I understand well. It's like I've stated before: the same "facts" can have opposite meanings unless the true motive and intents are known behind the actions.
My current belief is that there is a core group of individuals who deliberately lied and took money form investors, and the others associated with their actions were victims. That doesn't mean that the others didn't make mistakes and perhaps succumb to human error in trying to recoup/recover from those mistakes, but I don't believe they were deliberately dishonest and trying to rip off others.
Between Q and N, I only see 4 individuals who deliberately tried to dishonestly enrich themselves at others' expense, and they do not include TF, MO or MK.