Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I know that Swingplane, GOFF and Xumanii were all pumped by Awesome Penny stocks - their newsletter had over 5 Million subscribers.
Their last pump and dump was CYNK - and the CEO was a 19-year-old boat captain in Belize - who was clueless but the APS crew signed all of the documents and press releases. CYNK ran from $0.06 to $22 - that was a real short squeeze.
I know that Swingplane, GOFF and Xumanii were all pumped by Awesome Penny stocks - their newsletter had over 5 Million subscribers.
Their last pump and dump was CYNK - and the CEO was a 19-year-old boat captain in Belize - who was clueless but the APS crew signed all of the documents and press releases. CYNK ran from $0.06 to $22 - that was a real short squeeze.
They did one pump and dump where they had made a deal with a Russian Oligarch - Mikhail Prokhorov.
"Remember, there were four companies named in this complaint (Swingplane, Goff, Norstra, and Xumanii)"
APS always pumped into dollars - then they always did a rug pull and stopped pumping - and left many bagholders behind who believed the hype.
Sharp is a rookie compared to the APS crew.
IG
So how much have you lost so far?
Only the members of the Sharp cult brag about losing money.
IG
Calasse isn't a big deal - Sharp is selling Wolf tickets and you bought them all.
Absolutely my friend. Wolf tickets to the moon. That would actually be a good crypto meme coin. Anyway, all the best to you, and no hard feelings. We all have our opinions, and I know it can get heated at times. That said, I'm still bullish and don't think this story is over yet. I suppose I'm one of the only bulls left. I've seen how stocks can go down 99%, only to rise from the ashes, and this is especially true with OTC stocks, where many times you have low liquidity and retail traders driving the price action. Anything can happen here, and until Sharp throws in the towel or stops filing financial statements with the SEC, then it is still fair game imo
At this point, after seeing what happened with GVSI's BS "merger" fiasco (and Sharp lying about never being issued his 20 million common shares even though he posted he acquired them years ago and even included them in GVSI's financials before they disappeared right before the price crash), I don't know who the bigger fraudster is - Calasse or Sharp.
It's amazing how you bend over backwards to defend Calasse. That's why you aren't objectiveveven though you repeatedly try to convince everyone by repeatedly stating so.
At this point, after seeing what happened with GVSI's BS "merger" fiasco (and Sharp lying about never being issued his 20 million common shares even though he posted he acquired them years ago and even included them in GVSI's financials before they disappeared right before the price crash), I don't know who the bigger fraudster is - Calasse or Sharp.
I hope the SEC investigates both of them. But I doubt the SEC will put much of an effort going after Calasse overseas.
The SEC is just stating the basic fact that a press release was issued in his name, and quoted from the press release. As Calasse was the sole officer, he was the only one authorized to speak for Goff.
However, that doesn't mean that he was personally involved
Yep backlog insane it appears
And by the rate us these useless judges the end of the world will come first.
Well, someone claiming to be Calasse made those press releases.
And by the rate us these useless judges the end of the world will come first.
You don't know that. Again, you post as if you're some sort of authority here. You're not.
My point is that the submitted date will appear at some point well before the decision, I assume, so you can check weekly (or check here weekly and someone in the collective will update us) and not miss anything.
Checking daily implies that there is going to be action you don't want to miss. I don't think that is the case, as there will be a procedural step before any of the judges look at it and make a decision.
Like the rest of us who own shares in Nasdaq companies, sure we're owners of a Nasdaq company too. Oh and we merged and sold companies all day long too.
LMAO!!!
Yes, we were listed on Nasdaq. If you operate a real public company you had better have a pedestrian understanding of business.
You really aren't very bright - you are Sharp's little pumper boy. You were yammering for several months about naked shorting and you were absolutely clueless about any type of shorting.
This is one brain dead post from you.
"You're assuming judges think like business people. They don't!"
No one but you thought that a state or federal judge thought like a business person.
IG
Why do post false and misleading information?
"That's not true. The SEC names Calasse as the person who authored and published the fraudulent GOFF press releases."
The SEC never filed a complaint against Calasse. The SEC made Sharp return the stock to Calasse that he tried to steal from Calasse. Odd you didn't post a link to where Calasse was charged with fraud - as always you are carrying water for Sharp. Stop being a leg rider and think for yourself.
IG
Business law is not business... Not understanding this distinction demonstrates a lack of real life experience.
Did you say you ran or owned some company? Based on your comments here, it must have been a popsicle stand that went BK on day one. LMAO!
Go back to your Mexican frejoles dude. You're overdue for another load. Once you pass some gas, read this post again. Maybe, just maybe it might make some sense to you. I doubt it, though, but I'll remain optimistic.
