Baron Capital Enterprise Inc (BCAP)

[Lime Time]

But you would buy a dilutive vet scam that has no chance of ever getting any return on investment. But you would buy a failed CTO scam and continue to pump it throughout the years, and it has zero return on investment.

lolol, this stock has huge potential and huge return on investment at this level. I'm all in. Dump me your worthless shares, please 🚀

[Hi_Lo]

I suggest buy it now lolol but you can't

I would never buy this scam where a known scammer is trying to get custodianship (which he can't because he's an affiliate) and wants to give himself a $6 million salary.

Thank goodness the court for BCAP's custodianship has been notified about this scammer and his attempt at a section 3(a)(10) fraud the same way a whistleblower notified Spotify with solid evidence of his fraudulent scams there.

Your hero Jake Noch sure isn't making fiends. I've never seen so many people freely do research about him and contact companies and courts about his scams.

You sure know how to pick your heroes.

LOL!!!

[Lime Time]

Going to have a huge run here on the upcoming catalysts. I suggest buy it now lolol but you can't 🤣 😆 😂

[Hi_Lo]

Jake threw a bunch of money in this just to lose. lol

Yup, just like your hero George Sharp (not yet indicted?) did with GVSI.

I see you now have a runny-nosed spoiled brat scammer as another hero.

You sure know how to pick them.

https://www.billboard.com/pro/spotify-indie-label-streaming-fraud-millions-fake-accounts-countersuit/

Spotify Countersues Indie Label, Alleging Massive Streaming Fraud & Millions of Fake Accounts

Spotify has countersued indie label Sosa Entertainment and its founder Jake Noch, alleging massive streaming fraud, unjust enrichment and the creation of millions of fake accounts to generate…

In November 2019, indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment and its founder, 20-year-old Jake Noch, filed a lawsuit against Spotify that alleged the streaming service failed to pay royalties on over 550 million streams of its music. The suit, which was also brought on behalf of Noch’s PRO Pro Music Rights (which was later removed), sought $150,000 in statutory damages for each infringement, and alleged that Spotify removed its music not because it detected “abnormal streaming activity,” as the service claimed, but because it was trying to dodge paying royalties on the streams.

Now, Spotify has fired back with a countersuit alleging that Noch “designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams” in order to “manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters.” The filing, which is supported by screenshots of messages allegedly between Noch and a “bot farmer” and charts that show streams on Noch’s music go from zero into the hundreds of thousands in a matter of days, also alleges that Noch directed the bot farmer to create millions of fake accounts and changed the names of songs in his catalog to closely resemble those of established hit songs, like XXXTentacion’s “SAD!” and DJ Snake’s “Taki Taki.”

Spotify has countersued indie label Sosa Entertainment and its founder Jake Noch, alleging massive streaming fraud, unjust enrichment and the creation of millions of fake accounts to generate…

BY DAN RYS

In November 2019, indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment and its founder, 20-year-old Jake Noch, filed a lawsuit against Spotify that alleged the streaming service failed to pay royalties on over 550 million streams of its music. The suit, which was also brought on behalf of Noch’s PRO Pro Music Rights (which was later removed), sought $150,000 in statutory damages for each infringement, and alleged that Spotify removed its music not because it detected “abnormal streaming activity,” as the service claimed, but because it was trying to dodge paying royalties on the streams.

Now, Spotify has fired back with a countersuit alleging that Noch “designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams” in order to “manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters.” The filing, which is supported by screenshots of messages allegedly between Noch and a “bot farmer” and charts that show streams on Noch’s music go from zero into the hundreds of thousands in a matter of days, also alleges that Noch directed the bot farmer to create millions of fake accounts and changed the names of songs in his catalog to closely resemble those of established hit songs, like XXXTentacion’s “SAD!” and DJ Snake’s “Taki Taki.”

Indie Hip-Hop Label Files Suit Against Spotify Over Catalog Takedown

Noch, who lists himself as the chief executive of Sosa and Pro Music Rights, as well as a handful of additional music companies, has quite the proud litigious history, having released several press releases touting lawsuits against Spotify, Apple, Google, YouTube, Amazon, SoundCloud, Pandora, Deezer, iHeartRadio and more.

Pro Music Rights claims a database of some 2 million tracks, including more than 23,000 by various artists using some form of the name “LEGATO,” like LEGATO_DIMY, LEGATODE45, LEGATODI001, LEGATOGILL2002 and LEGATOKAL999, to name a few.

