News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Frackedup

06/28/13 3:52 PM

#3359 RE: jay14 #3358

StewJay, as I said the copies of all those court actions are in the current court case docs, no need to shop around its all in one place. Some of the words will be way to big for you to understand but you should give it a try.
icon url

Stewguts

06/28/13 4:09 PM

#3360 RE: jay14 #3358

Don't be drawn into their rabbit hole as it only serves them in perpetuating the confusion that was created by the Paniky Ones so many years ago that remained unchallenged until now. You can see by their high pitched squealing that they didn't expect TMMI to set the record straight and I believe they fear this case going to court.

It will be interesting to see what happens when this case goes to discovery. I bet the dentist will be out of gas by then and all of his followers wake up to find out they have no teeth left.

icon url

4retire

06/28/13 4:31 PM

#3361 RE: jay14 #3358

Jay, I don't post as fackedup, sue software or fraccy. I post as 4retire. I've posted this numerous times. There are numerous posts today wherein you think you're posting to me.

The court case in Ventura county is not foreign to you. We've posted about this numerous times. I even posted the court case for you on RB. This is the one that made me unsure of all of TMMI's claims on VDK2.0. Don't act like this is news to you. This is the case that Fernandez litigated for Simpson....not as a TMMI rep. but as an advisor for Simpson. This is the same one where the judge said the VDK2,0 belonged to DFMI, not Simpson and not TMMI. In this ruling the judge ordered DFMI to pay Simpson $144,000 for back salary but also appointed a forensic accountant to check this out. Guess what? It came out that Simpson owed DFMI hundreds of thousands of dollars for non-business expenses.