LMAO!!!!
How will you will see the submitted date without checking the case?
I don't think we need to be clicking daily. Nothing is imminent here.
Well, someone claiming to be Calasse made those press releases.
While I blame Sharp for the "promised land" post that misled investors, I do not blame him for Calasse popping up like a damn groundhog at the last minute.
I disagree. I expect the new judges to go after the oldest cases and shorten the response time. I am grateful to George sharp for bringing to my attention that the old cases are being "rampantly reassigned". It implies tome that they are going to rip through the old backlog. Time will tell. Its time to start clicking on the case status daily again.
"O'Flynn was the one that dumped them without a proper registration statement, not Calasse."
So why was Calasse making up bullshit about gold mining activity in a bunch of press releases? Seems to me that Calasse was directly involved with the fraud, or at least assisting these unscrupulous firms with the dumping of shares, by deliberately lying to shareholders about the ongoing endeavors with GOFF, in order to drum up demand for the shares.
Once again your post shows you don't know what you are talking about - just more yammering nonsense.
"You're assuming judges think like business people. They don't!"
Business acumen doesn't have anything to do with being a competent Judge! The Judge has to understand business law.
The OP was reposting what Sharp had stated. If anyone still believes anything Sharp says they deserve to lose their money. But everyone knows you are Sharp's little paid pumper.
IG
Similar to your Operating Parameters
The problem is that trusting Sharp to provide truthful and accurate information - Sharp only provide information that helps his agenda.
IG
I give Credit for finally agreeing gs promise land how about the pix of dog looking at the open sea...how about twiiiting he will address shareholders next week enjoy your long weekend....
When u or any1 buys a car boat or a house you need a clean title especially if he paid $500,000 k for a shell gs should of had his so called law team research who are the biggest shareholder before he bought GOFF...
HE GETS CREDIT FoR PINK CURRENT AND STOCK SPLIT MADE EVERY1 BELIEVE HE WALKED WITH A BIG STICK TAKING NO HORSECHIT FROM ANY1 THE OTC wiz....then after July 5th calesse court date where he said this won't be a problem...the 3 days later days HOUSTON WE GOT A HUMONGOUS PROBLEM NO MERGER....WHY COULDN'T HE SETTLE...WHY COULD HE SELL SRN ^ W INSTEAD....HIS FULL OF HORSECHIT...THOUSANDS OF GUILABLE SHAREHOLDERS LOST MILLIONS JULY 8TH BLOODY MASSACRE...
HE LIED
WE MADE BIG MISTAKE BELIEVING THE SCUMBAG...
I WOULDNT BE SURPRISED IF CALESSE IS A SPOOF TO BORROW TIME AS AN EXCUSE
I WOULDNT BE SURPRISED IF MR. MORMAL WAS INFACT GS....THE GUY ALWAYS KNEW WHEN NEWS HIT COMETH TIC TOKY...NO1 IS THAT SPOT ON...BURNER PHONEs ARE CHEAP $39 AT WALMART ON THE VERIZON PLATFORM
& LOOK AT GVS^ I ANOTHER LIE TRAIN WRECK
You are clueless about the OTC scams. Medbox in 2012 went from $0.10 to $202.00 - now was a run. CYNK went from $0.06 to $22.00. All of the APS pump and dumps had much better runs than the TSNP/HMBL. TSNP/HMBL was just another OTC scam - where investors were caught holding waiting for it to go to $100 and held and watched their investment disappear.
"I personally witnessed what Sharp worked out in terms of international dealings with TSNP, which completely fired up and ignited the OTC markets into a frenzy. That was the #1 best parabolic run in OTC history, hands down."
TSNP/HMBL wasn't even in the top 50 of the" parabolic"runs on the OTC.
You are trying to sell the Sharp BS but it isn't working.
IG
There isn't a deal - there never was a deal - there aren't any companies that is going to get involved with Sharp and the 3 times hijacked GOFF/WNFT shell.
"Yes I agree. There's nothing more important than getting Calasse out of the way and completing a successful deal for shareholders. With all due respect to GVSI shareholders, WNFT and SRNW are both SEC reporting, which is also a definite advantage in terms of the potential quality of asset."
Calasse isn't a big deal - Sharp is selling Wolf tickets and you bought them all.
If there was a private company that wanted to use WNFT in a reverse merger to go public - the Calasse lawsuit is meaningless and the deal would be done. Sharp has lied to shareholders about having deals lined up but the Calasse lawsuit prevented it. Sharp is so insecure and his whining is pretty funny.
