Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sharp has brain-washed his cult members into believing that all GOFF/WNFT problems are because of Calasse.
One little lawsuit and Sharp folds up like a cheap suit - and Sharp was constantly crying and whining about Calasse - Sharp is always acting like a child - he is too sensitive and insecure to be a competent CEO.
It is hilarious that a few believes everything Sharp tells them to think.
Learn to think on your own - you are going to keep losing money from getting married to these scams.
IG
The judge didn't write that, or conclude that. Sharp's attorney did, and the opposing attorney didn't rebut it in any way.
Yeah, you've gotten good at copying that excerpt over and over, while completely ignoring the context.
The judge didn't write that, or conclude that. Sharp's attorney did, and the opposing attorney didn't rebut it in any way.
Which makes it meaningless. But we digress, none of this matters because the decision will be made over jurisdictional defects, it won't even get into the fraud allegation.
Sorry if your over-inflated ego makes you think that I'm at your beck and call. I asure you, I am not.
And you can make as many unfounded conclusions as you want. They simply aren't true.
These are the facts from the district court...
https://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/document/view.do?csNameID=64060&csIID=64060&deLinkID=909774&onBaseDocumentNumber=23-23834
the district court found that Appellant’s “only service was to
aid and abet securities fraud” and therefore cancelled Appellant’s Stock.
Okay. For whatever reason, the SEC, after describing in detail Calasse's fraudulent publications concerning the "diamond" and "gold" mines and fraudulent press releases, decided not to persue him. It doesn't negate the finding, from what was presented as evidence from the SEC (submitted at both the District and Supreme Courts) - by the District Court that Calasse "aided and abetted securities fraud."
Interesting that you'll launch into a multi-page pedantic post over nothing, yet conveniently ignore 2/3 of my post and don't even bother disputing it.
I will chalk it up as proof that clearly shows that you know you're wrong.
The SEC routinely brings actions against people outside the United States. They’re a civil enforcement agency so they only need to serve a defendant with a Summons and Complaint to obtain jurisdiction over the defendant the same as any other civil plaintiff.
The SEC routinely brings actions against people outside the United States. They’re a civil enforcement agency so they only need to serve a defendant with a Summons and Complaint to obtain jurisdiction over the defendant the same as any other civil plaintiff.
The point being made is that the SEC "appeared to take the position that Calasse didn't commit fraud and was duped or conned." That conclusion is reached by virtue of the SEC:
A) never charging him with anything, despite charging four other defendants, and
Again, I consider this a case where he should have used a better word ("shows" or "demonstrates" instead of "states"),
...which is a lie because the SEC never said such q thing. That was a lie which you just made up.
you don't seem to be able connect the dots.
Response: We have revised our disclosure to treat the Series A preferred issued to Warwick Calasse as issued and outstanding and to make clear that Mr. Sharp has retained control of Goff Corp. through the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of Series A preferred and 1,000,000 shares of common stock.
The SEC's actions clearly states that they took the position that Calasse didn't commit fraud and was duped or conned when he was given the CEO position.
Then Calasse just blames his previous lawyer for his horrendous representation and supposed "abandonment" which was not true. The district court decided that Calasse was not abandoned by his lawyer. Courts don't have "do overs" because of hiring crappy lawyers.
the fact that the lower court found that Calasse did "aid and abet securities fraud" is significan't in this case.
I'm so glad that the detailed SEC description of the aiding and abetting fraud that Calasse comitted as CEO of GOFF was allowed to be presented as evidence again as it was in the lower court case.
Calasse's lawyer side-steps the SEC description of Calasse's aiding and abetting fraud completely and is arguing that all that happened was a simple breach of contract and ran with that false assertion throughout the brief which is a joke.
Then Calasse just blames his previous lawyer for his horrendous representation and supposed "abandonment" which was not true. The district court decided that Calasse was not abandoned by his lawyer. Courts don't have "do overs" because of hiring crappy lawyers.
...but the aiding and abetting securities fraud that the lower court found Calasse perpetrated is significan't in this case.
https://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/document/view.do?csNameID=64060&csIID=64060&deLinkID=909774&onBaseDocumentNumber=23-23834
the district court found that Appellant’s “only service was to
aid and abet securities fraud” and therefore cancelled Appellant’s Stock.
The district court’s decision was clearly erroneous because the district court accepted the conjecture and speculation presented by Respondent as proof of “actual fraud.”