According to Spotify’s counterclaim, filed Monday (May 18), the service first detected artificial streaming activity on Noch’s content in March 2016 and eventually banned his music from the service, before extending that ban to all content related to Noch. Noch then tried to “smuggle” the content back onto the service using slightly different names and created millions of fake accounts to stream that music.

In June 2016, a whistleblower contacted Spotify with screenshots that purported to show Noch directing the person to create millions (direct quote: “i need millions”) of fake accounts. And while Spotify had identified the fraud a few months prior, the company had already paid a small amount of royalties to Sosa and Noch — royalties that otherwise would have gone to legitimate songwriters with songs being streamed by legitimate fans. According to the complaint, for one of Noch’s albums that jumped from zero streams to more than 400,000 in just days, 99% of its streams came from Spotify’s ad-supported free tier and from accounts registered to male users in the United States, a pattern that was also found for other works.

Noch then changed distributors and changed the names of some of his companies in order to dodge Spotify’s fraud detection systems, with slightly different artist names, song titles and cover artwork. In one section of the complaint, attorneys wrote that “analysts at Spotify found that 5,500 ‘users’ streaming one of the Sosa albums ‘originated’ from a small American town with a total population of 10,000. For that album, the stream count jumped from zero to 749,000 streams in a span of only two days… This pattern is highly anomalous and not at all correlated to any possible pattern of genuine streaming activity.”

In another example from the complaint, in what the filing calls “title track parasitism,” Noch and Sosa uploaded tracks called “SAD!” with the same punctuation as the XXXTentacion hit, and “Taki Take,” shortly after the similarly-named DJ Snake song reached the top 20 of the Billboard Hot 100. Some of the tracks that Noch and Sosa would release on Spotify were AI-generated sound loops.

In all, Spotify’s counterclaim seeks relief for fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, indemnification, unjust enrichment and deceptive business practices. As another line in the complaint reads, “This was one of the most egregious fraudulent streaming operations from a single rights holder that Spotify had to deal with in its company’s history.”

After the publication of this story, Noch provided a comment to Billboard which reads, in part, “Spotify’s claims are laughable… I also greatly look forward to the day we get to go to court, and I hope that all of Spotify’s shareholders will pay close attention to these cases… Time will prove that we are right.”

[Lime Time]

Yep, Jake threw a bunch of money in this just to lose. lol

I look forward to see how the catalysts come here. Buy low and sell high is how you play this OTC

[Hi_Lo]

Courts decided in the case I cited, they decided on lies, then those people went to jail. Jake is doing the same thing they did, only worse and wide in the open.

...and since the court case you referenced is now in the books it established a pecedent.

You don't have to be a lawyer to know and understand this.

Noch seems like he screwed up big time!

[Acme Investments]

I'll appreciate that!!

[SCAMBUSTERKING]

You got the wrong guy here, I have no connection to this ticker. I look to updating this forum when the shoe drops on Jake.

[Acme Investments]

Mr Lawyer what you're not citing is this case!! This is not going to go your way!! Your emotions are guiding you!! No emotion in Capitalism!!

[SCAMBUSTERKING]

Courts decided in the case I cited, they decided on lies, then those people went to jail. Jake is doing the same thing they did, only worse and wide in the open.

This will be HILARIOUS.

[Acme Investments]

Are you a lawyer?? No!! Jake is not going to jail!! Says a lot about your character!! They either grant it or no!! Again the courts will decide!!

[SCAMBUSTERKING]

That isn't how the courts work. The judge can only review what he is presented. If the lawyers involved don't provide all the info, misrepresent, and/or lie here is plenty of risk the courts will approve. Happens all the time, here is where a group did the same thing that Jake is doing, received court approvals, then the SEC a years later put them in jail citing they defrauded the courts.

https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-23206

Sorry, but I am right on this. shareholders cant win on this one either way unless the SEC takes their sweet time, Jake gets it trading then they arrest him before he can start selling shares.

[Acme Investments]

Things I wish I was taught how to do!! The courts will decide what's legal!! I'm sure you're not a lawyer or you wouldn't be here!! Lol 😂

[SCAMBUSTERKING]

He is literally asking to get a $6M salary per year in free trading shares in his motion for default, illegally I might add.

[Hi_Lo]

I said float. You're referencing total outstanding shares.

