Replies to post #22374 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[sarals]

Matt has made his bias against stock naysayers very public.

Even though that's true, he administrates even-handedly. I've seen him go to great lengths to defend the right of naysayers to post.

[0nceinalifetime]

Oh, you naughty girl, you! Cassandra, you are just a trouble-maker and rabble-rouster. Not only that, you have committed the sin of being negative! Everyone knows that is not as desirable as being positive. See how much nicer of a ring "positive" has compared to the "n" word? We should try to focus on purity, cleanliness, profits and chastity, not greed, theft, lies, losses and orgies! Those are bad thought and we avoid them.

You are allowed to post the negative but it's not as highly regarded because, well, it's just not as good.

Once

[Mattu]

Cassandra,

I'm doing everything in my power to restrain myself from confronting you in public the way I said I wouldn't. You are showing exactly why the EDIG folks don't like you.

>>Matt has made his bias against stock naysayers very public.<<

Bias? Show me how I've been unfair to you or Once. If anything I've taken more bullet wounds for both of you than any pumper ever on this site. Granted, I've probably shown my personal distaste for you publicly, but I'm human. However, in my job as Admin, not once have I done anything that wasn't fair to you...if not overly fair to your camp.

Next, this "bias" against you doesn't come anywhere close to my distaste for JMHollen, who has to be the world's worst pumper. Matter of fact, I've said for years I detest pumpers and bashers. I like folks who consider both viewpoints and don't wear blinders to either side. I can't stand extremists to one camp or the other. Still can't. However, that has never swayed who I suspend or Admin-slap. There are have been a slew of both pumpers and bashers in Club Matt.

>>He has said that he does not understand why someone would bother to take the time to post about a stock in which they have no financial interest.<<

This is true. I still don't understand this, but it's my own personal question. I apparently deal in a different world. I value my time and put it into things that are productive. But I recognize that other people are different from me in this way.. SOo...

>>Supposedly he is conducting a survey about the topic. <<

Really? Where?

>>He required me to answer to him why I wanted to post on the EDIG board since I was not a shareholder before he would allow me more than 3 posts per day. This only occurred because I was honest about my true RB ID right up front and that I was a critic of EDIG.<<

How quick we are to forget. I won't bother.

>>From Matt's initial and continued reaction to me (an EDIG critic) and from subsequent events, I can only conclude that I am perhaps the one of the most, if not THE most controversial member(s) of iHub at this time. <<

No, you aren't, but you'd love to think so, eh?