InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 798
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/27/2018

Re: None

Tuesday, 01/29/2019 1:23:57 PM

Tuesday, January 29, 2019 1:23:57 PM

Post# of 41257
Now back to focusing on this dual mobility concept design. Why does a titanium monoblock work for nano and micro? but then changes to a Chrome cobalt modular design? SIZE! the tinier balls work without fracturing from embrittlement of titanium because they're small balls. Big balls need a tougher material. So maybe SiNi coated chrome cobalt or replacing biolox delta ball designs isnt the end all be all and there's more development that could be done now that an extremely tough material is unlocked? Tougher material can mean bigger balls?

What if we took the SERF Novae, Silicon Nitride and H1 and put them all together. Start with the Novae. First step is the peek is OUT. Replace that with either pure sini or heavily coated Sini/Titanium, like the H1 with metal/ceramic. Either way. Really don't think there's risk of SiNi fracturing if you went full SiNi but w/e. Same with the ball and the rest of the implant. Just coat it all up with SiNi or pure sintered SiNi. Make it all out of chrome and you get metallosis. Make it all out of Titanium and it fractures from embrittlement. The potential for big balls is unlocked with SiNi. Looks unworkable without. The way its depicted with peek is asking for a ton of peek particulate.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SINT News