InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 17023
Next 10
Followers 4
Posts 555
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/15/2004

Re: docrew0 post# 7168

Friday, 01/13/2006 3:40:54 PM

Friday, January 13, 2006 3:40:54 PM

Post# of 17023
Jordan did not dis Payne - see below:

II. BACKGROUND
A detailed discussion of the background of this case, as well as related litigation involving Rambus's patents, was set forth by Judge McKelvie in an earlier opinion.
Micron, 189 F. Supp. 2d at 202-208. It suffices here to discuss the circumstances surrounding that earlier decision to delay the trial of this case.
Rambus asserted the same patents that are at issue here against Infineon Technologies AG ('lnfineon') in a lawsuit filed by Rambus in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Rambus Inc. v. lnfineon Techs. AG, Civ. A. No.
3:00cv524 (E.D. Va.) (the "Infineon case"). "Infineon brought a fraud counterclaim similar to Micron's fraud claim in this case." Micron, 189 F. Supp. 2d at 203. The Honorable Robert E. Payne...

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RMBS News