But selling novice investors on the importance of the importance of the Calasse lawsuit is a world class hoax.
IG
Yes I agree. There's nothing more important than getting Calasse out of the way and completing a successful deal for shareholders. With all due respect to GVSI shareholders, WNFT and SRNW are both SEC reporting, which is also a definite advantage in terms of the potential quality of asset.
If you truly believe Sharp is a terrible person and doesn't want to seek the best fiduciary duty benefit for shareholders, then it would be best to sell and move on.
I will take my chances. In November of 2020, I personally witnessed what Sharp worked out in terms of international dealings with TSNP, which completely fired up and ignited the OTC markets into a frenzy. That was the #1 best parabolic run in OTC history, hands down. Tons of money from the deal flooded back into the OTC market, and numerous stocks reached $1 billion+ market caps in short order.
To say something like this can't happen again IMO is a complete fallacy. If we know fear and greed always drive the market, then why can't similar events such as this happen in the future? If it takes another 12 to 24 months for that life changing money to hit, then so be it. I'm here for "as long as it takes".
Ugh. There's just no getting through to either side. Conservative or liberal, democrat or republican, Calasse or Sharp, yada yada SC will lay the ruling down soon enough, and I can't wait for the day. My gut feel is that there is simply no consideration given for Calasse, due to all of the sketchy business dealings which took place back in 2013, followed by his abandonment to shareholders. As I've said previously, if I'm wrong I will eat dust and never post on here again.
You're assuming judges think like business people. They don't!
While I blame Sharp for the "promised land" post that misled investors, I do not blame him for Calasse popping up like a damn groundhog at the last minute.
Sharp has an opportunity to make up for his past mistakes, IF he cuts a deal with a prominent company and does a proper reverse merger into WNFT.
They will old pending cases first to clear back lock George informed us first Not these bashers
I disagree. I expect the new judges to go after the oldest cases and shorten the response time. I am grateful to George sharp for bringing to my attention that the old cases are being "rampantly reassigned". It implies tome that they are going to rip through the old backlog. Time will tell. Its time to start clicking on the case status daily again.
You still don't get - no matter who wins it doesn't change anything - Sharp still doesn't have a company lined up for a reverse merger.
Sharp has duped the novice investors - and it seems have never functioned in the business world.
Being a successful CEO - means that everyday you are putting out fires. Sharp is too immature to be a successful CEO - Plus Sharp has never operated a successful business.
This is more proof you don't understand the legal system.
"A pile of cases are presented to you. You don't start with the oldest but rather the most recent case and work backwards. Why? Judges know that if a case has been sitting around too long, something is amiss. Usually that means that a predecessor deliberately avoided ruling on the case for one reason or another."
As the cases come in - In Nevada, the chief justice or a screening panel determines the decisional track for cases retained by the supreme court. If the assigned panel determines that a case has been improperly screened, the presiding justice can reassign the case to a different decisional track.
The sure as hell don't say - that sounds too hard let's put it at the bottom.
Sharp didn't want the case to proceed because it would mean that Big Talk. Sharp would have to produce a company for a merger.
I hope you aren't serious with this BS:
"The case with Callesse clearly is one that the previous judges felt should be settled out of court. I believe that a decision by the judges would have set a dangerous precedent that they preferred not to author."
That isn't how the NVSC works - they have to provide a legal decision and not just some previous Judge felt like it should be settled out of court. If that was true the NVSC would still be required to provide a Decision - and it wouldn't include - I felt like it should be settled out side of court.
Why don't you provide case law to support this nonsense.
IG
I don't want to burst your bubble but the tone of GS's tweet is quite negative. Just consider yourself as one of the new ten newbie judges. A pile of cases are presented to you. You don't start with the oldest but rather the most recent case and work backwards. Why? Judges know that if a case has been sitting around too long, something is amiss. Usually that means that a predecessor deliberately avoided ruling on the case for one reason or another.
The case with Callesse clearly is one that the previous judges felt should be settled out of court. I believe that a decision by the judges would have set a dangerous precedent that they preferred not to author. ...and even if they do choose to rule on the case, it will probably be to pass it back down to the lower courts for a retrial or further investigation on a minute technicality.
A 100% resolution sufficient for GS to take a victory lap is, in my humble opinion, very unlikely. ...at the very least late 2025 or 2026, we might get more clarity, but not before then.
JMHO
I don't hate George Sharp. I hate lying scammers and pumpers.. Sharp is no angel either. He stole nodummy's information and filed lawsuits.
https://www.goodetrades.com/2017/10/
Calasse was given the shares that the SEC did not find improper. He may have been mentioned but was never charged with any wrongdoing like the others in the SEC suit.
