To get back to your point I did see that 15-12g filing as well on May 15th 2007 but I was under the impression that the subsequent RW filing on December 12th 2007 http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingPdf?FilingID=5595594 nullified or withdrew the attempt to terminate the registration... Maybe I read it wrong but it looks to me like the registration termination was withdrawn. It looks like Carver was trying to terminate the shares according to the 15-12g >>>The Company requests that its Form 15-12G Certification and Notice of Termination of Registration under Section 12 (g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Suspension of Duty to File Reports under Section 13 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 dated May 14, 2007, be withdrawn effective immediately.
They had 333 shareholders of record less than the 500 threshold and definitely less than the $10 million
(Termination of registration of a class of securities under section 12(g) of the Act shall take effect 90 days, or such shorter period as the Commission may determine, after the issuer certifies to the Commission on Form 15 (17 CFR 249.323) that the class of securities is held of record by:
Less than 300 persons; or
Less than 500 persons, where the total assets of the issuer have not exceeded $10 million on the last day of each of the issuer's most recent three fiscal years.
The issuer's duty to file any reports required under section 13(a) shall be suspended immediately upon filing a certification on Form 15; Provided, however, That if the certification on Form 15 is subsequently withdrawn or denied, the issuer shall, within 60 days after the date of such withdrawal or denial, file with the Commission all reports which would have been required had the certification on Form 15 not been filed. If the suspension resulted from the issuer's merger into, or consolidation with, another issuer or issuers, the certification shall be filed by the successor issuer.)
With the registration termination request being withdrawn the registration was and is technically still in effect correct?