart I see 3 premarket gap ups, If there was no rhyme or reason in fundamentals, sentiment etc. I`d say it was manipulation. Possibly in a pump and dump. No matter the reason it's been analyzed 90% of gaps eventually fill.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botnet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_engineering_(political_science)

Try to guess where Im going with these in relation to gaps on a ticker. I found it enlightening. I`ll give you a hint. People are the organic computers in a bot army.

Does that "indicator" need a monthly subscription??I honestly cant comment on it's effectiveness since I've never traded with it. What time line are we talking here? My current timeline here is my own death, company dissolution aka LOONG, hence why I discuss the medical tech, speculation, fundamentals and cite a buffett strategy.

I've found some success with RSI,MACD, bollinger and stochastics. Even things like cup and handle show merit. But you have to look at HOW they work. All of these can break down through manipulation. If I know you're watching a cup and handle, I have all the money in the world, and am intent on targeting you I can break the pattern on whatever I think you`re signalling on. I try to get in the head of the market maker and understand motive. There's always a bigger picture. The indicators are a microcosm into the macrocosm. Just one piece of the puzzle to successful trading in my opinion.

Low volume low price and 15 Reverse splits and your chart indicators break down. basically no chart indicator works here, few provide any incite of any worth and I`d suggest finding a stock over $5 with market maker influence if you want to attempt to play indicators. I could show you piles of cup and handles that did not have the expected effect. Over published ascending triangles with no break out. Why no break out? it's a shell game where the house wins. I suggest you study WHY they work and then you`ll realize why most of them are worthless here. Then read some Buffett, a wiki on fundamental analysis and a wiki on speculation. Right now it is my opinion, for your own benefit, it's important to understand that you're currently dangerously off base in your logic here.

Now the other day I was PO'd they updated their website with "developing SiNi implants" and argued the implantation of a hip in 2011 to suggest they're not doing squat, or I`m mad at the lack of progress. So what's the big hold up on dropping sini coatings on chrome cobalt or Sintered femoral heads. Within their own literature they suggest a hip would require a 2-3 year clinical study and a knee would require a 510K. I guess the 2-3 year study is a big hold up to just shut it all down it's not happening and dissolution of the company due to loss of capital is the major concern. That looks almost behind them.

Now interesting that the stars aligned on the FDA's new systems of clearance. Even more interesting is a media blitz over metallosis over the weekend before that was announced, noted on the Chief of the FDA's own twitter as having no effect on the FDA's decisions to change the system as they where planning it before hand.

Something else: I believe the terminology Sonny used was brazing. To develop it. Now this would make sense. They got Sintered and coated. The coated looks like a micro coating. You want a big thick layer like the H1 and you need a different method. Why a thick layer? on HA coatings it looks like the bone assimilates the HA coating then rejects the metal underneath, compromising the HA coatings bond that leads to loosening or poor osseo integration. The thicker the layer the more time is bought before full assimilation and subsequent rejection of the metal component. Luckily Silicon shows an affinity for bonding to Titanium according to my research. Not sure what happens when you add Nitride to the mix or if this is a sufficient bonding for the field. Looks like they've marked it as a key focus of development so they probably know more about this than I do at this point.

Now here's a litmus test for my tool box similar to Occam's razor: you're never going to have an original thought or original idea. Especially when we're dealing with good ideas. There's usually a 97% probability that any good idea you come up with is already developed or 10 people already thought about it. This usually applies. Hopefully this test can be applied to what I`m presenting here. That or I`m off my meds again. Especially if im equivalent to a guy that walked into a room and started running the mouth compared to an industry that's livelihoods and life's work pivot on the subject matter.

Look how is APPEARS that comment on playing to lose not win really hit home. Chrome cobalt on PEEK is a supposed 97% success rate at the 10 year mark. Sounds good. I doubt it, we're talking loosening, infection, plastic particulate, titanium embrittlement, dislocation but I`m not a boss so 97% sounds good.

But what if I`m right about cerasurf bending over biolox in a multi pronged attack? that would be a company playing to win absolutely wrecking shop on a company just playing not to lose like they have no competition.

