News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Manti

06/18/13 3:21 PM

#9691 RE: penniesbgone #9690

I understand well. It's like I've stated before: the same "facts" can have opposite meanings unless the true motive and intents are known behind the actions.

My current belief is that there is a core group of individuals who deliberately lied and took money form investors, and the others associated with their actions were victims. That doesn't mean that the others didn't make mistakes and perhaps succumb to human error in trying to recoup/recover from those mistakes, but I don't believe they were deliberately dishonest and trying to rip off others.

Between Q and N, I only see 4 individuals who deliberately tried to dishonestly enrich themselves at others' expense, and they do not include TF, MO or MK.
icon url

texkengold

06/18/13 3:29 PM

#9692 RE: penniesbgone #9690

sure that happens to all


and when you say;

"Besides, one's opinion can change once some facts are added. That ever happen to you?"

"Or do you operate on hype?"


but dont operate on hype

leave that to the docs.

so what are the facts, and heard this story again again and now again.

couple '40 million shares' and 'specific timeframe' together and that does raise eyebrows....lmk
jmho