Again, disclosures are NOT "filings." Filings are done with the SEC and Secretary of States and I am going by "filings" at the SEC and the Florida Secretary of State.
That's why "filings" with the SEC and SoSs have a "filed" date and "disclosures" have a "published" date.
Since 2004 Dwyer has approved several AS increases including the AS increase to 100B, 2 name changes(wash, rinse, repeat) and a RS according to SEC and Florida Secretary of State "filings." In the Florida "filing" about the AS increase to 100B Dwyer checked the box that states he doesn't need shareholder approval to increase the AS, but the very next "filing" he claims that the AS is being changed from 1.6B to 1.6B, even Dwyer can't keep up with his own lies, but still checked the box that shareholder vote isn't needed for him to approve an AS increase.
Reliable sources used are SEC "filings" and Florida Secretary of State "filings" and they can be called "filings" because they have a "filed date" not a "published date" as in disclosures at OTCmarkets, but also lying to the SEC and any Secretary of State can carry criminal prosecution and of course they have to be signed and dated to be legal, like the amendment "filed" in Florida that supposedly contains a freeze and no RS clause but doesn't.
Maybe a letter to the OTCmarkets, the SEC and the State of Florida is needed telling them that the 9 year scam of what is now BCRAP has never done a RS of 1 for 100 with Dwyer in charge. I'm sure they'll believe you and make the proper corrections once they read the "filings." ROTFL
Calling a disclosure a "filing" is misleading IMO.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
