While the judge does not specifically cite 20.9% he does not cite Google's figure either. You are waiting for clarification I get that. The judge would have most likely cited a lower number because it is an important consideration if he felt it was warranted. I don't know what he will do and as a long I do care about this. As a trader I only care what the collective market does. I have a long-term position (sub $1) that I will not move until all the judgments are done and I have now re-established a trading position. As a trader the market is my judge.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