Jake P. Noch is an affiliate of BCAP since he owns 250,000,000 common shares no matter how much you try to twist information. And as an affiliate of BCAP, Jake P. Noch doesn't qualify for custodianship.

Luckily the court has been contacted with this information.

[Acme Investments]

I don't think Jake opened a practice to keep all these tickers to himself!! I'm sure he has been guided to do so!! He's not just winging it!! We definitely will be owned by another entity!! Depending on who it is I will decide whether to stick around or not!!

[Hi_Lo]

And this is the types of scam Jake P. Noch perpetrates (there is no way a court will grant him custodianship of BCAP):

https://www.vice.com/en/article/v7gmvd/spotify-sues-self-described-music-prodigy-who-allegedly-ran-royalties-scam

Spotify Sues Self-Described 'Music Prodigy' Who Allegedly Ran Royalties Scam

Spotify says Jake Noch "[generated] hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams" and engaged in "title track parasitism" among other fraudulent practices on its platform.

JC

By Jelisa Castrodale

May 19, 2020, 4:38pm

Last November, the 20-year-old head of indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment filed a massive (and massively complicated) lawsuit against Spotify, alleging that the digital music service hadn't paid royalties on more than 550 million streams of its songs. According to Billboard, Sosa Entertainment founder Jake Noch also named his other company, PRO Music Rights, as a plaintiff in the lawsuit, and the co-plaintiffs sought millions of dollars in damages, asking for $150,000 for each infringement.

Noch's lawsuit accused Spotify of a number of transgressions, including unfair and deceptive business practices, willfully removing Sosa Entertainment's content, "obliterating" his expectations, and refusing to pay royalties. In a statement, Noch said that he was willing to "fight to the end" if it meant that Spotify would ultimately compensate the artists who were affected.

"I have a duty to see this through so that I can pay my artists what they are owed from Spotify," he said. "I know others feel the same way as I blaze this trail for the music community, who I know is behind me and roots for our success in bringing down Spotify."

Part of Noch's problems with the company started in the spring of 2017 when Spotify removed all of Sosa Entertainment's song's from its servers and "blanket banned" Noch and his companies from using the platform going forward. According to Noch—who describes himself as a "musical prodigy" in his lawsuit—Spotify informed him that the songs were removed because of "abnormal streaming activity," but the company didn't give him the opportunity to explain what could've caused the weird-looking streaming data. Noch has alleged that Spotify just "fabricated a reason" to kick him off the platform, in an attempt to avoid having to pay the royalties that he was due.

But in its own countersuit, filed on Monday, Spotify says no, it was just because of the abnormal streaming, and also because Noch allegedly "designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams" in order to game the system and rack up a ton of royalty payments.

"Starting in 2016, Noch designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams on songs he had seeded on Spotify’s online music-streaming service," the company's complaint reads. "Noch’s objective was plain: to manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters."

Billboard reports that Spotify removed Noch's content from its platform after being contacted by a whistleblower who claimed that Noch had instructed a bot farmer to create literally millions of fake accounts to stream songs from the Sosa Entertainment catalog. Spotify's own analysts became suspicious when one of Noch's records went from zero streams to 400,000 in under a week, while a second album racked up 749,000 streams in two days. (Spotify also apparently determined that 5,500 of the accounts that played the latter record supposedly all lived in the same American town—even though the town's total population was just around 10,000 people.)

The company has also accused Noch of "title track parasitism," which involves uploading songs with the same name and punctuation of legitimate hit songs. Spotify's legal filing identified two "AI-generated sound loops" that had been given the same name as then-popular tracks by DJ Snake and XXXTentacion.

"This was one of the most egregious fraudulent streaming operations from a single rights holder that Spotify had to deal with in its company’s history," Spotify wrote in its complaint. The company's countersuit is asking for compensation for a long list of Noch's alleged transgressions, including fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, indemnification, unjust enrichment and deceptive business practices.

Damn, most 20-year-olds can only dream of being dragged that hard by an international streaming service. A musical prodigy, indeed.

https://www.billboard.com/pro/spotify-indie-label-streaming-fraud-millions-fake-accounts-countersuit/

Spotify Countersues Indie Label, Alleging Massive Streaming Fraud & Millions of Fake Accounts

Spotify has countersued indie label Sosa Entertainment and its founder Jake Noch, alleging massive streaming fraud, unjust enrichment and the creation of millions of fake accounts to generate…

BY DAN RYS

In November 2019, indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment and its founder, 20-year-old Jake Noch, filed a lawsuit against Spotify that alleged the streaming service failed to pay royalties on over 550 million streams of its music. The suit, which was also brought on behalf of Noch’s PRO Pro Music Rights (which was later removed), sought $150,000 in statutory damages for each infringement, and alleged that Spotify removed its music not because it detected “abnormal streaming activity,” as the service claimed, but because it was trying to dodge paying royalties on the streams.