The idea here is to create an implant that is the absolute best of possibilities, Not just looks good for profit margin, to shore up any room for a competitor to best you in the market.

Now back to focusing on this dual mobility concept design. Why does a titanium monoblock work for nano and micro? but then changes to a Chrome cobalt modular design? SIZE! the tinier balls work without fracturing from embrittlement of titanium because they're small balls. Big balls need a tougher material. So maybe SiNi coated chrome cobalt or replacing biolox delta ball designs isnt the end all be all and there's more development that could be done now that an extremely tough material is unlocked? Tougher material can mean bigger balls?

What if we took the SERF Novae, Silicon Nitride and H1 and put them all together. Start with the Novae. First step is the peek is OUT. Replace that with either pure sini or heavily coated Sini/Titanium, like the H1 with metal/ceramic. Either way. Really don't think there's risk of SiNi fracturing if you went full SiNi but w/e. Same with the ball and the rest of the implant. Just coat it all up with SiNi or pure sintered SiNi. Make it all out of chrome and you get metallosis. Make it all out of Titanium and it fractures from embrittlement. The potential for big balls is unlocked with SiNi. Looks unworkable without. The way its depicted with peek is asking for a ton of peek particulate.

Looks like you got me there. Interesting they retained their website and catalogue and are operating as a subsidiary of biomet under ZBH, vs. fully conglomerating under ZBH.

I`m not sure if I trust that site as it looks like it was written by a chinese AI, but

Looks like it's related to biomet but not a subsidiary of Zimmer?

Biomet 3i dental implant looks eerily similar. That's actually what Im on about today. Eary similarities. What's up with OSI? looks like they became a subsidiary of Omnilife.

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20110218/First-implantation-of-AmedicaUS-Spines-Infinia-silicon-nitride-ceramic-femoral-head-performed-in-hip-replacement.aspx

This one names both in article on the first implant of a silicon nitride hip. Decided to look at what OMNi is doing and found this gem:

http://www.omnils.com/healthcare-professionals/serf.cfm

The SERF Novae Inventors of Dual Mobility. Now that looks eerily similar in design to the progress the company that looks like it's being incorporated into zimmer on the 510K that looks like it's specifically referencing cerasurf, not biolox to me. Not a lawyer but this looks a bit TOO similar in trade dress, prior art, patent infringement. But when has that stopped anybody? the color pink lawsuit seems like a complete dichotomy. Is this indicating friendly relationships to move forward without consulting a lawyer? aka "strategic partnership"? Even has a cool name like SERF. why serf? Only reference to serf I know about is ceraserf. Is serf some medical terminology im unaware of?

Thats it. I`m opening up Zimner Boimet and seeing how much I can infringe to see if these guys got a lawyer anywhere. Next is Seracurf.

Trying to dig guys out over LLC's and plane sales led me back to Florida when I made this post. Really hark's back here uncovering DARPA and national labs. These guys are masters of OPSEC. Wonder how much Madg knew when he made that post.

I think I compared the FDA wording to prove it to myself in a recent post they're referencing a coorstek material. Time will prove one of correct here. Why would the shill company even use coorstek if this isnt the case?? EXACTLY substantially equivalent. The new Zimmer 510K says exactly the same not substantially equivalent. On another note my mistake incorrectly using ZTA as Aluminum oxide ceramics.

Pretty smart of coorstek if I`m right to offer the same product as your closest competition in ceramic medical material for cheaper then blow your own product out of the water. Would set coorstek up to dominate. Can't prove it but the infringement lawsuits on biolox? is that a prong in this multi pronged attack? Been awhile since I mentioned that so here's a reminder taste.

http://knobbemedical.com/lawsuit-alerts_km/ceramedic-llc-v-depuy-orthopaedics-new-lawsuit-filed/

Thought I linked That company based out of warsaw and used as a predicate for the 510K for EXACT MATERIAL to a brazilian ceramic using cerasurf.

