Jim Stop Loss - apologize accepted where none was really necessary. Despite what may appear to be a caustic attitude toward the company I am fairly objective towards posters here, including the ones with differing opinions. I bought in at .006/.005+ range and then again at .0099 range as the .01 range appeared to be a significant barrier that once broken would continue higher.
I feel that I have been backing up my opinions with facts -- namely the lack of an audit with little to no explanation as to why it has taken eight months since there original 4 week estimation. That combined with relations to paid stock promoters and their inability to return emails. To me it comes down to one of two things -- either they are crooks or they shouldn't be running a publicly traded company. I say nothing about their ability to run and grow a company or their knowledge of their own industry and ability to execute. I only criticize those aspects of managing involving public company status.
I do appreciate your input on the trading range of this stock. It looks like my last trade in the .01 range might have been a mistake based on your channel theory which I don't doubt.
I will continue to be critical of management until they begin to deliver on their promises (that or they go on a run which I will not stand in the way of). Please don't take offense to it. Its not directed at you.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
