News Focus
News Focus
icon url

MiltonTonic

03/24/14 4:18 PM

#77286 RE: stringofpearls #77284

And we know NOTHING about the grow op deals! PRPM could have offered the grower $10,000.00 a year to hang a picture on the wall with LuxHold's name on it. As far as the share holder knows, that's the deal! No money to be generated from that deal.
If Luther made a good deal, he would have spilled it all over everyone. Same with the pot shop, if it were real, it would have been the main feature on the web page. It is nothing but fluff.
If the company had any intention of using the website for business there would not be misspelled words on it weeks after it was put up.
Why else would there be pics of rolls of $100 bills and pot leaves there? The web page was designed/created to boost stock sales and please greedy wanna-get-rich-quick investors. Shame it isn't working out for some investors.
People need to wise up. If the company had "indeoendent financing" like Luther said at the start, WHY THE HECK WOULD THE COMPANY WANT TO CUT EVERY UNEDUCATED PERSON ON THE INTERNET IN ON THE DEAL??????
Share sales is the only interest to PRPM, no matter who is running it!
Thoughts?
icon url

Bklynboy56

03/24/14 4:55 PM

#77310 RE: stringofpearls #77284

From High Times article:.......

"Republican representative Dana Rohrabacher of California recently coauthored a bill that would force the federal government to allow states to dictate their own tax laws for marijuana businesses. "If it was a secret ballot," he said, "the majority of my Republican friends would vote for it."

So if the Republicans are getting on board, it's only a matter of time. Just like the church going, staunchly GOP gal in her sixties, if not seventies, who was on the local news here in North Texas, representing a group advocating the right to choose.

Now there's some refreshing common sense for ya!


Lou