Replies to post #7168 on Rambus (RMBS)

[smd1234]

Jordan did not dis Payne - see below:

II. BACKGROUND
A detailed discussion of the background of this case, as well as related litigation involving Rambus's patents, was set forth by Judge McKelvie in an earlier opinion.
Micron, 189 F. Supp. 2d at 202-208. It suffices here to discuss the circumstances surrounding that earlier decision to delay the trial of this case.
Rambus asserted the same patents that are at issue here against Infineon Technologies AG ('lnfineon') in a lawsuit filed by Rambus in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Rambus Inc. v. lnfineon Techs. AG, Civ. A. No.
3:00cv524 (E.D. Va.) (the "Infineon case"). "Infineon brought a fraud counterclaim similar to Micron's fraud claim in this case." Micron, 189 F. Supp. 2d at 203. The Honorable Robert E. Payne...