News Focus
News Focus
icon url

trkyhntr

04/30/03 10:30 AM

#13491 RE: SoxFan #13489

No kidding sox. So I repeat, I guess what you are saying is that SARS is a more dangerous disease? For your information, I already knew what you posted, and for that matter so did probably everyone else on this board.
You just aren't going to give up and admit what you are trying to sell us is baloney, are you. In this country, where most of those of us who post on this board, AIDS was first a disease of homosexuals which has more recently spread to heterosexuals. AIDS is a deadly disease with mortality rates much higher than most other deadly diseases. The spread of AIDS could be prevented by not having sex with someone who has it. Homosexuality is not normal, and AIDS is higher in frequency in the homosexual community because of promiscuity, not because homosexuality is immoral. It is increasing in the heterosexual community (if there is allowed to be such a thing) because of promiscuity. The religious right is correct on at least one point. Abstinence would not only reduce teenage pregnance, but AIDS incidence as well. Of course, you are free to disagree with all of the above if you wish. You will be wrong IMO, but you may still disagree.
icon url

alexed

04/30/03 10:59 AM

#13493 RE: SoxFan #13489

The infection rate for SARS will be significantly greater

That is a very questionable statement at this point in time.The genetic map has already been completed of SARS and at this time it has not mutated into a different strain.Not everyone that gets SARS dies!Some people recover.The population most susceptible to SARS are the immunosuppressed and the population that fits into older {40-60) and elderly.So far the young seem to be the most resistant to this pneumonia.As long as it does not mutate,a vaccine is possible.This virus is only in its infant stages,much to be investigated at this time.