Now, Spotify has fired back with a countersuit alleging that Noch “designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams” in order to “manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters.” The filing, which is supported by screenshots of messages allegedly between Noch and a “bot farmer” and charts that show streams on Noch’s music go from zero into the hundreds of thousands in a matter of days, also alleges that Noch directed the bot farmer to create millions of fake accounts and changed the names of songs in his catalog to closely resemble those of established hit songs, like XXXTentacion’s “SAD!” and DJ Snake’s “Taki Taki.”

Indie Hip-Hop Label Files Suit Against Spotify Over Catalog Takedown

Trending on Billboard

Noch, who lists himself as the chief executive of Sosa and Pro Music Rights, as well as a handful of additional music companies, has quite the proud litigious history, having released several press releases touting lawsuits against Spotify, Apple, Google, YouTube, Amazon, SoundCloud, Pandora, Deezer, iHeartRadio and more. Pro Music Rights claims a database of some 2 million tracks, including more than 23,000 by various artists using some form of the name “LEGATO,” like LEGATO_DIMY, LEGATODE45, LEGATODI001, LEGATOGILL2002 and LEGATOKAL999, to name a few.

According to Spotify’s counterclaim, filed Monday (May 18), the service first detected artificial streaming activity on Noch’s content in March 2016 and eventually banned his music from the service, before extending that ban to all content related to Noch. Noch then tried to “smuggle” the content back onto the service using slightly different names and created millions of fake accounts to stream that music.

In June 2016, a whistleblower contacted Spotify with screenshots that purported to show Noch directing the person to create millions (direct quote: “i need millions”) of fake accounts. And while Spotify had identified the fraud a few months prior, the company had already paid a small amount of royalties to Sosa and Noch — royalties that otherwise would have gone to legitimate songwriters with songs being streamed by legitimate fans. According to the complaint, for one of Noch’s albums that jumped from zero streams to more than 400,000 in just days, 99% of its streams came from Spotify’s ad-supported free tier and from accounts registered to male users in the United States, a pattern that was also found for other works.

Noch then changed distributors and changed the names of some of his companies in order to dodge Spotify’s fraud detection systems, with slightly different artist names, song titles and cover artwork. In one section of the complaint, attorneys wrote that “analysts at Spotify found that 5,500 ‘users’ streaming one of the Sosa albums ‘originated’ from a small American town with a total population of 10,000. For that album, the stream count jumped from zero to 749,000 streams in a span of only two days… This pattern is highly anomalous and not at all correlated to any possible pattern of genuine streaming activity.”

In another example from the complaint, in what the filing calls “title track parasitism,” Noch and Sosa uploaded tracks called “SAD!” with the same punctuation as the XXXTentacion hit, and “Taki Take,” shortly after the similarly-named DJ Snake song reached the top 20 of the Billboard Hot 100. Some of the tracks that Noch and Sosa would release on Spotify were AI-generated sound loops.

In all, Spotify’s counterclaim seeks relief for fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, indemnification, unjust enrichment and deceptive business practices. As another line in the complaint reads, “This was one of the most egregious fraudulent streaming operations from a single rights holder that Spotify had to deal with in its company’s history.”

After the publication of this story, Noch provided a comment to Billboard which reads, in part, “Spotify’s claims are laughable… I also greatly look forward to the day we get to go to court, and I hope that all of Spotify’s shareholders will pay close attention to these cases… Time will prove that we are right.”

[getmoreshares]

WRONG on this statement--- "Jake Noch is also an affiliate of BCAP since he owns more that 10% of the float which precludes him from being able to be custodian of BCAP."
Outstanding Shares
3,692,355,947
07/25/2024
Restricted
70,766,600
07/25/2024
Unrestricted
3,621,589,347
07/25/2024
Held at DTC
3,500,908,229
07/25/2024

[Hi_Lo]

BCAP is a disaster. It hasn't filed a financial report since 2017 and also has missing financials from 2013 and 2015.

