News Focus
News Focus
icon url

frontloading

08/08/13 2:58 PM

#17812 RE: BigBadWolf #17810

They also stated in foreclosure filing that they intended to be present and bid ...news please victor. Unfortunately, both parties involved with foreclosure notice. Certainly one of them is the note holder.
icon url

Lawrence 147

08/08/13 3:09 PM

#17817 RE: BigBadWolf #17810

“FACT their NOTE is & has been in default as already proven by legally binding filings.”

[color=red][/color]

If TCA was the last to file notice they filed after the supposed sale of the note; a note which they were no longer supposed to hold any interest in.


This would lead me to believe they have recognized a huge mistake in the way they have conducted business and would most certainly be heard before any judge it was brought before thus ending any auction in its tracts should Intellicell decide to do things this way.

SVFC has stated they were entering negotiations with TCA to find out Iron Ridge had bought the note. SVFC would not go to a meeting to renegotiate a note they knew had been sold; this would lead me to believe there is some possible collusion between TCA and IR and were I a judge I would most certainly allow a cause to be brought forward and discovery to begin.