The district court ruled that the Corporation did not “receive any value” for Appellant’s 50 million common shares and 5 million preferred shares.
in spite of the clear dereliction of duties by Appellant’s former counsel – the district court stated that because Appellant “was represented by counsel at the time of the February 9, 2022 hearing on the motion to cancel his shares in Goff Corp … he was not effectively abandoned by his counsel and cannot avail himself of either NRCP
60(b)(1) or NRCP 60(b)(6) relief.” II AA 269.
57. On March 5, 2013 i.e., two months after the initial transfer of Goff stock to
Caledonian, Clear Water and Legacy Global- Goff filed a Report on Form 8-K announcing a
change-of-control transaction in which an individual by the name of Warwick Calasse bought all of the stock owned by officers o·Flynn and Corkery for $25,000. O'Flynn and Corkery resigned, and Calasse was appointed in their stead. Calasse was supposedly qualified to be sole officer and director of Goff because, among other things, "[f]rom 2006 to 2010, Mr. Calasse held vairous training and management positions with horse farms and stables in the United Kingdom and Zimbabwe." Goff's corporate headquarters moved from Cork, Ireland to Medellin, Colombia. During the tenure of O'Flynn and Corkery, Goff's filings with the Commission did not evidence any activity, operations or transactions in the job placement ( or any other) business.
58. The next week, on March 12, 2013, Goff filed a Reporimt on Form 8-K announcing a
significant change in business: the company's newly created Nevada shell corporation, Golden Glory Resources Inc. ("Golden Glory Nevada") had entered into an Assignment Agreement with Golden Glory Resources S.A., a Panamanian corporation ("Golden Glory Panama"), by which Golden Glory Nevada "acquired an option to purchase a 100% interest in and to a certain Columbian mining concession known as La Frontera (The Frontier) Project, code number LGC-
15011, located in the Aquales region, Cal des Department, Republic of Colombia." The Report Fonn 8-K represented that "we have abandoned our former business plan and entered the business of mineral exploration and are now an exploration stage mining company engaged in the identification, acquisition and exploitation of metals and minerals with a focus on gold and diamond mineralization on La Frontera Property."
59. Beginning three days after its change of business, Goff issued a series of press
releases creating the public impression that it was immediately and actively engaged in gold and diamond exploration in Colombia. For example:
• On March 15, 2013, a Goff press release, entitled "Goff Corp. Subsidiary Golden
Glory Resources Acquires 100 Percent Interest in the La Frontera Gold Project in
Colombia's Hottest Gold Exploration Region," represented that "[a]pproximately two-thirds of Colombian gold production has been from placer deposits in the Department of Antioquia, which is immediacy [sic] adjacent to and straddles about 30% of the leases where Golden Glory's La Frontera Project is located." Goff stated that "this project is seen to be on the order of six times as large as notable prospects with similar gold type and potential."
• On March 18, 2013, Goff issued a press release entitled "Goff Corporation Has
Appointed Experienced Colombian Mining and Explosives Expert Manuel Hernando Serna as a Director of the Board."
• On March 22, 2013, Goff announced that "Golden Glory Resources expects to pursue its exploration program that will employ leading geological consultants and their own geological staff to carry out the program .... This first phase exploration is anticipated within 90 days." On March 25, 2013, Goff represented that Golden Glory Resources "plans to begin a 5,000-rneter diamond drilling program on its La Frontera Gold Project in Department of Caldes, Colombia within 90 days .. ,
• In a press_release on March 26, 2013, Goff's sole officer and director, Calasse,
stated that"he expects gold's current price level will help fuel the company's
efforts to target a bulk tonnage, low-grade type gold and silver project on Golden
Glory's leases, and that the time is right for gold in Columbia." Calasse further
stated that "[w]e will be the first [on the Project] to explore using the full range of
modem gold and silver discovery methods."
• On March 27, 2013, Goff related that "Golden Glory Resources is developing a
comprehensive exploration program for its La Frontera Gold Project in Colombia; Phase One groundwork will provide basis for follow-on planned diamond drilling."
60. Bolstering the Goff press releases was a newsletter posted on April 2, 2013 on a
stock-touting website by the name of Penny Stock Pillager, which stated: "After years of tunnoil, the Colombian government is stepping in to help legitimate mining companies pull gold from their resource-rich soil. By grabbing a plot of land directly in the Colombian gold sector, investors in Goff Corporation could be on the verge of true wealth!" (emphasis original)
61. The representations of Goff and Penny Stock Pillager were never supported by
audited financial statements evidencing true wealth, gold mining interests, or diamond drilling.
On or before March 18, 2013, Goff was required to filed a "super" Report on Form 8-K that included all of the information required in a Report on Form 10. The company did not file such a Report on Fonn 8-K on March 18 or any time thereafter. Goff stopped filing Reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q at all times after March 18, 2013.
62. There is no trading data available for Goff on March 14, 2013, the day before the
company's March 15 press release announcing its mining interest in "Colombia's hottest gold exploration region." On March 18, the first trading day after the release, Goff stock spiked to a closing price of $0.28 per share on a volume of 263,914,096 shares. On April 5, Goff stock at a high of$0.58 per share on a volume of:22,003,500 shares. By June 4, 2013, Goff stock had fallen to a price of $0.01 per share.
63. Simultaneously with the Goff stock promotion, Caledonian, Clear Water, Legacy
Global and Verdrnont sold the stock into the public markets. Theirs were the first sales of the stock to the public. Caledonian Bank sold 35,000,000 shares of Goff stock for proceeds of $6,860,685; Clear Water sold 25,000,000 shares for proceeds of $4,226,689; Legacy Global sold 21,750,000 shares for proceeds of$3,293,816; and Verdmont sold 14,000,000 shares for of $3,526,354. Verdmont sold for the account of customers and received commissions on the sales. Caledonian Bank and Caledonian Securities have represented through counsel that sold for the account of customers and received commissions on the sales.
64. These sales of 95,750,000 shares of Goff stock generated proceeds of $17,907,546.
In making these distributions, the Defendants violated Section 5 of the Securities Act. There was no registration statement in effect for the Defendants' offers and sales of Goff securities. And 1hr, Defendants used the instruments and means of interstate commerce in offering and selling Goff securities.
61. The representations of Goff and Penny Stock Pillager were never supported by
audited financial statements evidencing true wealth, gold mining interests, or diamond drilling. On or before March 18, 2013, Goff was required to filed a "super" Report on Form 8-K that included all of the information required in a Report on Form 10. The company did not file such a Report on Fonn 8-K on March 18 or any time thereafter. Goff stopped filing Reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q at all times after March 18, 2013.
62.
I suugest you need a brain scan Stat because I have proven many times as well as Yolo but you are so married to WNFT/Sharp - you don't seem to be able connect the dots.
you don't seem to be able connect the dots.
"Frauds helping out fellow frauds."
I meant Yolo helping you with your nonsensical posts and vice versa.
I suugest you need a brain scan Stat because I have proven many times as well as Yolo but you are so married to WNFT/Sharp - you don't seem to be able connect the dots. When doing real DD you must be able to do abstract thinking and you are operating at a concrete operational thinking with Zero ability to abstract.
Here is where the SEC made Sharp return the stock to Calasse after Sharp attempted to steal the stock.
Because the facts show that the SEC never accused Calasse of fraud by the SEC - they never filed a complaint against Calasse.
If the SEC knew that Calasse had committed securities fraud - why did they make Sharp return the stock attempted to steal?
What is your excuse for the SEC not filing a complaint against Calasse?
Sharp's response to the SEC comments about the Form 10.
"We note your disclosure with regard to the treatment of shares held by Warwick Calasse as treasury shares Please provide your analysis as to why these shares should not be treated as issued and outstanding.
Response: We have revised our disclosure to treat the Series A preferred issued to Warwick Calasse as issued and outstanding and to make clear that Mr. Sharp has retained control of Goff Corp. through the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of Series A preferred and 1,000,000 shares of common stock.
Sharp failed in his attempt to steal the Calasse stock.
If the SEC thought that Calasse obtained the stock fraudulently they wouldn't have made Sharp return the stock to Calasse.
Then you posted your typical nonsense:
"I challenged you to post documentation proving this and you couldn't."
I did post the documentation to show - "The SEC's actions clearly states that they took the position that Calasse didn't commit fraud and was duped or conned when he was given the CEO position."
This is exactly like what happened in the CYNK pump and dump - a 19 year old boat captain was the puppet CEO - there was documents signed by the insiders using the puppet CEO's name.
3 of the insiders ended up in prison but the boat captain didn't get indicted - just as Calasse didn't get indicted. The SEC knew that Calasse was used as a puppet CEO - ergo Calasse wasn't charged with fraud.
Post your DD to prove that the SEC charged Calasse with fraud.
There is copious information I provided and proven the SEC never thought or charged Calasse with fraud.
Plus, I never stated that the DOJ was coming after you but the SEC goes after big time pumpers - you are just another knucklehead OTC pumper that never moves the needle.
This is exactly why I stated that you operated at a concrete operational level without any ability to abstract - when you post nonsense like the following:
"Where does it "clearly state" that the SEC stated that Calasse didn't commit securities fraud and that he was "duped" or "conned?" You can't produce that documentation because it's a lie."
Jesus H Christ - are you really that dumb that you expect a link etc.
Read the complaint - if the SEC thought Calasse was involved in the fraud he would have been named in a complaint.
Why don't you provide the complaint the SEC filed against Calasse - everyone knows that will never happen because the SEC understands that Calasse was a puppet CEO and had been duped by the insiders.
I posted the proof - but I doubt you can understand it.
IG
The DOJ won't be interested in you because the price has been in a death spiral - your pumping is weak and ineffective.
SEC takes the stance that the OTC is just knuckleheads screwing over other knuckleheads. The SEC wouldn't be interested in your pumping nonsense.
You posted:
"Frauds helping out fellow frauds."
That is absolutely true Sharp has 4 fraudulent shells and his minions like yourself do what can only be called childish pumping. And whining and crying about what you call bashers.
Odd there has never been a SEC filed a complaint against what you call a basher but many pumpers have been sanctioned or face criminal charges.
IG
It’s not surprising that they didn’t know how/when to sell. I was in his discord, they’re nuts!
The SEC's actions clearly states that they took the position that Calasse didn't commit fraud and was duped or conned when he was given the CEO position.
the district court found that Appellant’s “only service was to aid and abet securities fraud” and therefore cancelled Appellant’s Stock.
The district court’s decision was clearly erroneous because the district court accepted the conjecture and speculation presented by Respondent as proof of “actual fraud.”
The district court ruled that the Corporation did not “receive any value” for Appellant’s 50 million common shares and 5 million preferred shares.
in spite of the clear dereliction of duties by Appellant’s former counsel – the district court stated that because Appellant “was represented by counsel at the time of the February 9, 2022 hearing on the motion to cancel his shares in Goff Corp … he was not effectively abandoned by his counsel and cannot avail himself of either NRCP
60(b)(1) or NRCP 60(b)(6) relief.” II AA 269.
57. On March 5, 2013 i.e., two months after the initial transfer of Goff stock to
Caledonian, Clear Water and Legacy Global- Goff filed a Report on Form 8-K announcing a
change-of-control transaction in which an individual by the name of Warwick Calasse bought all of the stock owned by officers o·Flynn and Corkery for $25,000. O'Flynn and Corkery resigned, and Calasse was appointed in their stead. Calasse was supposedly qualified to be sole officer and director of Goff because, among other things, "[f]rom 2006 to 2010, Mr. Calasse held vairous training and management positions with horse farms and stables in the United Kingdom and Zimbabwe." Goff's corporate headquarters moved from Cork, Ireland to Medellin, Colombia. During the tenure of O'Flynn and Corkery, Goff's filings with the Commission did not evidence any activity, operations or transactions in the job placement ( or any other) business.
58. The next week, on March 12, 2013, Goff filed a Reporimt on Form 8-K announcing a
significant change in business: the company's newly created Nevada shell corporation, Golden Glory Resources Inc. ("Golden Glory Nevada") had entered into an Assignment Agreement with Golden Glory Resources S.A., a Panamanian corporation ("Golden Glory Panama"), by which Golden Glory Nevada "acquired an option to purchase a 100% interest in and to a certain Columbian mining concession known as La Frontera (The Frontier) Project, code number LGC-
15011, located in the Aquales region, Cal des Department, Republic of Colombia." The Report Fonn 8-K represented that "we have abandoned our former business plan and entered the business of mineral exploration and are now an exploration stage mining company engaged in the identification, acquisition and exploitation of metals and minerals with a focus on gold and diamond mineralization on La Frontera Property."
59. Beginning three days after its change of business, Goff issued a series of press
releases creating the public impression that it was immediately and actively engaged in gold and diamond exploration in Colombia. For example:
• On March 15, 2013, a Goff press release, entitled "Goff Corp. Subsidiary Golden
Glory Resources Acquires 100 Percent Interest in the La Frontera Gold Project in
Colombia's Hottest Gold Exploration Region," represented that "[a]pproximately two-thirds of Colombian gold production has been from placer deposits in the Department of Antioquia, which is immediacy [sic] adjacent to and straddles about 30% of the leases where Golden Glory's La Frontera Project is located." Goff stated that "this project is seen to be on the order of six times as large as notable prospects with similar gold type and potential."