BCAP had its SEC registration terminated with the SEC and never renewed it.

No current financials = no Form 10 approval by the SEC.

No current financials = no SEC/FINRA approval of corporate actions.

No current financials = no reverse merger.

No wonder this garbage is in Expert Market.

Jake Noch is also an affilate of BCAP since he owns more that 10% of the float which precludes him from being able to be custodian of BCAP.

Several individuals have already contacted the court and provided this information.

A big thank you and kudos to SCAMBUSTERKING (and others) for doing so.

[Pink Lady]

Yes, i also think that this is a clean shell
After getting pink current, it is excellent for merger or IPO....
Maybe by someone who likes the ticker "BCAP"
😉😉😉😉

[Acme Investments]

Just foolish thinking!! Only those with Canada 🍁 access can buy!! They know that!! They just don't want Jake to win!! These guys have a vendetta due to losing their arse!! That was extra Milwaukee best money 💵!! Lol 😂

[getmoreshares]

IMO- most of us are long term holders (before 2021)-- insinuating that were are short term pumpers is just nuts!

[Acme Investments]

Take a look at tweedle dee and tweedle dum!! Lol 😆 Bonding time?? Capitalism always wins!!

[SCAMBUSTERKING]

We are on the same page, I am just pointing out the speculative piece of it. If someone is indeed paid to promote a lie it doesnt end well when the lie is investigated. I just dont see that as likely here.

Frankly, Jake would tell him to go hard at me and so far he really isn't. Jake is fuming right now on how spot on I have him and he has to know the SEC is hot on his trail.

[Hi_Lo]

All I'm saying is that the SEC sometimes even investigate message boards for securities violations. I've read FBI/SEC indictments for message board scams artists before. That can be part of their investigation.

But I agree with most if not all of what you said.

[SCAMBUSTERKING]

They dont go after pumpers regarding payment until there is evidence of it, so someone would nee more than "he's way too bullish for the stock in reality." Just not enough for them to care, they get hundreds of those per day.

[Hi_Lo]

unless you took money for it.

That's the key and for the SEC to decide. The SEC has gone after pumpers on message boards like this before - many times.

We all just have to see how this scam unfolds.

[SCAMBUSTERKING]

Nah, speculation by shareholders sharing opinions isnt really something that you get in trouble for unless you took money for it. I doubt a pumper who is gambling ignoring the bearish info isn't really something the SEC cares about.

[Hi_Lo]

And certain lying scam artist pumpers here are aiding and abetting the Jason P. Noch custodianship attempt scam just to try to make a quick buck.

Jason P. Noch will never get custodianship if the judge finds out about what he's attempting to do here with BCAP's custodianship scam.

[SCAMBUSTERKING]

Lifelong scammer. The issue this time is I have no reason to stop making sure he sees jailtime. I wasn't scammed, I am not part of any lawsuit. Reporting crimes to the government isnt a crime. I'm untouchable and have no reason to stop. 🤣

Everyone else it was cheaper for them to just make him go away.

[Hi_Lo]

Not only did Jake P. Noch did all the nefarious things you mention, he also perpetrated...

"...one of the most egregious fraudulent streaming operations from a single rights holder that Spotify had to deal with in its company’s history," Spotify wrote in its complaint. The company's countersuit is asking for compensation for a long list of Noch's alleged transgressions, including fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, indemnification, unjust enrichment and deceptive business practices.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/v7gmvd/spotify-sues-self-described-music-prodigy-who-allegedly-ran-royalties-scam

[Walter4]

[SCAMBUSTERKING]

You don't understand the scam then. I dont care what happens here, I am solely after Jake P Noch for the numerous security laws he has violated. Whether or not someone saves this ticker or not is none of my concern.

The scam is, Jake will go to an obscure court, lie about the 3a10 exemption, to get unlimited free trading shares for $6M per year regardless of share price. He will sell until he can't anymore, then RS, and sell more. You see this from the eyes of shares being something of value, ownership, and sacred. Jake see's this as chucky cheese coins he can press out from a machine out back for unlimited play.

This is of course, unless I can stop him first. Check out my work though, see Crank Media CRKM that I got SEC revoked and HPIL which the OTC was so shocked how bad the scam was it is now CE and untouched for years. This is what I do for fun and I am very good at it. No one will touch Jake's baby SONG now because they know the scam, he has been caught.