The real criminal was Adam Tracy.
Explanation of Responses:
(1) On March 8, 2013, Mr. Calasse indirectly acquired an aggregate of 5,000,000 Series A Preferred Stock in the capital of the Issuer, in consideration of assignment of rights attached to an assisgnment agreement dated January 21, 2013 among the Issuer and Golden Glory Resources S.A., a company incorporated under the laws of Panama. Mr. Warwick Calasse holds dispositive and voting control of securities held by Golden Glory Resources S.A. The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible without restriction on a 1 preferred for 30 common shares basis (150,000,000 common shares on a fully converted basis).
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=9214636&guid=EXQ-k6aQxApCJth
On March 8, 2013 we entered into a Cancellation Agreement with our director and sole officer, Warwick Calasse, pursuant to which Mr. Calasse tendered for cancellation 158,750,000 share of our common stock held by him in consideration of the issuance to him of 5,000,000 shares of our Series “A” Preferred Stock.
http://getfilings.com/sec-filings/130312/GOFF-CORP_8-K/
Goff Corp (GOFF)
On November 23, 2016, Harvey Romanek filed a lawsuit against Adam Tracy in Clark County Nevada after buying the GOFF shell from Tracy.
https://promotionstocksecrets.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/GOFFTracyDaviesComplaint.pdf
According to that Complaint, Harvey Romanek is basically saying that Adam Tracy lied to him about what type of shell GOFF was. He is claiming that Adam Tracy advertised GOFF as a "clean" shell that was in compliance with all state and federal regulations.
The fact is however that GOFF was the subject of a Criminal Indictment and was not a clean shell.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=124181041
Romanek paid the asking price and subsequent fees that Tracy requested (with $20,000 going to Christopher Davies - Ambrose & Keith, Ltd), but now finds himself at the helm of a worthless dirty shell that cannot be cleaned up.
Romanek brings up many other issues in the Complaint which you can read yourself including other instances of fraud and disregard of corporate governance procedures and Nevada statutes.
https://promotionstocksecrets.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/GOFFTracyDaviesComplaint.pdf
He also points out how Adam Tracy violated state laws by not disclosing the SEC investigation against him to the Nevada courts when filing for custodianship of these abandoned shells.
Christopher Davies has his own issues. He was disbarred because of a drug arrest and his most recent dilution scam, ATHI, was suspended by the SEC
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=124148895
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=124226922
Amen. This either goes parabolic at some point, or I'm never selling.
I'm sorry that you are so blinded by your hatred for George Sharp that you actually think Calasse is the victim here. Calasse has provided zero value to shareholders, and the SC will see right through the BS, whichever desk this case finally lands on. If there is any question in terms of securities laws being broken, the SC will most definitely take the safe approach and rule in favor of the individual (or individuals) who will comply with applicable securities laws, and provide a fiduciary duty to shareholders. Calasse did not comply with securities laws or provide a fiduciary duty to shareholders. But apparently you and some others believe the SC cares about none of these things. Can't fix stupid.
O'Flynn was the one that dumped them without a proper registration statement, not Calasse.
So why was Calasse making up bullshit about gold mining activity in a bunch of press releases? Seems to me that Calasse was directly involved with the fraud, or at least assisting these unscrupulous firms with the dumping of shares, by deliberately lying to shareholders about the ongoing endeavors with GOFF, in order to drum up demand for the shares.
And I'm sure behind closed doors, there was probably some type of exchange where Calasse benefited tremendously. Once again, the SC will not look favorably upon these matters, and cluckster and his lawyer will be finished for good.
Can't fix stupid.
The point is this: if you violate securities laws and are involved with numerous unscrupulous firms, while dumping tens of millions of dollars of stock into the open market without a registration statement, and then you abandoned shareholders after these events unfolded, without ever proving that you owned the shares in the first place, what makes you think that the Supreme Court of Nevada would look upon these events as something that they should rule in favor of?
If this is the case, where is the evidence of dilution and of selling shares on the open market?
it was at .32 with no merger before Lawfare
Ohh okay. Well I’ll be right beside you. Have a lot of shares and bagged and been here for awhile.
Do you ever stfu! You are a complete idiot! Constant jabber! I don’t care how long it takes but one day sharp will execute l! When he does you will run like a chump biatch! Stfu
I used to joke around in discord about riding the titanic to the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean if the GOFF merger didn't work out. Turns out we are still waiting on a merger (and something else). Perhaps the Carpathia will pick us up soon, and it will be smooth sailing again. Either way, I'm prepared to go down with the ship.
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |