Replies to post #21553 on Petaquilla Minerals Ltd. (fka PTQMF)

[ratherbefishin]

after so many missed deadlines and promises-I'm not about to be holding my breath about what they''intend''to do-nor do I put much stock in official ''we anticipte'' announcements -thats a very typical Vancouver Penny Mining Stock tactic to keep the masses quiet-all I want to hear is what they've DONE not what they're ''gonna do''sometime, maybe ,this year or next-or the year after.Bull boards feed on this stuff-I can't even begin to remember how many times we were told to ''just wait''...and we did,and the stock continued its downward spiral until it bogged down in the 30 cent range...

[Implanting]

You really surprise me that with all your management experience and business knowledge that what these people "expect or "intend" to do is what may actually happen. You obviously haven't followed this outfit long enough. Sorry, but I'm not naive enough to believe everything I read and if these people were the going concern most of the PTQ promoters think they are why wouldn't they have already secured a financing deal? After all they just procured a minimum $75M aggregate deal with FQ. To date that hasn't amounted to a hill of beans towards getting more financing. Hmmm, I wonder why?

IMO it's just as plausible that Fifer is waiting for the Big Boys over at FQ to do their evaluations and see if PTQ fits into their plans a little further. Maybe yes, maybe no, but this financing debacle is taking a lot longer than would seem necessary IMHO.

It's only speculation on my part, but not that far fetched either.

[DigiTech]

Just to clarify, my post about the PTQ perceived lack of news about financing was made "without comments" The reason for that is that I will not respond any longer (private message response only) to questions generated by any poster. I will only correct erroneous statements like "As we continue to hear nothing on getting financing" with the links were the data is and no comments.

I leave it to the readers to draw their own conclusion and evaluate the accuracy of the statements made against the actual data supplied.

My previous post was made as a reply and should have been a stand alone post.

Comments about need for the financing, financing by project strategy, actual net cash value of the gravel business, make vs. buy for aggregate, cashflow projections, Impact of non-gold revenue on the business, revenue forecast for PDI, significant issues facing the company can be found on a different Board.

Discussions about what production level make a company a junior vs. a mid level gold producer, length of conference call 3 years ago, why the company did not meet the projection of posters and should be held accountable for not doing so can be found on this Board.

A very good thing about this Board is that it provides a very comprehensive Intro Box abour Petaquilla that will be updated as soon as the year end results are published. In addition the segment about PDI will be expanded as the estimation of PDI revenue run rate is close to $50M a year as of September 2013.