Timeline makes sense:

New zimmer 510k is filed and... PEW!

https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/coorstek-medical-jobs-logan-ut

Looks like they're hiring..for ramping? Why are they not testing Cerasurf over biolox or leveraging Ashok's ZTA patents to create a strengthened version of Aluminum oxide ceramic?? I think they know about Ashok somehow. Logan is 66 miles from salt lake city. Top that with Coorstek headquarters in Fort worth down the street from CTL. Too many coincidences here. Also fits with Occam's razor that Zimmer isn't about to enter the world of medical ceramic production rather develop a new strategic partnership, given that major fact you dropped with the Zimmer 510K. Could be wrong here but I would put money on it at this point based on the odds the hidden facts are showing.

I didn't. I started looking at it because it's an all ceramic, Ceramic on ceramic, dependent on "superior osseointegration". The design looks tailor fit for SiNi over the current ZTA. Think I started sniffing it out as an attempt at an answer to metallosis lawsuits that where disallowed over there. Depending on the current involvement "conspiracy" I was hoping it was a design stage of launching the SINI material, and was hoping to get insight into who might be interested and track down a potential "strategic partner" and name names based on a hunch.

I think I connected it to Depuy, based on Some CEO's previous sale of his company into depuy and what looked like joint research into it by J&J and GE healthcare based on an article on the tech and who was currently developing that. Such as 3d printed custom surgical tools.

Great link to DARPA. Definitely makes sense J&J, GE and coorstek are playing at this level of DOE/national lab/ Gov funded. Pretty obvious this a national lab pet project at this point of paying attention. Considering ceramatec, and how that played out. I think they choose Coorstek as a strategic partner over Ceramtec. Really hoping this is about laying ground work to initiate SiNi, and not about the ZTA. Considering the development by Ashok was to find a strengthened version of ZTA then about facing and flying down the SiNi rabbit hole to find increased osseointegration, antibacterial ALONG with increased strength over ZTA I`m willing to bet this is where its headed.

BritainMaybe he can ask for a loicense to sue for damages M8? remember no Loicense has been issued to seek damages on metallosis there. Struck down. At least it was "free". In the sense they paid for it :(

So makes sense why the FDA changes the rules to suit National Lab requirements since FDA is also gov. run. BUT when the Gov. Tries to do something nice to push forward the research into real world consequences the "public sector" gives this kind of push back? Dont bite the hand that feeds you. Instead of depending on the civil sector to sort out metallosis, given the score, I say the Gov. slaps them down with the whole hand of god from the regulatory sector. Show me the man and I`ll show you the crime. Not going political here. Not the place. But I think it's an interesting political climate to slap stuff like this instead of pandering to it and put it in it's place.

Is this the new hustle? IPO national lab studies? Reverse split the stock and write it all off on your taxes? Injecting every dime of taxes you owe into national lab research? Was I supposed to be writing this off on my taxes? Sometimes I wish Sonny would take questions to explain things like this. Sometimes I wish I had a smart dad that taught me things, instead of blindly stumbling in the dark learning things the hard way. I`m stupid. It's hard to learn on my own.

Alright back down the rabbit hole here.

So I guess AMEDICA has the capability of coatings since I doubt theyre lying to the SEC. Just none of it is on an actual product. Why where they not coating US spine screws and just letting their equipment sit there and rot? No clue. But I thought about digging into WHO is funding research into coatings to try and get to the bottom of who is interested. Maybe we can find this strategic partner.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199908)46:2%3C262::AID-JBM16%3E3.0.CO;2-1

The big one that sticks out here is Othon Monteiro from Plasma Applications Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Who else is listed here as FUNDING THIS??

Who funds Berkeley National Lab? the DOE! you might remember them from such films as Ceramatec.

We'll use this as an example:Flexbone, notice the .gov?:

https://ipo.lbl.gov/lbnl2104/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19350632

Looks like it was developed in a national lab and kicked down to Department of Orthopedics, University of Massachusetts Medical School for testing. But who funded that? Looks like a bunch of Research support and grants from NIH. Unfortunately this looks about where the trail stops cold. No huge line of products by major corporations developing anything using the IP of Flexbone.

