I'm just trying to keep a level head and play a little bit of an antagonist. While I want to believe the best intentions are meant by PPHM and its fiduciaries, we can't make blanket statements of fraud, sabotage and automatic insurance payouts based simply because a plaintiff makes a complaint.
If anything, I think the lack of specific information about how the company actually came across those coding discrepancies is a HUGE red flag and one that I'm sure they don't want coming out through the discovery process. I'm guessing the dates of some of those events, e-mails, etc. might not mesh well with the "we didn't know until Sept. 20" approach they're currently taking.
I'm not trying to discredit CP, but rather offer an alternative, less ENTHUSIASTIC!!!! more realistic viewpoint with a slightly sarcastic undertone because his pom poms sometime bother me. The relentless cheer leading is his right, but I refuse to believe that someone with so much market knowledge and an unwavering ability to criticize anything management does is here for completely honest reasons. Take from it what you will. That's just my gut so I contribute what I can.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
