InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 1141
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/11/2012

Re: postyle post# 39776

Sunday, 08/04/2013 3:09:09 PM

Sunday, August 04, 2013 3:09:09 PM

Post# of 68424
While the judge does not specifically cite 20.9% he does not cite Google's figure either. You are waiting for clarification I get that. The judge would have most likely cited a lower number because it is an important consideration if he felt it was warranted. I don't know what he will do and as a long I do care about this. As a trader I only care what the collective market does. I have a long-term position (sub $1) that I will not move until all the judgments are done and I have now re-established a trading position. As a trader the market is my judge.