What she said was comprising was a well defined term and ought to be given it's well defined meaning. She went on to say not sure if it will make a difference. I recall your reference to her saying that's what I was hoping you'd say, but to me that means she wanted him to get to his point as to why he believed that point.
All of this is pretty subjective and doesn't mean a hill of beans, but the judge seemed to me to say, Look the lower court judge made a mistake here and we're going to evaluate it within the terms of the well defined definition. That may not change the outcome of the case, however, she seemed to hedge in saying, not sure if it makes a difference.
Just a thought.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
