Replies to post #170552 on Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[PGG76109]

Sabotage is the only word that fits IMO period. I consider it a known fact. I don't care who is with me or against me on this statement I lost huge like many and I spent a lot of effort so I feel I know what I know to be fact. Glta. We need it a huge effort is against PPHM. PG

[Protector]

Nothing hypocritical about it. PPHM provides details, references verifiable to facts (a mail is a mail and either you produce it or you lied).

Furthermore PPHM produces elements they could not possibly know with information from CSM, no matter whether CSM told them or they learned about them from another external investigation.

And what is MORE, after these last amendements PPHM cannot say they don't know who it is! They wrote that the person (she) was present on the kick-off meeting and hence EVERYBODY present on the meeting knows who was the female project manager of CSM sitting there. there is even a meeting protocol from the kick-off! So stop the crap!

Plaintiff in the CA lingers (undeniably offered the same amendment basics for all the 3rd times even after judges warning) and just throws around mud with providing ANY facts supporting it.

All we hear from plaintiff in the CA are fact we already know from PPHM PR's and some anonymous ex-employees that bring nothing to the table except maybe the overall sentiment that management doesn't like the retail share holders which is a welcome sentiment if you accuse someone from SEC fraud.

So putting BOTH mentions of fraud on the SAME level is not correct. Furthermore the CA is even only still in the phase of deciding whether a trial will be held and the judge already twice said NO! In the PPHM vs CSM we are much further, its either settle or trial.

[Threes]

I disagree, CP is not putting words in anybodies mouth. The source being from the plaintiffs side are going to be written leaning to the plaintiffs direct as much as possible.
However, the plaintiff in the CA clearly has stated there best case in the original and two amendments without any significant substantiated collaboration. So in using there argument to qualify they have nothing is fair play.

Quite the reverse for the complaint filed by PPHM which includes details , dates, and collaborated evidence. The vials, the change in the protocol of the trial down to the capacity the female employee at the time of the switch. The internal check points that person "she" had to navigate to pull this off.
The cloaking of the act from her superiors.

IMO , CP has done his DD and qualified the facts as he sees them.

I am not a big conspiracy theorist and did not immediately buy into the sabotage angle, but, it appears CP was right on.

[bidrite]

Eyebuy, I respect you and typically enjoy reading your posts. Normally they are very thoughtful and have some great deductive reasoning. Lately it seems these posts have become a personal agenda to discredit CP. I have to completely disagree with everything you've written about any similarities between the CA and the case against CSM. They are not even on the same planet.

[Bungler]

EBS, in deciding a motion to dismiss the class action complaint, the first rule is that everything the plaintiff alleges must be regarded as TRUE. The argument is, even if it is accepted that all the allegations in the complaint are TRUE, the complaint fails to state a cause of action for which relief may be granted, as a matter of LAW (not fact). The class action plaintiff could have easily stated a cause of action, by lying and making up facts, their attorney surely knows what facts would be needed to state a valid complaint. The fact that they did not do so speaks to the gravity and seriousness with which attorneys approach what they can and cannot say in a legal filing. If anything, it shows that even ambulance-chasing bottom feeders like the class action attorneys, will not stoop to making up false facts. PPHM's attorneys are not going state FACTS in their amended complaint unless they have fully vetted them and convinced themselves that such facts are true.