• On March 18, 2013, Goff issued a press release entitled "Goff Corporation Has
Appointed Experienced Colombian Mining and Explosives Expert Manuel Hernando Serna as a Director of the Board."
• On March 22, 2013, Goff announced that "Golden Glory Resources expects to pursue its exploration program that will employ leading geological consultants and their own geological staff to carry out the program .... This first phase exploration is anticipated within 90 days." On March 25, 2013, Goff represented that Golden Glory Resources "plans to begin a 5,000-rneter diamond drilling program on its La Frontera Gold Project in Department of Caldes, Colombia within 90 days .. ,
• In a press_release on March 26, 2013, Goff's sole officer and director, Calasse,
stated that"he expects gold's current price level will help fuel the company's
efforts to target a bulk tonnage, low-grade type gold and silver project on Golden
Glory's leases, and that the time is right for gold in Columbia." Calasse further
stated that "[w]e will be the first [on the Project] to explore using the full range of
modem gold and silver discovery methods."
• On March 27, 2013, Goff related that "Golden Glory Resources is developing a
comprehensive exploration program for its La Frontera Gold Project in Colombia; Phase One groundwork will provide basis for follow-on planned diamond drilling."
60. Bolstering the Goff press releases was a newsletter posted on April 2, 2013 on a
stock-touting website by the name of Penny Stock Pillager, which stated: "After years of tunnoil, the Colombian government is stepping in to help legitimate mining companies pull gold from their resource-rich soil. By grabbing a plot of land directly in the Colombian gold sector, investors in Goff Corporation could be on the verge of true wealth!" (emphasis original)
61. The representations of Goff and Penny Stock Pillager were never supported by
audited financial statements evidencing true wealth, gold mining interests, or diamond drilling.
On or before March 18, 2013, Goff was required to filed a "super" Report on Form 8-K that included all of the information required in a Report on Form 10. The company did not file such a Report on Fonn 8-K on March 18 or any time thereafter. Goff stopped filing Reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q at all times after March 18, 2013.
62. There is no trading data available for Goff on March 14, 2013, the day before the
company's March 15 press release announcing its mining interest in "Colombia's hottest gold exploration region." On March 18, the first trading day after the release, Goff stock spiked to a closing price of $0.28 per share on a volume of 263,914,096 shares. On April 5, Goff stock at a high of$0.58 per share on a volume of:22,003,500 shares. By June 4, 2013, Goff stock had fallen to a price of $0.01 per share.
63. Simultaneously with the Goff stock promotion, Caledonian, Clear Water, Legacy
Global and Verdrnont sold the stock into the public markets. Theirs were the first sales of the stock to the public. Caledonian Bank sold 35,000,000 shares of Goff stock for proceeds of $6,860,685; Clear Water sold 25,000,000 shares for proceeds of $4,226,689; Legacy Global sold 21,750,000 shares for proceeds of$3,293,816; and Verdmont sold 14,000,000 shares for of $3,526,354. Verdmont sold for the account of customers and received commissions on the sales. Caledonian Bank and Caledonian Securities have represented through counsel that sold for the account of customers and received commissions on the sales.
64. These sales of 95,750,000 shares of Goff stock generated proceeds of $17,907,546.
In making these distributions, the Defendants violated Section 5 of the Securities Act. There was no registration statement in effect for the Defendants' offers and sales of Goff securities. And 1hr, Defendants used the instruments and means of interstate commerce in offering and selling Goff securities.
61. The representations of Goff and Penny Stock Pillager were never supported by
audited financial statements evidencing true wealth, gold mining interests, or diamond drilling. On or before March 18, 2013, Goff was required to filed a "super" Report on Form 8-K that included all of the information required in a Report on Form 10. The company did not file such a Report on Fonn 8-K on March 18 or any time thereafter. Goff stopped filing Reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q at all times after March 18, 2013.
62.
But you continue to pump with false and misleading information which is illegal - ComputerBux did the same thing and he was indicted by the DOJ for pumping on iHub and Twitter.
Here you go - read it and start crying like Sharp.
From the SEC:
Please respond to these comments within ten business days by providing the requested information or advise us as soon as possible when you will respond. If you do not believe our
comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response."
