News Focus
News Focus
Replies to #1585 on The Black Box
icon url

wahz

05/03/03 12:58 AM

#1586 RE: wahz #1585

Hate to tell you, but as I check through my various calculations I find that there is absolutely no precedent for a greater than 7.5% drop in the dow on whatever turn we get, and more impressively, 7% is the highest pull back within 12 months of a reading like this, on my stuff. This is going back to the twenties.

3-5% drop on the inital turn is the norm

Sure glad I went short.......

I can't get stats on the nasdaq, but i would guess that 10% on the ndx 100 would be all that could happen, and that could be 12% on the q's. 7-10% on the q's is probably a reasonable guess. Bet we are lucky to get 7% on the q's. That might be from 28.80 to 26.80, which would be nice, before we plow to about 60 in 3 years.

The institutions will be full of bear's by then, wondering how its possible msft spiked to a new all time high at 60, when they were projected to earn only 1.80 in 2008

Remind me to just wait for the turn next time!

icon url

Rick Storm

05/03/03 8:04 AM

#1587 RE: wahz #1585

Wahz, could you take a look at this and tell me what you think? thanks

"
Posted by: Rick Storm
In reply to: positiontrader who wrote msg# 1251 Date:5/3/2003 7:59:38 AM
Post #of 1253

Positiontrader, i looked back on stockcharts at 91 92 timeframe at nl and saw after massive runs and very few new lows, we were in a trading range for months after both these times. I hope someone else has the time to compare the Spx to NL over the years that are available. Do you have an Ndx retrenchment number?


Also, I have been wondering that after this move from 1253 on the Naz to 1521 plus ,A 21% move so far; I wonder that when when we top say at 25%, if we will not be in a trading range for a long period of time , say till next October and not the consensus of a cyclic bull? I wonder if the Vix is tipping us off to a prolonged trading range? I appreciate all your contributions and honesty!!"




icon url

Rick Storm

05/03/03 8:05 AM

#1588 RE: wahz #1585

sorry duplicate--RS