News Focus
News Focus
icon url

chipguy

02/10/06 8:56 AM

#24876 RE: smooth2o #24875

Well, why NOT countersue?

That would generate exactly the publicity that AMD craves.
Let the clowns play their silly word games while they gather
the rope that will hang their credibility in the eyes of people
who matter a lot, perhaps the most - IT pros.

icon url

dlr_972

02/10/06 10:00 AM

#24877 RE: smooth2o #24875

when equating amd vs intel to david vs goliath, one must wonder how many 'davids' goliath slew before 'the david'
icon url

The Duke of URL

02/10/06 10:35 AM

#24878 RE: smooth2o #24875

Counter-suing would NOT be in the best interest of Intel. At BEST, it would stir up the pot and prolong the litigation. At worst it would be a public relations nightmare that AMD could play on as David to big Ole meanie Goliath, Intel.

No, the legal concept here is to REDUCE the interaction with AMD as much as possible. This is not an accurate analogy, but it is like trying to win an argument with a kid. Even if you win, you loose.

No, the correct legal corollary that is applicable here, is

"NEVER GET INTO A PISSING MATCH WITH A SKUNK"


:)))

Duke, J.

[edit, after posting, I see others are of the same mind]

On the other hand, the wrong of "Abuse of Process" leaps to mind. It would not be above belief that AMD instigated this investigation just for the publicity.

Abuse of process is a common law intentional tort. It is to be distinguished from malicious prosecution, another type of tort that involves misuse of the public right of access to the courts. Malicious prosecution requires hatred or ill-will and the process must be determined IN FAVOR of the plaintiff.

That has not happened yet.

But, the elements of a valid cause of action for abuse of process in most common law jurisdictions are as follows:

it is the deliberate misuse or perversion of regularly issued court process (civil or criminal) not justified by the underlying legal action. ... The person who abuses process is interested only in accomplishing some improper purpose that is collateral to the proper object of the process and that offends justice, such as an unjustified arrest or an unfounded criminal prosecution. ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_prosecution


icon url

tecate

02/10/06 7:24 PM

#24895 RE: smooth2o #24875

I was hoping IF Intel wins this suit Amd has brought and I hope they do, that afterwards Intel would sue Amd for frivolous lawsuit or something like that.. besmirching their name. But Intel seems to be the same - like Borg :)