InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Brugg3

10/19/13 5:15 PM

#52322 RE: rk091161 #52321

Yup I'm talking short term a dime or two.

I'm holding my shares for dollar land
icon url

Brugg3

10/19/13 5:16 PM

#52323 RE: rk091161 #52321

Here since 003 haven't sold a shares yet.
icon url

JerryNyc1

10/19/13 6:30 PM

#52340 RE: rk091161 #52321

yea def ipo... merged to go public and now bring on the good news wialan!!
icon url

Inorout

10/19/13 11:13 PM

#52359 RE: rk091161 #52321

You're wrong. The transaction between Wailan and ACYD was indeed a reverse merger, not an IPO.
icon url

DreamGreen

10/20/13 5:26 PM

#52418 RE: rk091161 #52321

Agreed they chose this merger in place of an IPO. Here is an explanation why a company might chose to do so.

Why should I use a reverse merger rather than an IPO (Initial Public Offering)?
Reverse mergers have a number of benefits over IPO’s. For example, they tend to have lower costs, less required management attention, much shorter process times, and less dilution, which allows a private company’s management, founders, and prior investors to retain a greater percentage ownership of their company after going public. In addition, reverse mergers are not market-sensitive. Therefore, they are not dependent on the unpredictable IPO window “openings” or on underwriters and initial market prices on the particular day of trading.