Replies to post #60041 on Medinah Minerals (MDMN)

[Chilean spy]

This is where we differ. For me it comes down to one thing - if Medinah lands a joint venture with a "respectable" partner, the underperformance of the previous years will be long forgotten as it was when the stock ran to .19 in 2011, and later to the .17 range with Amarant. The authorized shares are meaningless unless and until they are used.

This is where we differ. For me it comes down to one thing - if Medinah lands a joint venture with a "respectable" partner, the underperformance of the previous years will be long forgotten as it was when the stock ran to .19 in 2011, and later to the .17 range with Amarant. The authorized shares are meaningless unless and until they are used.
This is where I think you may need some assistance and I am saying this respectfully. the word you use is "IF" and that is a humongous "IF" which has exponentially grown in the last couple of years with Partner A, B, C and who know who else. As a person who deals on a daily basis with facts otherwise , I would literally kill people, all the so call DD is merely a rumor or a distorted way of looking at things. You are giving me looking forward statements. That in real life is not sufficient. An assessment on this stock is not any different than any american corporation. Imaging the corporate world without profit really? for 16 years?. Assessments must be driven by facts and facts alone. The facts we have is the History of the Medinah is a real tangible solid fact and that is a fact. It is not 16 years of speculation enough for any shareholder?

[Chilean spy]

This is where we differ. For me it comes down to one thing - if Medinah lands a joint venture with a "respectable" partner, the underperformance of the previous years will be long forgotten as it was when the stock ran to .19 in 2011, and later to the .17 range with Amarant. The authorized shares are meaningless unless and until they are used.

When you spend more time on this stock you might be able to see what the longs have been talking about. I do respect your due diligence but facts are facts and the results will never change unless you change either the players, the method in which this organization has been conducting business, and the owner. All that has happened in too many years needs to change to see this stock turning around.