The point is NOT merely to be speaking of an individual who has chosen to move on. That is an extremely superficial (and defensive) way of choosing to hear what i'm saying.
Oh,i'm paying attention....
You're two posts led with a former investor,as if creating a prelude of sorts....
Then you alluded to Kim.
Am I wrong?
It does not feel good when the CEO or other insiders sell a large (or even small) number of their shares. Why? because they have the most access to info about what is going on. So their selling often implies they know there are problems.
You really don't know why a person is selling shares.
Insiders are everywhere and in all stocks;a few million shares exchanged and all of a sudden it's time to exit,stage left? Really?
Please read rayovac's posts on ZF....they're both respectful and insightful....in my opinion.
As I told you,I refuse to speak ill of him and won't bring myself to that level.
However I did notice that you've brought the person up yet again....
Similarly, when someone truly knowledgeable about the science behind KBLB--someone who used to be on the board 24/7 raving about said technology--decides to get out, that indicates to me that he is probably on to something, and that it would probably be a VERY good idea to do likewise.
This is a very defensive response to the point that Zinc has done the exact same thing before. This is the 3rd time. He was wrong everytime. So knowledge of the science is NOT the end all.
There is the science. We already know the science works. You don't do everything Kim is doing(including going to Vietnam) if your science is flawed.
There is financing, commercialization, filings, travel, negotiating, R&D, .......Take the blinders off. Stop looking at someone that knows the science from an investors standpoint. Go with what the scientists who are actually dealing with the science say, and not the individual that has made bad assumptions, in the past.