So I kind of doubt there's a secret shadow team of researchers developing along side Amedica (Now heres where the doubt kicks in)
that amedica pays for. Looks like the government pays them in the best interest of health or something according to Berkeley National labs own mission statement. Tax money well spent IMO. These tax dodging megacorps I consider an enemy. Dumb as the day is long also.

In a perfect world, if we're ready to adopt reality, I'd be headed to canada right now to break in and find out how much of that factory is sputtering equipment. Considering SINT could absorb SOME and coorstek could absorb sintering we'd need kyocera to focus on deposition coating every inch of the U.S. or at least all our medical equipment. We're talking pins screws bone plates, surgical drill bodies, operating tables..everything.

..And if CTL is incorporated into stryker? that wouldn't effect the supply chain? all hypothetical here based on the puzzle pieces. I`m presenting none of this as fact to maintain fluidity. The Zimmer 510K filing seems to be the soup du jour on these coorstek arguments.

Also coorstek seems to be advertising their SiNi sintering ability but it looks like Kyocera seems to be more adept at High Power Impulse Magnetron Sputter deposition. Considering the hip study was in Japan and this wasnt funded by Zimmer..I dont see kyocera making a bid for acquisition of Ceramtec. I also see Coorstek running with cerasurf. all indications of coorstek are conspiratorial. Links to Kyocera are published factual. I don't think SINT is scaled to absorb widely adopted production runs; neither Zimmer for that matter. I mean good luck to zimmer(not really) I just dont seem them as a critical component in this.

Ok I used the master list of logical fallacies wrong presenting your argument as an appeal to majority. That's actually an appeal to popularity not majority rule so your argument doesnt apply to a logical fallacy only mine. Still doesn't explain my rambling links to stryker or the how zimmer is connected to kyocera based on the way you`re looking at this.

One of the arguments for how coorstek would be able to out compete ceramtec from 2011 was US manufacturer stream lining sourcing. This relates to the geolocation positioning arguments ive presented between Dallas Salt lake city and Colorado that led me on the coorstek crazy train in the first place.

Coorstek and Kyocera are easily linked.

In the other scenario Zimmer would be attempting to become a ceramics manufacturer.

For the record I`m just digging around patents, IP and indeed accounts to fit into broader correlations. The bears seem to have been petty and malicious in this manner of public info. to generate fear or harm. At this point I would have them all arrested for cyber stalking. Deal with that thought or w/e.

I`m just an ashok fanboy at this point. He pops up as involved in SINT then mysteriously disappears. There's some OPSEC going down around this, hypothetically to prevent me doxxing? or maybe im just schizophrenic.

I`ll raise you the logical fallacy of appeal to majority with a logical fallacy of appeal to authority. Ashok is the final boss.

Wait is CTL a supposed shill for Zimmer or Stryker? I forget between CTL and Osseus who may be shilling for who sometimes.

Andy Choi

Chief Business Development Officer
CTL Medical

Business Director, Chief Engineer - Spine and Orthopedics
Stryker

He also led the asset sale of a spinal fusion device to Stryker, which achieved a 10x return in less than a year from concept to commercialization. (vertiflex?)

Bonus round:

R&D Engineer
Space Systems Loral

But hey, just because he spent over 60% of his career operating in the best interest of stryker doesnt make him a "stryker shill". Zimmer or stryker? Only makes sense either looking at SINT as a material manufacturer similar to Ceramtec or Coorstek.

take Choi for instance:
BS, Mechanical Engineering not material engineering. Suggests a better fit in medical device engineering rather than device material engineering. Sonny seems qualified to at least sit at the round table of both.

Sonny mentioned something to this effect that one time we could get him on the phone. Companies wanted one or the other but not both..Should have asked for a power point presentation on that factoid. If he was accepting questions at open mic night at amedica.

