Replies to post #46909 on DD Support Board and Research Team

[traderjoe3]

I here posted because someone shared a link from here on another board. Personally I say the guy is guilty because he accepted funds and agreed to launder the loot. I am also saying the guy didn't think it through because if he did he would have known the story didn't add up. Whether it was financial hardship or straight up greed doesn't matter, only thing that matters is he is screwed.

[traderjoe3]

Nope I don't know the man and have never spoken to him. As far as being a company attorney on a board that I post on I didn't even know that until someone pointed it out from a post on this board that they cut and pasted it, which is how I got to posting here. I honestly though Sarah Woulk was the company attorney from what I heard somewhere. Personally I don't care about this guy. I was just making a point that he apparently didn't think to hard about the cheese in the trap, he was hungry and took the bait. End of story. People here seem to be quite argumentative here so I'm going to bow out and let someone here have the last word.

[1manband]

What a crazy coincidence!

There sure are a lot of coincidences in penny stocks.......