Onceinalifetime: I completely agree with your assessment, but I also recognize that even if I hold 4 aces, Matt has a Smith & Wesson that beats it.
Matt has made his bias against stock naysayers very public. He has said that he does not understand why someone would bother to take the time to post about a stock in which they have no financial interest. Supposedly he is conducting a survey about the topic. He required me to answer to him why I wanted to post on the EDIG board since I was not a shareholder before he would allow me more than 3 posts per day. This only occurred because I was honest about my true RB ID right up front and that I was a critic of EDIG.
From Matt's initial and continued reaction to me (an EDIG critic) and from subsequent events, I can only conclude that I am perhaps the one of the most, if not THE most controversial member(s) of iHub at this time.