InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 734
Posts 75409
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/01/2012

Re: Hi_Lo post# 68698

Monday, 04/15/2024 3:22:12 PM

Monday, April 15, 2024 3:22:12 PM

Post# of 68846
Once again you are wrong about Calasse - damn Sharp has you all lathered up about Calasse.

The SEC didn't charge Calasse with securities fraud.

"the SEC took the position that Calasse didn't commit fraud but was a puppet.

The SEC has NEVER said that or "took that position."

The SEC's actions clearly states that they took the position that Calasse didn't commit fraud and was duped or conned when he was given the CEO position. Many companies gift a new CEO with stock. Actually, Sharp gifted himself stock. Sharp is the CEO/P/S/T/D and controls the vote.

The DOJ will indict you for securities fraud - it doesn't matter if you respond to a letter if there is proof of fraud.

Obviously, the SEC doesn't believe Calasse was involved in any fraud because when Sharp tried to steal the Calasse stock - the SEC made Sharp return the stock to Calasse. If they believed Calasse engaged in fraud - they would have in the Form 10 comments not asked about putting the stock in the Treasury.

It was obvious to me that the SEC thought of Calasse as a puppet that had been duped.

The problem is that you believe the Calasse stock and lawsuit have completely halted all business operations. You have been sold a Bill of Goods by Sharp that isn't a problem.

WNFT will be the same no matter who wins or loses.

I can't believe Sharp has turned Calasse into the reason for the WNFT depressed price.

IG


The First Casualty of Emotion is Reason.