"We note your disclosure with regard to the treatment of shares held by Warwick Calasse as treasury shares. Please provide your analysis as to why these shares should not be treated as issued and outstanding."
Sharp's response:
"We note your disclosure with regard to the treatment of shares held by Warwick Calasse as treasury shares. Please provide your analysis as to why these shares should not be treated as issued and outstanding.
Response: We have revised our disclosure to treat the Series A preferred issued to Warwick Calasse as issued and outstanding and to make clear that Mr. Sharp has retained control of Goff Corp. through the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of Series A preferred and 1,000,000 shares of common stock.
Sharp failed in his attempt to steal the Calasse stock.
If the SEC thought that Calasse obtained the stock fraudulently they wouldn't have made Sharp return the stock to Calasse.
So much for your hundreds of posts about Calasse - why do you continue to ignore the facts and keep pumping.
I posted an example about the CYNK CEO and they knew he was duped by the insiders just like Calasse was duped.
IG
LOLOL! Actually I have a great deal of credibility because I don't pump scams and attempt to get others to lose their investment.
It was a typo - but you can't accept the facts that Sharp is using the Calasse lawsuit to keep dragging this scam out.
Why don't you address the facts that Sharp attempted to steal the Calasse stock but when filing the Form 10 in the SEC comments they made Sharp return the stock to Calasse. Are you denying this happened?
Any competent businessman would not have allowed the Calasse lawsuit to completely halt all operations on WNFT.
If there was a company wanting to do a merger the Calasse lawsuit would not have stopped it.
Sharp has never operated a successful business - business is about putting out fires and it daily. Sharp is too immature, insecure and too sensitive to be a successful businessman.
But you continue to pump with false and misleading information which is illegal - ComputerBux did the same thing and he was indicted by the DOJ for pumping on iHub and Twitter.
I was one of those doing real DD to expose the scam.
I have credibility with the SEC - they trust the reports I send them.
IG
Enough said about your credibility concerning this topic.
Because the facts show that Calasse was never accused of fraud by the SEC - they never filed a complaint against Calasse.
Because the facts show that the SEC never was accused of fraud by the SEC
That is a unbelievably poor investment strategy and the reason you will never make any money investing in the OTC.
"The only thing I'm focused on is time and chance. WNFT previously went parabolic from.01 to .45, and on relatively low volume. I knew when the Calasse case wouldn't go away, that I would be holding all the way down simply out of principle, if for no other reason than to see Calasse lose."
Why would anyone knowingly hold and watch their investment disappear? So you hold and lose your investment just to watch Calasse lose.
That is one of the Dumbest posts I have read. You do know you could have cut your losses and used money on another stock - you could Buy back in - but now it is dead money.
The Sharp cult members don't understand the OTC is for trading not investing.
IG
That is exactly how you play the OTC - you don't get married to the stock/CEO - play the price action and always take profits.
I love it when someone knows how to play OTC scams.
IG
Do you understand that GOFF has been hijacked 3 times - by 3 serial scammers - Lazar, Tracy and Sharp.
Sharp hasn't accomplished anything of value on any of the hijacked shells but you are still pumping.
So you believe the SEC didn't file a complaint against Calasse because he didn't respond to the letters.
What you don't understand that those who do pump and dumps will use a puppet as the CEO and the SEC knows they are puppets.
On CYNK which went from $0.06 to $22.00 - those doing real DD found that the CEO was a 19 year old boat captain in Belize and was clueless - the insiders wrote the press releases and signed his name to all documents.
One of the insiders received 15 years in Federal Prison - but the SEC/DOJ didn't go after the puppet CEO.
IG
Because the facts show that the SEC never was accused of fraud by the SEC - they never filed a complaint against Calasse.
If the SEC knew that Calasse had committed securities fraud - why did they make Sharp return the stock attempted to steal?
What is your excuse for the SEC not filing a complaint against Calasse?
You were posting the Calasse lawsuit would be dismissed immediately and they would kick Calasse to the curb but that never happened.
You are just another Sharp cult member who is still trying to pump the OTC scams.
IG
The SEC's actions clearly states that they took the position that Calasse didn't commit fraud and was duped or conned when he was given the CEO position.
The SEC sent two letters in 2013, both addressed to the new corporate address in Colombia. That address is a real address and did exist, but obviously didn't reach Calasse as he never moved to Colombia.
Once again you are wrong about Calasse - damn Sharp has you all lathered up about Calasse.
The SEC didn't charge Calasse with securities fraud.