The SEC already has an open investigation on it surrounding the use of the Reg A, the illegal use of a 3a10 exemption, and securities fraud around the timing and claims by Jake through press releases and social media posts deceiving shareholders into buying stock while he was selling hundreds of millions to billions.

Tweets about share buybacks, while had converted 14B shares to sell under the 3a10 but was "only" able to sell ~2B. Saying dilution was a "false narrative" literally as he is dumping shares and not updating the SS to hide the fact he over 10x'd the OS. Share reduction pump so he could sell 749M shares into the market then he complained about the PPS blaming flippers (when it was him).

He is the Chairman, CEO, CFO, 80% voting power, etc of the company, an affiliate of affiliates, Yet he obtained free trading shares illegally and caused 20+ false claims to shareholders to increase buying volume while he was selling those shares. Caught red handed, because he put out a NOBO list showing he still had them in July they were at the TA, then noted in tweets right after he deposited them the DTC number through twitter, then noted at years end he no longer owned any shares.

We have the whole timeline of how he works his scams and that is in the SEC's hands. Like, Jake really doesn't understand how F'd he is. Davy, his lawyer, is too stupid to ever get it. They don't scare me, the CRKM and HPIL weirdos have been sending me death threats for years, the CEO sending me threatening emails and lawsuits. Nothing has happened because I am 20x smarter than them or their dumb lawyers. Davy didn't even know he had to domesticate the subpoenas wasting months... just to find out after they do all that the social media companies will tell him to f off like iHub already did and there is nothing he can do. They are the equivalent of the kids who couldn't make the special ed debate team.

When the SEC comes in, whether or not Jake gains control of this shell or not is the last thing on their mind. Trust me.

[SCAMBUSTERKING]

Yes. He would, then try again later. At least youd all have a shot to get out.

[Acme Investments]

Jake may not even hold on to the tickers!! He may sell them!! Remember there's many possibilities!! Don't let the detractors scare you!!

[Hi_Lo]

His affiliate status is well covered by this individual who has already contacted the court with pertinent information.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174788980

[Acme Investments]

He went into private practice specifically to take advantage of the goldmine of tickers available due to the new rules!! He's not just going after 4 that's just the start!! That's why I gave him my expert tickers to take a look at!!

[Hi_Lo]

He owns COMMON shares here -- not likely to stab himself in the foot with a RS

He also owned common shares in SONG. That didn't stop him from doing a 1 for 500,000 reverse stock split there.

[Hi_Lo]

Correct. He owns a huge amount of common shares here. One of the requirements for custody, that means the share price will go up as the process progresses.

He is an affiliate which disqualifies him from gaining custodianship.

[Lime Time]

Correct. He owns a huge amount of common shares here. One of the requirements for custody, that means the share price will go up as the process progresses. Some with a low IQ are unable to comprehend this.

[Hi_Lo]

Jake P. Noch's other stock board - SONG - is full of information about this character who's trying to get custodianship here.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/Music-Licensing-Inc-SONG-20122

[getmoreshares]

He owns COMMON shares here -- not likely to stab himself in the foot with a RS

[Hi_Lo]

Jake P. Noch just did a 1 for 500,000 reverse stock split on his other stock SONG:

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SONG/security



Something to look forward to here if he ever manages to get custodianship. It's his MO.

[getmoreshares]

May 14th Jake P. Noch Family Office, LLC. Files Complaint Seeking Custodianship of Baron Capital Enterprise, Inc. (OTC: $BCAP)

IN THE COUNTY COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
CIVIL ACTION
Jake P Noch Family Office LLC CASE NO. 11-2024-CA-000998-0001-XX
a Florida Limited Liability Company,
Plaintiff,
v.
Baron Capital Enterprise Inc.
a Florida Corporation,
Defendant

