News Focus
News Focus
icon url

CTS

09/24/13 11:39 AM

#3386 RE: researcher59 #3385

I think you have ulterior motives.
icon url

Rawnoc

09/24/13 11:40 AM

#3387 RE: researcher59 #3385

This PR seems professional:

http://online.wsj.com/article/HUG1731174.djm.html

Disclaimer -- by professional I mean I have no idea what they're talking about.
icon url

Katfish

09/24/13 11:41 AM

#3388 RE: researcher59 #3385

After reading the 10Q, I get the impression that the priority is to solve the debt issue. I have not heard back from the company...and that was one of the items I asked about. Anyway, the revenues are starting to grow as well, and there are new products about to come on-line.
icon url

Traderfan

09/24/13 12:52 PM

#3395 RE: researcher59 #3385

Researcher, I have never ever seen you invested in a stock where you are so negative about it. How can you stay invested here if you really think it's even "possible" that the financials are not correct. Without any real red flag btw.

I realize for some it's a "sport" to try to get cheap shares again by coming up with all kinds of weird theories after they sold but since I know that's not your plan, I simply wonder why you are invested and not just wait for clarification either way in the next few months. Who cares if you have to buy at 12 after good news regarding the debt instead of being invested here at 10?? These 20% you might miss (not even sure) are well invested because if I listen to you there is a good chance that the SEC shuts this stock down tomorrow because of false financial statements.

Again, without a single shred of evidence of even red flag really. You need to be aware that others here are more than happy to help you out in picking up such a conspiracy theory. Afterall such sub 7 cents shares would be nice again.... :-)