IF you examine this from a perspective of all small companies are shills for large companies and AMDA may be a shill for coorstek, then CTL may be a shill for stryker. I can find no evidence Styker is being converted to cerasurf.

https://spinalnewsinternational.com/stryker-recalls-tritanium-posterior-lumbar-cage/

But wait where we not seeing stock price movement in 2018 on this spinal front?? ceramic shatters not metals.. abloo bloo.

imbrittle..ment

I`m no fan of ZTA either. I was using H1 as an example of Ceramic on Ceramic still in development phases. Not scrapped for squeaking. H1 would be alot cooler in SiNi.

https://www.9news.com.au/2018/11/30/19/59/hip-surgery-ceramic-osteoarthritis-treatment

Recerf by matortho looks alot like H1. CEO of matortho sold his last company to Depuy.

depuy uses biolox.

So who uses coorstek cerasurf?

The only company I can come up with is ICONACY. that company on examination looks like a hot bed for Zimmer. Zimmer only moving forward on iconacy after the color pink lawsuit was settled. I`m going to remind again Ceramatec is a subsidiary of coorstek. The timeline on the SiNi hip hold up almost matches perfectly to the color pink issues. But doesnt Zimmer use Biolox not Coorstek? considering the color pink may have been a hold up should they sue over the "material matter" trade dress? ceramatec, color pink, material matters it's like theyre instigating one another. Can coorstek convert depuy? Is this all BS and coorstek has no interest in SiNi? Can we safely say at this point Zimmer has interest in Coorstek? This gets more and more convoluted the more you dig.

I'd expect a higher prevalence if this where an issue with Ceramic on ceramic, but we've been over this.



https://www.healio.com/orthopedics/hip/news/print/orthopedics-today/%7B54cbe0bd-0d86-4e05-8211-199585515ff3%7D/the-squeaking-hip-is-a-multifactorial-concern

We don't have a material problem we have a personnel problem. You get the same stripe wear from poor positioning with the PEEK liner except the stripe wear is inside the plastic cup and the issue is only silenced. The problems are increased plastic particulate and eventual plastic cup failure. Wasn't one of the articles posted of a guy that died of metallosis initially a failure of the PEEK liner that led to wear of the underlying materials?

due to mohs hardness peek produces the highest amount of wear particulate. One of the major advantages of SiNi femoral heads , I feel, is it's low production of wear particulate and that particulates resorbability. Throw in PEEK liner and SiNi loses it's edge here. H1 is being developed as ceramic on ceramic along side development of 3d surgical positioning so there has to be some truth here about the 8 year hold up is not about accidentally forgetting the PEEK liner. Definitely sounds like a bright idea move from the usual suspects to try to revise in a PEEK liner here.

2011 to 2019 to update the website and drop that "in development" AGAIN without a single update on development is a serious undeniable hold the phone moment. Possibly a catch 22 situation considering not saying anything isn't a solid improvement.(EDIT) forgot about the Zimmer PEEK liner update.

I think we're on the same page on titanium then. Still glad I broke it down to at least understand potentially why that stem failed and a potential underlying benefit of embrittlement inhibitor to SiNi coatings on titanium beyond antibacterial, osseo integration and foreign body response inhibitor .

"bioinert CrN/NbN coatings"

Sounds about right for Zimmer. I can find evidence of Zimmer funding research into this coating but not SiNi.

Hmm, I wonder why they switched to a modular design utilizing a chrome cobalt head over a Titanium head, unlike the biomedtrix monoblock system in micro and nano hip implants. Why did the manufacturer want a stem that snapped in half back to "analyze"? Pretty obvious what the issue was if you ask me.





These two quotes sound like a dichotomy to me. Replace Silica in bone and you get brittle bones. Where do you think the main area of bio accumulation may be? Let me throw a guess. The area of direct contact? the area we're seeing an affinity for osseointegration of titanium? I would warranty that osseo integration until I get my truck out of your drive way. I`m going to coin a new term for this: PSEUDO osseointegration unlike TRUE osseintegration. The difference being mostly defined by The body encapsulating the implant vs. fully assimilating it. This may be the reason why we're seeing revision surgery for titanium implants loosening ALL DAY SON. While SiNi seems to have a spotless track record.

