News Focus
News Focus
Followers 1
Posts 301
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/02/2005

Re: jim stop loss post# 7034

Wednesday, 02/01/2006 2:36:57 PM

Wednesday, February 01, 2006 2:36:57 PM

Post# of 33337
Jim Stop Loss - apologize accepted where none was really necessary. Despite what may appear to be a caustic attitude toward the company I am fairly objective towards posters here, including the ones with differing opinions. I bought in at .006/.005+ range and then again at .0099 range as the .01 range appeared to be a significant barrier that once broken would continue higher.

I feel that I have been backing up my opinions with facts -- namely the lack of an audit with little to no explanation as to why it has taken eight months since there original 4 week estimation. That combined with relations to paid stock promoters and their inability to return emails. To me it comes down to one of two things -- either they are crooks or they shouldn't be running a publicly traded company. I say nothing about their ability to run and grow a company or their knowledge of their own industry and ability to execute. I only criticize those aspects of managing involving public company status.

I do appreciate your input on the trading range of this stock. It looks like my last trade in the .01 range might have been a mistake based on your channel theory which I don't doubt.

I will continue to be critical of management until they begin to deliver on their promises (that or they go on a run which I will not stand in the way of). Please don't take offense to it. Its not directed at you.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today