InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 86
Posts 2888
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/08/2020

Re: I-Glow post# 68702

Sunday, 04/14/2024 1:02:16 AM

Sunday, April 14, 2024 1:02:16 AM

Post# of 69211
The only thing I'm focused on is time and chance. WNFT previously went parabolic from.01 to .45, and on relatively low volume. I knew when the Calasse case wouldn't go away, that I would be holding all the way down simply out of principle, if for no other reason than to see Calasse lose. It's a matter of justice and the Supreme Court making the right decision that is in the best benefit of shareholders.

Sharp has the stock fully registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission which is good enough for me. Fully tradable with brokers. If you ask me, Sharp is waiting for the right timing in the IPO market and liquidity in general to launch the right type of deal, that will benefit shareholders in the best type of manner. We all know that when speculative assets and IPOs are dropping like crazy, that your deal has a better chance of succeeding.

You can at least give him credit for spending his own money and obtaining proper legal counsel to fight off Calasse, along with all of the money spent on his tickers to maintain a tradable market on the OTC, which is actually a very expensive endeavor, especially when you are considering regulators such as the SEC, FINRA, etc.

Those of us who were here in 2020 and 2021 saw the fireworks and volcanic eruption of TSNP, and the international headlines it made. The funny thing about TSNP is that just like WNFT, GVSI, FORW and SRNW, there was dead trading volume and not much going on before the merger blew up and made CNBC, Seeking Alpha, Forbes and tons of other international news outlets. To say something like that can't happen again is a complete fallacy.

I'll take my chances, and good luck with your zero shares.