However are we playing to win here of just get my truck out of your driveway and avoid a lawsuit? There's plenty of low hanging fruit involving metallosis and Biolox delta fracture to have to try and prove titanium fracture or loosening as inherent flaws by the manufacturers right now.


I think you`re barking up the wrong tree here, although:

and

However

I think it's like 90% is easily eliminated as waste in the body. The rest can go to weakening bone structure or whatever. I dont think they care. You might get it labeled in California but I don't think it will gain recognition as a growing concern in the medical industry.

----------

Ok get ready bears I'm about to bad mouth this SINTX and give them my what for(guaranteed you didnt get this far and TLDR'd out of here long ago).



NO YOU ARE NOT. The implants are developed They`re sitting on Sonny's desk since the ice ages. This is some BS. Considering what we're seeing is a femoral head and what appears to be a titanium knee with SiNi coating this all seems to be well thought out. Why are we not seeing a SiNi knee or SiNi femoral stem? What else needs to be DEVELOPED before anything is actually launched? A Sini coated femoral stem? A SiNi coated femoral head? A SiNi doped HA coating?



https://www.todaysmedicaldevelopments.com/article/medical-device-design-manufacturing-amedica-us-spine-reconstructive-market-022111/

Where is the CEO escorted out of the building? I cant find the link with him discussing launching hips in Europe within the next year from 2014. When we're discussing implanting the device in 2011 and it's now 2019 and we're discussing development?? This seems like reversion rather than progression. Is this intentional? We don't know since Sonny hasn't addressed this little tidbit and refuses to take questions for obvious reasons. Not suggesting the guy is engaging intentionally in sabotage. I dont think so. Is SINT hitting milestones? are they making progress that demonstrates due diligence? Is buying US spine and essentially running their products off the map acceptable performance as a company?

Let's take this rocket ship straight to crazy town. How does Ashok relate to Bob Lazar? What Ashok details in his patent on radiation shielding based on heavy elements. Would this benefit from finding a stable isotope on the supposed island of stability? I mean it's heavier but would it require less weight to achieve the same amount of radiation shielding compared to lead?

We study elements but some of the major game changers have been combinations of these elements. For instance Bronze, Silicon Nitride, water. The possibility in combinations are almost endless. A better understanding is what I'd expect from a type 3 civilization. For instance a metallic alloy of natrium and calcium just for fun. oxidization should be reconsidered as oxygen + time. stability of these large atoms and elements easily oxidized is relative to time considering time dilation.

This whole thing is convoluted. Are we arguing the "research team" is paying Amedica or Amedica is paying the research team at this point?

Perhaps Im naive. I think it's suggested the victim that should be concerned is the investor. Who gifted Rahaman a Robocaster? Where did they get that money? We should track that and determine who is aggrieved. Where do you even apply focus? Alot of this seems to rely on suppositions that are being presented as facts. Possibly well hidden under the privacy of an LLC

http://web.mst.edu/~rahaman/

These guys seem to love to post on their CV. They wouldn't miss out on the notch on their belt. I am presenting this supposition as a fact.







Ohh, this is better than Sonny's CV for digging purposes.

Direct your attention to Patents and IP. It looks like nothing protects him from angiogenesis of bioglass with Soft tissue when this seems to be related to his research. Unless the manufacturers of Rediheal are a shill company. You will find a dead end on that when you attempt to research ownership. However, some of his patents and IP suggest he may be owed Licensing and rights in orthopedics from a cursory glance. Bal seems to be included in some of this IP. It appears some of the IP lays groundwork for obvious changes in design to reap royalties.

Now look at Graduate Students Advised. LOL this guy..I`m not even going to say it and I could care less.

Since the advent of the internet should be honing your BS meter as a tool to be here. It's always been a great exercise in critical thinking that should be honing your abilities. I think around the time of the mass adoption of smart phones that allow internet access and the corporate take over of the internet something changed. A shift to intentional BS from either people payed to post or AI bots. I can see a future where the majority of people you may encounter over the internet may shift to not actual people at all. Where the internet becomes a place to engage with AI bots disguised as human. A computer virus of the mind. Designed to inject ideas and opinions into your organic opinion while drowning out dissenting ideas from organic brains. Taking advantage of all the logical fallacies but mainly synthetic Argumentum ad populum. I've already noted examples of real life attempts toward this goal in advertising and politics over the internet.

