News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Mad Money Monkey

12/20/13 1:59 AM

#94999 RE: 4on4off #94998

Yes, I disagree. Why not confirm or squash the issue. Easy to squash it, if it's a falsehood. If not a falsehood, the company will refuse to answer. Just trying to give the company a chance to verify or deny that claim. If the company chooses to remain silent, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out the truth.

I'd also like to state it's pretty audacious to ask the investors to not ask questions, and expect answers, just keep piling $$$ into the company and DON'T ask any important questions, just unimportant ones and to just BLINDLY BELIEVE in PVEC.
icon url

Seaam

12/20/13 2:02 AM

#95000 RE: 4on4off #94998

I have stated the Atty contact information, the court case, the court, posted before a screen shot of the case docket . Named the plantiffs that informed me, etc. Come on, do a little Dd.

The company should also respond to this. It is not the responsibility of a poster to do anything more.

You could also call the court clerk and ask if that motion is before the judge.

Why does the company hide so much material events? The history of unfulfilled PRs and non disclosure, based on today's late filing, is alive and well.