I suugest you need a brain scan Stat because I have proven many times as well as Yolo but you are so married to WNFT/Sharp - you don't seem to be able connect the dots. When doing real DD you must be able to do abstract thinking and you are operating at a concrete operational thinking with Zero ability to abstract.
Here is where the SEC made Sharp return the stock to Calasse after Sharp attempted to steal the stock.
Because the facts show that the SEC never accused Calasse of fraud by the SEC - they never filed a complaint against Calasse.
If the SEC knew that Calasse had committed securities fraud - why did they make Sharp return the stock attempted to steal?
What is your excuse for the SEC not filing a complaint against Calasse?
Sharp's response to the SEC comments about the Form 10.
"We note your disclosure with regard to the treatment of shares held by Warwick Calasse as treasury shares Please provide your analysis as to why these shares should not be treated as issued and outstanding.
Response: We have revised our disclosure to treat the Series A preferred issued to Warwick Calasse as issued and outstanding and to make clear that Mr. Sharp has retained control of Goff Corp. through the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of Series A preferred and 1,000,000 shares of common stock.
Sharp failed in his attempt to steal the Calasse stock.
If the SEC thought that Calasse obtained the stock fraudulently they wouldn't have made Sharp return the stock to Calasse.
Then you posted your typical nonsense:
"I challenged you to post documentation proving this and you couldn't."
I did post the documentation to show - "The SEC's actions clearly states that they took the position that Calasse didn't commit fraud and was duped or conned when he was given the CEO position."
This is exactly like what happened in the CYNK pump and dump - a 19 year old boat captain was the puppet CEO - there was documents signed by the insiders using the puppet CEO's name.
3 of the insiders ended up in prison but the boat captain didn't get indicted - just as Calasse didn't get indicted. The SEC knew that Calasse was used as a puppet CEO - ergo Calasse wasn't charged with fraud.
Post your DD to prove that the SEC charged Calasse with fraud.
There is copious information I provided and proven the SEC never thought or charged Calasse with fraud.
Plus, I never stated that the DOJ was coming after you but the SEC goes after big time pumpers - you are just another knucklehead OTC pumper that never moves the needle.
This is exactly why I stated that you operated at a concrete operational level without any ability to abstract - when you post nonsense like the following:
"Where does it "clearly state" that the SEC stated that Calasse didn't commit securities fraud and that he was "duped" or "conned?" You can't produce that documentation because it's a lie."
Jesus H Christ - are you really that dumb that you expect a link etc.
Read the complaint - if the SEC thought Calasse was involved in the fraud he would have been named in a complaint.
Why don't you provide the complaint the SEC filed against Calasse - everyone knows that will never happen because the SEC understands that Calasse was a puppet CEO and had been duped by the insiders.
I posted the proof - but I doubt you can understand it.
IG
The First Casualty of Emotion is Reason.