How does this relate? well the idea of one retail investor cheer leading a stock is seen as rediculous. of absolute irrelevancy and should carry no weight in the grand scheme of so many retail investors and market makers carrying the bulk of the weight and ignoring the "noise". However there is an aspect within the stock market of bilking the retail investor. When you can harness a bot army of artificial opinion you can take advantage of a synergistic relation to lay a trap of the majority argument.

Haven't really heard this attempted to be expressed anywhere as a warning of the dangers of AI or mind control. I consider this definitely on topic. As an investor realizing this and applying it would only strengthen your skills and can be applied to the technical indicator of RSI swings. I've already attempted to apply this with almost complete success. Really takes all the bite out of it when you accept it as fact.

whatever it is you're considering I find it so negligible it's not worth considering. Even if what you`re saying has weight, which I refuse to allow it free rent in my mind. The fact is Sonny nor SINT is no one of importance political enemy. I view it not as a legitimate concern, rather a take down effort. An angle of attack.

https://www.americanelements.com/silicon-nitride-nanoparticles-12033-89-5

Anyone willing to provide an alternative theory on a material for "nanosurfacing"? Im all ears people. Seriously. Shoot.

American Elements. Its research and production facilities are located in Salt Lake City..etc.

https://www.americanelements.com/research-and-development.html

Did Ashok's patent mention tantalum? I forget. does it really matter?
Seems like when guys need an answer it doesnt really matter where it comes from. They become very open to suggestions. The more the merrier. Perhaps one of them is thinking outside the box. Each coming from a unique back ground and perspective. As long as the problem is solved the quicker the better who cares where the solution came from?

Fort Worth, TX, USA

http://www.coorstekmedical.com/News/TabId/111/PostId/18/eurocoating-spa-acquires-nanosurfaces-industries-srl-the-coorstek-medical-italian-manufacturing-division.aspx





That could be an unforeseen set back. I mean everybody hold their breath and wait for the courts to decide whether Biolox owns the color pink.



I`m not saying what I`m suggesting is fact but it sure does smell funny. Connect all the dots and there's enough smell here to safely declare this a stench.

https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf18/K181761.pdf

Hmm, digging a bit into Iconacy they look to be based in Warsaw and operating out of Brazil. The devices seem to be an advancement in design.



https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf15/K151307.pdf

Interesting the I-hip uses biolox delta as the substantially equivalent device. and the FDA distinguish this as The subject device is made of a similar material

--------

Now obviously Iconacy being based out of Warsaw marketing these devices in Brazil and the way the Zimmer 510K is worded is an indicator on this relationship. If AMDA was always a straight shill for Zimmer then why are they not located in Indiana like Iconacy? Who bought Ceramatec? Still operating out of Salt Lake city, Dallas metroplex and Colorado? You dont sell a thriving company. Biolox was sold off. I mean why even incorporate her into kyocera ceramics or coorstek? the equipment? the infrastructure? I guess. Tech sounds like she's a dead fish that died on the hill of the "color pink" trademark. I dont think she chose that hill to die on either.

I agree last doctor I met hadn't had a day off in 6 months and I was wondering his state of sleep deprivation. Definitely not firing on all four. Just kind of going through the motions. Honestly, I argued with him about his diagnosis of pneumonia and why I thought it was instead chronic emphysema and possibly pulmonary fibrosis based on several factors and he acted like I was wasting his time. 3 months later, being a specialist he diagnosed emphysema and pulmonary fibrosis like it was never brought up. Seriously doubt they're bringing out extensive metal testing without making it AI standardized SOP. Also the cost factor. I know I dont want to see it on a bill. Especially with these guys out to bilk federally funded healthcare with exorbitant pricing. Some days I just want to watch it all burn.