Re: indy708.
You are certainly more than willing to live, work, and prosper in this country but when it comes to paying your fair share for this privilage, then it becomes initiation of force.
Here's a tip for you. It's not a "privelege", it's a RIGHT. And it's not up to you or anyone else to decide what his "fair share" of anything is, particularly in terms of charity. When you usurp that decision, it IS "initiation of force".
I understand the difference between the nazi party and the libertarian party, the nazis attacked the very wealthy your agenda would attack the very poor, which happen to be blacks and hispanics.
SPALL, YOU RACIST BAST*RD! STOP ATTACKING THOSE POOR PEOPLE!
All in the spirit of a charismatic, utopian, free society.
Just "free" will be fine, thanks.
And no need to "attack" anyone. Only in that twisted little mind of yours does opposition to force constitute an "attack".
As I reject a government that would be controlled by those corporations who were willing to spend the most money to buy the most powerfull politician.
BFD. So do libertarians.
One point I almost agree with libertarians on is the legalization of drugs. But then if you didn't tax them heavily and redistribute the revenues generated back into education and treatment what would be the point?
I'm sure many who have been imprisoned, or had their property seized, or their lives otherwise ruined by the drug war, would think legalization was fairly worthwhile, regardless of these other issues. It's called freedom. Some get it, some don't.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
