LOL you sure do have it mixed up there... I'll help you out: I have said all along that John Banks shares that he dumps are "registered" not unregistered as you seem to believe.... there is actually a big difference. So since, as I claim that John Banks is dumping registered shares off at .0001 they actually would show up on your dumping report.
Hope this helps.
Yes you do make up the numbers when you infer that there are X millions shares that are assumed still shorted after 30 seconds of the trade.... The official SEC database points to no FTDs which equals no shorted shares....hmmmm wonder who I would believe...someone who has no clue about what happens 30 seconds after a trade goes through or the SEC...which does.
The volume over the 5 years isnt only dumping by toxic financiers like Banks but alot from penny players buying and selling.
You may be shocked to learn shares trade many many many times over and over. PYCT wouuld put out PRs and other hype via paid promoters and people would buy shares, see theres nothing really going on and sell. Other specualtors would swoop in and buy the shares thining they could double by buying at .0001 - alas they too see theres nothing and sell... its goes on all the time in the pennies. Adding up volumes means absolutely nothing. Seriously, I kid you not, same shares can trade dozens, hundreds of times even!! LOL!
Adanac if they're unregistered and don't show on the list, well the illegally naked short shares don't show up anywhere either. Some forget to mention that.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