"the SEC took the position that Calasse didn't commit fraud but was a puppet.
The SEC has NEVER said that or "took that position."
The SEC's actions clearly states that they took the position that Calasse didn't commit fraud and was duped or conned when he was given the CEO position. Many companies gift a new CEO with stock. Actually, Sharp gifted himself stock. Sharp is the CEO/P/S/T/D and controls the vote.
The DOJ will indict you for securities fraud - it doesn't matter if you respond to a letter if there is proof of fraud.
Obviously, the SEC doesn't believe Calasse was involved in any fraud because when Sharp tried to steal the Calasse stock - the SEC made Sharp return the stock to Calasse. If they believed Calasse engaged in fraud - they would have in the Form 10 comments not asked about putting the stock in the Treasury.
It was obvious to me that the SEC thought of Calasse as a puppet that had been duped.
The problem is that you believe the Calasse stock and lawsuit have completely halted all business operations. You have been sold a Bill of Goods by Sharp that isn't a problem.
WNFT will be the same no matter who wins or loses.
I can't believe Sharp has turned Calasse into the reason for the WNFT depressed price.
IG
You can at least give him credit for spending his own money and obtaining proper legal counsel to fight off Calasse, along with all of the money spent on his tickers to maintain a tradable market on the OTC, which is actually a very expensive endeavor, especially when you are considering regulators such as the SEC, FINRA, etc.
The SEC tried several times to contact Calasse but he never responded since the address he gave to the transfer agent didn't exist. Plus he lives overseas where the SEC can't reach him and has no jurisdiction.
So what you posted might be true but is disingenious.
Lol Nicky. Always rejoicing at the misfortune of Sharp shareholders. It ain’t over till it’s over, and I wish you well. Hang in there buddy.
Ha! I made so much money off of this garbage! Loved your cord! Unlike you though, I knew to sell this garbage years ago! Enjoy!
The only thing I'm focused on is time and chance. WNFT previously went parabolic from.01 to .45, and on relatively low volume. I knew when the Calasse case wouldn't go away, that I would be holding all the way down simply out of principle, if for no other reason than to see Calasse lose. It's a matter of justice and the Supreme Court making the right decision that is in the best benefit of shareholders.
Sharp has the stock fully registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission which is good enough for me. Fully tradable with brokers. If you ask me, Sharp is waiting for the right timing in the IPO market and liquidity in general to launch the right type of deal, that will benefit shareholders in the best type of manner. We all know that when speculative assets and IPOs are dropping like crazy, that your deal has a better chance of succeeding.
You can at least give him credit for spending his own money and obtaining proper legal counsel to fight off Calasse, along with all of the money spent on his tickers to maintain a tradable market on the OTC, which is actually a very expensive endeavor, especially when you are considering regulators such as the SEC, FINRA, etc.
Those of us who were here in 2020 and 2021 saw the fireworks and volcanic eruption of TSNP, and the international headlines it made. The funny thing about TSNP is that just like WNFT, GVSI, FORW and SRNW, there was dead trading volume and not much going on before the merger blew up and made CNBC, Seeking Alpha, Forbes and tons of other international news outlets. To say something like that can't happen again is a complete fallacy.
I'll take my chances, and good luck with your zero shares.
I've been enjoying every minute of it. How have you been doing with your zero shares? Don't worry, I've been working the 70+ hour weeks so I can buy more Wolf Tickets.
Maybe I will file a report with a friend/actually an acquaintance that has been very helpful in the past. The only problem it is a great deal of work - and his scams are pretty small - but Sharp has scammed investors for over 5 years on FORW and 3 years on GOFF/WNFT, SRNW and GVSI.
In those 5 years as CEO of FORW he still hasn't generated any revenue - why would you defend this guy?
There is no doubt that if anyone that has worked with the SEC in the past that they trust - Sharp has some serious problems.
Sharp still hasn't informed investors about the 3 hijacked shells and why he hasn't filed a 15c for any of the shells. That is a huge problem for Sharp.
Myself and others that post real DD never tell shareholders to buy or sell - the pumpers ate always telling investors to buy - last time for cheapies - a rocketship better get on board - that is pumping and illegal.
I post facts and hopefully OTC investors that hasn't joined the cult or married the stock to make an informed decision before buying.
IG
He he he! He he he! Enjoy!
The argument that you haven't lost money until you sell. Because you have your money tied up for years - it is dead money.
