It seems his plan is quite clear. Drill get an indicated resource, uplist (my belief) build a pilot plant, JV with a larger player?
It doesn't take hundreds if not thousands of holes to make this resource compliant it takes 5 for the D zone. And the D zone is economically viable on its own. Yes it will take far more work to prove the others zones but that can be done years from now as the D zone will have a decade plus mine life on its own.
A different CEO would certainly get different results. Not sure if they would be better or worse. Certainly this style is hard to take as there is no urgency. Not sure there should be other than I would like to see a return on my investment.
Any shareholder can put together a plan for a new management team or any other changes but nobody has. Like the criticisms of Scott it takes action not talk and nobody has chosen to act?
I also don't believe that the recent financing in the field reduce the likelihood of us getting funded. I see it as the opposite that amount of risk capital available for mining is growing. That is a good thing. Most of the money raised by the recent Niobium projects seems to have no direct connection to Niobium users but more appears to be high net worth investors do to the recent funding's being private placements not JV of any kind.
Its not at all clear that we are behind other groups from a geology point of view we are from a share listing and reserve classification. I am unaware of any others that have separation worked out or have the benefit of anything close to the geology contained in the Gulf Minerals historical work.
It still seems like the best property, with the likely cheaper costs in a safe secure mining friendly country?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