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
Plaintiff, Jake P Noch Family Office LLC, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure
1.500(b), hereby respectfully moves this Court for a default judgment against Defendant, Baron
Capital Enterprise Inc., and states:
1. This is a civil action for damages in excess of $50,000, against Defendant.
2. Plaintiff owns more than 250,000,000 shares in BCAP.
3. BCAP is the symbol that Defendant uses to trade on the Over The Counter Market.
4. On May 13, 2024, Plaintiff commenced this suit, asserting bought common shares
over the OTC market from Defendant, and Plaintiff took a position within
Defendant’s company and owned over a substantial amount of common shares as
of today.
5. Defendant was not and is currently not compliant with its annual or quarterly
reporting requirements as a publicly traded company therefore, as a shareholder,
Plaintiff requested in writing to Defendant corporate records of the company.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order granting a
default judgment against Defendant Baron Capital Enterprise Inc. in favor of Plaintiff and
granting Plaintiff’s initial requests in the Complaint and such other and further relief as this
Court deems just and proper. Furthermore, Plaintiff requests that this Court:
1. Appoint Plaintiff as Chairman of the Board (COB) and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of
Baron Capital Enterprise Inc. without the need to hold a formal shareholder vote.
2. Grant Plaintiff custodianship of Baron Capital Enterprise Inc.
3. Remove all existing share classes that Plaintiff deems necessary.
4. Provide Plaintiff with a voting control block as part of this process.
5. Address and resolve any voting rights issues as requested by Plaintiff.
6. Plaintiff’s annual salary as a custodian would be paid as a form of convertible note. The
convertible note shall permit the Custodian Jake P. Noch or his affiliated entities or third
party entities to receive shares until Jake P. Noch is able to realize six million dollars
($6,000,000.00) in cash with any other expenses incurred to realize this amount.
Additionally, Plaintiff will receive 50% of the net profit of all future ventures that Plaintiff
formalizes under the company. The note shall remain valid and in effect until Mr. Noch
realizes six million dollars ($6,000,000.00), and additional shares may be added to the
convertible note as necessary in order for such amount to be received. The entity shall
indemnify Plaintiff due to unknown liabilities that may pre-exist. This salary mechanism
is for the risks undertaken and costs incurred in cleaning up regulatory issues, restructuring
the business, and acquiring or building a new company, ensuring the continued benefit to
shareholders.
7. Conduct the reimbursement, convertible note, and the shares related in this transaction as
a 3(a)(10) exemption of the Securities Act of 1933 and hold a fairness hearing to ensure
compliance with the exemption process.
Additionally, the custodian will take over the Series AA shares, BB shares, and any other control
blocks and will have the discretion to determine the structure of the shares currently in existence.
Furthermore, Plaintiff requests the Court to create a class of shares called Preferred J Class with
the following rights:
1. Each share in the Preferred J Class can vote on all matters.
2. The Preferred J Class is intended to be exclusively held by Jake P. Noch or his affiliated
entities.
3. The Preferred J Class will have 80% voting power across all classes of shares of the
company.



Explanation of Benefits of 3(a)(10) Exemption:
The 3(a)(10) exemption under the Securities Act of 1933 allows for the issuance of securities in
exchange for bona fide claims without the need for registration under the Act, provided that a
fairness hearing is held and the court approves the transaction. This exemption is beneficial for
the following reasons:
1. Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness: By utilizing the 3(a)(10) exemption, the transaction
can proceed without the lengthy and costly process of registration with the SEC, saving
time and resources for all parties involved.
2. Protection for All Parties: The requirement of a fair hearing ensures that the interests of
all shareholders and stakeholders are considered and protected, providing a transparent
and equitable process.
3. Regulatory Compliance: The exemption allows the company to comply with securities
laws while addressing the urgent need for restructuring and regulatory clean-up, which
are necessary for the company's survival and future growth.
4. Facilitates Reimbursement and Investment: This process enables Plaintiff to be
reimbursed for the significant risks and costs undertaken in the restructuring and clean-up
process. It also facilitates the necessary investment to acquire or build a new company,
ultimately benefiting the shareholders by restoring the company’s viability and enhancing
its value.

https://cms.collierclerk.com/cmsweb/

[easymonee]

Agree on a 10x move min. from .0004-.0005. It is always a numbers game when they come back to life.

[Lime Time]

I agree. Looks about 250m or 300m which at this price is cheap. I'm bidding the .0001s, hopefully some idiot will dump it. This Jake guy has a way with words and seems to be very knowledgeable with how to handle FINRA comments.

[getmoreshares]

looks like the post confirmed our guess concerning how many shares J.N bought-- 250M+ common

[Lime Time]

Huge accumulation in the .0004/.0005 range.

Tells me this will easily hit .005 and probably .02 in 2025 🚀

[JMoneyHoops]

Well if he has to amend the submission with no “debt” as compensation I think he’ll still go for the shell as he bought lots of shares on the open market

[JMoneyHoops]

Well said, should be a nice runner once filings start hitting the disclosures tab