There's definitely an opportunity cost, and I accept that fact. You can point the finger any which way you want, but it doesn't matter at this point. The only thing I am trying to do is eagerly await the Calasse decision, and manage my existing position as best I can.
If the parabolic run never hits, so be it. When I re-joined the OTC market back in 2020, I probably put about $5,000 into a couple OTC stocks, and hit it big with a series of trades, at which point I was able to invest about $100,000 into GOFF in early June of 2021. I then was able to make another $100k or so to pay off our car, credit card debt, along with put a down payment on our house.
So all together, regardless of what happens here, I'll accept the outcome, and it is what it is. But it's not over until it's over, and I still believe the odds are stacked against Calasse, due primarily to the fraud and sketchy $hit that happened back in 2013. I don't believe the SC will view those matters favorably at all.
Sharp is the scammer.
On a final note, I keep hearing this, but I fail to see any court briefings submitted alleging Sharp of fraud. Isn't that funny? Perhaps we will see something from Maverick and his lawyer submitted here before too long. Lol
$WNFT
Listen buddy, you can continue to play your morally superior high horse game because you think you're trying to defend and protect investors from Sharp, but I have been invested in this stock since June of 2021, at an initial average cost of .0233 (.07 GOFF price). I held most of my shares through the long decline, and I refuse to let Calasse win this show.
You can call that stupid, foolish, or whatever you want, and I really don't care. My average cost is almost under .01 at this point, with the fact that I have been able to buy more shares of this stock at such a steep discount. I understand many are bagged in this stock, and that's no fun either.
I'm bagged too, down well over 50%. But that doesn't mean I'm going to throw in the towel, just because retail traders want to crash the stock. In fact, I could care less if retail wants to crash the stock another 75% at this point. It's just more low liquidity games that don't matter in the long run.
Those of us who have who have been around long enough know that with OTC stocks, the volume, liquidity and atmosphere of the stock can change quickly. I know that there will be dozens upon dozens of more stocks that go on massive parabolic runs in the future, because that's just how the market works.
Buyers and sellers, that's it, nothing else. No emotion, nothing. We saw massive runs in 2021, 2017 and going back to 2013 as well. Isn't it interesting how the more money they create in the economy, the larger the booms in speculative assets seem to be when they hit.
Take it or leave it, this game is not for everyone, and nobody said the Wild West of the stock market is full of dandelions and cupcakes.
And Calasse has never been named as a defendant in a SEC complaint - no criminal charges.
the SEC took the position that Calasse didn't commit fraud but was a puppet.
In a pumping press release or posts on X from Sharp - he makes many claims but they never happen.
IG
The price is down 99% since 2022.
The argument that you haven't lost money until you sell. Because you have your money tied up for years - it is dead money.
It is pretty funny that you hate Calasse because Sharp told you to hate him.
The GOFF shell has been hijacked 3 times - and pumped by APS.
And Calasse has never been named as a defendant in a SEC complaint - no criminal charges.
The SEC complaint the SEC took the position that Calasse didn't commit fraud but was a puppet.
And the SEC made Sharp return the stock he tried to steal from Calasse.
Sharp is the scammer.
And Sharp isn't wired into the SEC, FINRA or the OTCM as most of the cult members believe but he is persona non grata.
He has been trying for a GVSI name change forever 7 months and can't get it done.
IG
Nice volume today - 250,000 shares traded at 10:39am.
You do understand that smart investors would have cut their losses after about 8 to 10% - it is crazy on the OTC to keep holding and losing money.
"The funny thing about losing money in the stock market is that on paper, it means nothing. When you hit the buy or sell button, that's when it counts."
Obviously, you don't understand the concept of money management when trading OTC stocks.
The OTC is for trading not investing.
The only way to trade penny stocks that use message boards, social media (Twitter - Facebook), forward looking press releases, pumping 8-Ks and paid promotions is to just consider them all to be scams and just trade them do not invest in them. You'll lose 99% of the time if you believe the hype.
IG
Only the members of the Sharp cult brag about losing money.
The funny thing about losing money in the stock market is that on paper, it means nothing. When you hit the buy or sell button, that's when it counts.
So how much have you lost so far?
Nothing, because I haven't sold. I actually made about $100k after taxes on the last run up. Could have taken more profits sure, but ever since Calasse has reared his ugly head, there will be no hitting the sell button.
Never thought I’d see .002 ever again, but hey, what I say…
once that promised land comment hit anything became possible! Good Grief aMIGHTY! 🙄
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |